A Proper Gander At Propaganda

Truth Transcends Community

"Then a mighty strange thing happened.  Guess you could call it fate. You see, a gust of wind blew the picture frame down and it landed on the muckidy muck's head And the mice they all went crazy. For the first time they saw the lie.

It was all a hoax on just simple folks. And the muckidy muck must die. And die he did. The members of his staff they just fled. They were scared. Hah. Just not prepared." - Song: The Proper Gander. Songwriter: Bobby Darin

"Propaganda in the United States is spread by both government and media entities. Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to influence opinions. It's used in advertising, radio, newspaper, posters, books, television, and other media."  -  Propaganda in the United States - Wikipedia

Article index

1977's Film The Wizard: An Allegory of The Power Hollywood Has Over Human Imagination & Behavior

I posted a this once before. I think it great allegory for the military industrial entertainment complex and it shows us that the real weapon of mass destruction is military grade cultural manipulative Hollywood/NEWS/Multimedia noise machine product. Wars are more a Hollywood style production than most know. War gets us to keep the wheel of industry turning for all time.

The "sexy" celebrity is as much a victim as the unwitting audience member.

Visual Effects Wizards Go To War

Wizards 1977 • Full  source: fashionfreakwardrobe

Dr. John Money Turns Nature & Cultural Artifice On Their Heads

MONEY MONEY MONEY: Talk about "F-ology"!

Money perverts reason and recommends wrong choices based on his own bias and psychotic agenda. Arbitrary fashion choices and natural gender, and natural tendencies, become weapons of mass destruction.

Don't  Tell Money But Socially Conditioned Fashions Are Arbitrary: The Founding Fathers Wore Powdered Wigs & Make Up

Kilts look an awful lot like skirts. Fashion choices are socially conditioned as is the rest of the socially enforced identities we are supposed to be conditioned to think really define us. How men act and how women act, whether one wears make up or plays with dolls, and all the rest of the rainbow of behavioral choices, are all the result of social conditioning and are somewhat arbitrary. These are choices and choices do not define who we are. People like Mr. Money confuse obvious and natural gender distinction with the artifacts of arbitrary culture and this is a mistake. Gender means generation as in making more of the species as in procreation. We are  naturally include and "designed" to be creators in this creation. Dr. Money is also a creator and his creation is pedophilia based propaganda.

History of Western fashion - Wikipedia

"Pervert or sexual libertarian?: Meet John Money, “the father of f***ology” "

"A trailblazing scientist and sexual libertarian, John Money's work was filled with contradictions and insight..." 

source: Pervert or sexual libertarian?: Meet John Money, “the father of f ... - Salon

Money Makes The Head Spin: Professional Pedophile & Pervert, Dr. John Money

John Money  source: Ashley M

TLC: THE MYTHOLOGY OF MONEY

Whatever the truth is or is not. Money's work is absurd and perverted nonsense and is based on unverifiable assumptions. He was interested in studying hermaphrodites. How many real cases are there of this phenomena and how many are just the stuff of legend?

MONEY IS THE INCENTIVE

"John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a psychologist, sexologist and author, specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of "gender" affect an individual. His work has been both celebrated for its innovation and criticized, particularly in regard to his involvement with the discredited sex-reassignment of David Reimer and his eventual suicide." 

"Money published around 2,000 articles, books, chapters and reviews. His writing has been translated into many languages. Money has received around 65 world-wide honors, awards, and degrees."

"Money was a professor of pediatrics and medical psychology at Johns Hopkins University from 1951 until his death. He also established the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic in 1965 along with Claude Migeon who was the head of plastic surgery at Johns Hopkins."

"Money introduced numerous definitions related to gender in journal articles in the 1950s, many of them as a result of his studies of Hermaphroditism."

John Money - Wikipedia

What were the real sources for his "theories", his imagination? How appropriate is Money's use of hermaphroditism as evidence for his perverted concepts. Children do not need to be sexualized and prepubescent youth have little to no real interest in adult behavior. John Money believes otherwise. He is Harvard educated so his illogical belief system must be correct. He wrote a bunch of books, after all. This research might be valid for the few who actually are hermaphrodites but it obviously does not apply to most of us human beings. In fact it is illogical to redefine gender as anything but the natural and obvious thing that it is. The rest is meant as identity product for us to self identify with.

True hermaphroditism - Wikipedia

http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1987/A1987G240300001.pdf

Hermaphroditism, gender and precocity in hyperadrenocorticism - NCBI

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2503930/

A Transglobal Reach Around:

"The New Zealand-born, U.S.-based psychologist John Money (1921–2006) has had a singular influence on the diagnosis and treatment of (to use Money’s terms) “hermaphroditism,” “transsexualism,” and “paraphilia.” The reception of his more than five hundred articles and over forty books, as well as hundreds of neologisms including “gender” itself, has been both exceptionally significant and strikingly uneven. Whereas “gender” is now a ubiquitous, everyday term in the English-speaking world, and “lovemap” has entered the lexicon of popular psychology, some of his more outlandish coinages, concepts, and recommendations have entered neither popular nor medical currency.

Money’s widespread yet disparate uptake is explained partly by the fact that his stylistically bizarre texts were aimed at multiple audiences, most often physicians, psychiatrists, and sexologists, but sometimes anthropologists, historians, psychoanalysts, and lay readers. Money’s career was also beset by ethical controversy, exemplified by the internationally publicized case of David Reimer. Following sex reassignment in infancy under Money’s guidance, in response to a circumcision accident, Reimer’s story was held variously to show Money as humane and barbaric, naive and deceitful, a social constructionist and an anatomical determinist. Just as Money’s ideas have been characterized as either pathologizing or liberating, so too has Money’s flamboyant persona been beatified or damned. These tendencies to polarize Money and his work are both productive and symptomatic of a failure to interrogate the complexities, contradictions, and tensions in Money’s oeuvre. Therefore, a careful cross-disciplinary, multiauthored engagement with Money’s work and its deployment is overdue.

For example, sufficiently close attention has not hitherto been paid to Money’s fears (which were probably understandable given the historico-political context of his work during the 1950s) that sexology could be dismissed as a prurient, if not altogether “perverse” practice, much as its forerunners in the nineteenth century had been demonized by many doctors and clerics. It is in this light that we understand Money’s constant demand that his field, for which his predecessors “could not find a name,” should be considered both a legitimate science and the natural home of taboo-busting “sex research.” The conception of a unique (nameless) scientific field—which Money argues complements other sciences such as urology, gynecology, endocrinology, and so on, and for which he suggested the name “fuckology”—functions hand in hand with Money’s fascination with a “Linnaean” taxonomic approach to human experience. A passion for creating taxonomies is evident in his coining of a plethora of diagnostic and technical terms, including “Adam Principle,” “exigency theory,” “gynemimesis,” “mindbrain,” “neurocognitional,” “normophilia,” “phylism,” “troopbondance,” and a whole range of paraphilias, such as “apotemnophilia,” “autassassinophilia,” and “autonepiophilia,” to give only a sample of those at the beginning of the alphabet. It is, then, somewhat ironic that Money claimed inspiration from Willa Cather and Ernest Hemingway for their “economy of words and uncluttered style.”

Connecting Money’s aspiration to scientificity and his tendency to taxonomic invention is his view of both “gender” and the “lovemap” as kinds of “native language.” In one paper from 1982, Money wrote: “For sexological research the development of . . . an analytic vocabulary is not simply an ideal, but an absolute necessity, for without it erotosexual practice cannot be properly subdivided and reduced to identifiable units for investigation in research.” And, in the same paper, he could not resist adding, after a mention of “every behavioral unit,” a parenthetical nascent term for this concept: “(behavioron).” For Money then, as we will explore in this book, the acquisition of a language about sex was an object of study, a scientific method, and a master metaphor, all at once."

source: http://www.salon.com/2015/01/04/pervert_or_sexual_libertarian_meet_john_money_the_father_of_fology/

Mature Content Warning:

The Professional Pedophile & Pervert, Dr. Money Uses Language To Craft His Agenda Into Socially Palatable Form

"The title of this book, Fuckology, is a reappropriation of a neologism that Money proposed for introduction into scholarly, clinical, and lay discourse. He wrote in 1988 of the need for “a word like fuckology, used in everyday, vernacular English to signify the science of what it is that people actually do under the cover of polite expressions like making love or having sex.” Although this book’s critical remit is wider than Money’s contribution to the study of sexual orientations and practices, and while the book certainly does not seek to further Money’s agenda by using “fuckology” as a candid descriptor in the way that he suggests is possible, the term “fuckology,” used against the grain, strikes us as extraordinarily appropriate shorthand to describe a method of queering—or fucking with—sexology, and with the logic of scientificity in which it is invested. In particular, we are aware of, and seek precisely to exploit, the readerly discomfort and uncertainty potentially engendered by the use of this nonacademic vocabulary (the sort of vocabulary that Money himself might have called “the terminology of the barnyard”). Money often used sexualized rather than clinical terms for sexual activities, such as the verbs “to quim” and “to swive,” which he derived from vernacular seventeenth century terms for genitalia, and which were intended by Money to describe “the active-assertive practice of the female and the male, respectively, in penovaginal copulation.” He seems to have understood such linguistic misdemeanors as acts of daring resistance to an imagined censorious “sex police,” albeit in a gesture that risked undermining his claims made elsewhere for the scientific seriousness of this work; Money was aware as early as 1955 that neologisms could be regarded as “perverse technical jargon.” Putting aside our various reservations about Money’s intentions in introducing neologisms such as these, we find the term “fuckology” productive insofar as it suggests resistance to a unified theory of Money. Further, “fuckology” disrupts the domestication of Money’s peculiar oeuvre as a transient moment along a path to ever more scientific and humane knowledge of “hermaphroditism,” “transsexualism,” and “paraphilia.”"

source: http://www.salon.com/2015/01/04/pervert_or_sexual_libertarian_meet_john_money_the_father_of_fology/

Religious Psychosis: Government, Religion & Science Are As One

Please Keep In Mind Modern "Science" Is A Religion

What most people think of as modern science is a religion. Government is a faith based system, or religion too, complete with ritual, myths and demigods. Government is religion with guns. The University educated mind is the product of a very real program of religious indoctrination. Underlying assumptions are not to be questioned. The gods of science passed "laws" that cannot be questioned and the "Founding Fathers" work is engraved in govern-mental stone.

The university educated mind is conditioned by a grading system. This system tends to produce parroting minds that echo what they are programmed to rather than critical thinkers and self actualized and self confident human beings. Students are conditioned with what to think. Students are not taught how to think. In fact most education is done on a  social conditioning level at the mass consumer scale and does not take place in the classroom at all. Mass psychological tools and the use of celebrity idol shepherds, are the means by which human behavior is crafted and controlled.

A Socially Ordered Disorder

Peer review means everybody is jumping off the bridge so you should too. Lemming like behavior has long been the primary tool of enforcing social order. Peer review and peer pressure share much in common. We are not supposed to question underlying assumptions; yet such questioning can only lead to knowledge not ignorance. An auto mechanic who can't take an engine apart and put it back together again is somewhat useless, no?

Nobel prizes given to propagandists prove nothing. Such institutions exist to reinforce the social order in a circularly reasoned fallacious manner. Such institutional recognition creates icons meant to be emulated and followed. Such idols act as intellectual lords and the final arbitrators of reason and the imagination for the shepherded flock.

Students are taught catechisms more often than not.

The Psychology of Religion - Steven Pinker    source: Prometheus Unchained

Scientism is A Religion: Science Is Not A Magical Being That Can Solve All Problems

The current religion of scientism invokes the higher invisible authority of mythic figures like Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton, two men who were little more than mathematically inclined mystics. Scientism makes appeals to the higher authority of a guy in a wheel chair who can't speak for himself and other apparent live action cartoon characters sold to the public as legitimate "science guys".

Scientism makes the empty and illogical appeal to the authority of the "Big Bang", a concept dreamt up by a Jesuit priest.

Quantum fantasies with no basis in reality are sold as fact. That is another sign that "science" is a religion.

"Science" itself seems to be worshipped and invoked in the exact same manner religious folk invoke God.

The modern religion of scientism makes use of illogically premised peer (priest) reviewed mathematical formula that act a lot more like religious magical spells and binding mantras than any real kind of demonstrable science. Natural principle is ignored over so-called "discovered Laws", which can only be represented by illogically applied mathematical models that amount to mathematical gibberish. An equal sign is not some kind of magical symbol and equations need to be logically founded. Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein never did real experiments to prove their spaced out fantasies. They did "thought experiments". Darwin's ideas are interesting and natural selection has an obvious demonstrable reality, but the problem is Darwin could point to no actual evidence to prove his ideas. He could only point to the fact that we can breed for traits. We can breed beagles and german shepherds. What we can't do is make a dog turn into a cat. We can't breed a beagle into a beer. All we can do is breed for secondary characteristics like skin color, hair type and so on. The circularly reasoned time scale as evidence for the theory of evolution is obviously illogical. Again, we aren't supposed to look into the underlying assumptions for any of the claims of so-called "settled science". We are supposed to repeat the catechisms in order to continuously reinforce our religious beliefs or faith.

We are not supposed to look into the details of the experiments that claim to support the work of people like Einstein. We are not encouraged to even read the original work itself. We are simply supposed to parrot back the catechism the media scientists and the university system teaches us, despite any obvious absurdity.

Too much of mainstream science really is nothing more than religious faith. When you actually examine the claims and the supporting details, you begin to realize that these people are not talking about demonstrable natural phenomena, they are discussing the imagined model and nothing more. In this manner unquestioning minds continue to work on building the proverbial Tower of Babel that grows further and further removed from reality. It's really a good idea to question all underlying assumptions. Anything less is simply a relgious adherence to a system of thought.

Learn To Admit When You Are Wrong & Do Not Be Afraid of Failure: It's ok to make mistakes. We all do.

By the way, the brain never stops developing and we never really stop learning. If we take more control over our own minds and imaginations we can program ourselves rather than letting our environment and social conditions do it for us. The human being works a certain way and that involves very real physical and chemical phenomena. Neuroscience and behavioral sciences have firmer and demonstrable foundation. It's very important to never stop learning and to never stop questioning all underlying assumption as much as humanly possible.

The Transgender Agenda Lie: No Take Backs & No Regrets!

Gender Regrets? Is the grass always going to be greener on the other side?

Just some food for thought. I do not know anything about this man and do not know whether his story is true or not. I do think there is something to what he is saying. Human beings do expedience buyer's remorse and one would think that many people would have regrets after undergoing needless medical procedures.

65 per cent women regret after having cosmetic surgery

10 Plastic Surgery Mistakes No One Talks About - Total Beauty

Real Regrets?

Sex change regret -- it's real    source:  Walt Heyer

There's Money To Be Made Either Way

"Reversal surgery in regretful male-to-female transsexuals after SRS represents a complex, multistage procedure with satisfactory outcomes. Further insight into the characteristics of persons who regret their decision postoperatively would facilitate better future selection of applicants eligible for SRS."

Reversal Surgery in Regretful Male-to-Female Transsexuals After Sex ...

Something To Consider:

"The insanity of hormone blockers for kids:  One controversial treatment for children with gender dysphoria is the administration of drugs called hormone blockers to delay puberty. The practice is gaining traction without any scientific proof that it is appropriate or effective, and despite the evidence that it can be harmful:

  1. Most children with gender dysphoria will not remain gender dysphoric after puberty. [1]
  2. The FDA has not approved hormone blockers for use in transgender children—not even for experimental use.
  3. A search for one hormone blocker, Lupron, shows that people are reporting serious long-term, debilitating side effects from having used the drug. 

Given these facts, why would anyone inject these drugs into children?  Doctors and parents want to help the child cope with the distress he or she is experiencing. Is relief of adolescent distress really worth the risk?  Most will grow out of the dysphoria. Isn't there some way to work through the distress than experimenting on our children? "

"Gender Regret News  If Sex Change Regret Is Rare, Why Are Surgeons Offering Reversal Surgery? I've been reporting about the widespread regret for years while everyone in the media says regret is rare. The Belgrade Center for Genital Reconstructive Surgery says that they have received requests for reversal surgery." 

"If sex change regret is so rare, why are surgeons offering reversal surgery?" 

"These surgeons are known to perform the reversal surgery:

  • Dr. Sava Perovic, Sava Perovic Foundation Surgery
  • Dr. Rados Djinovic, Sava Perovic Foundation Surgery
  • Dr. Miroslav Djordjevic, Belgrade Center for Genital Reconstructive Surgery
  • Dr. Stan Monstrey, Universitair Ziekenhuis
  • Dr. Sherman Leis, The Philadelphia Center for Transgender Surgery"

"Of course the answer is: sex change regret is not rare at all."

source: http://www.sexchangeregret.com

Something To Think About

Why I detransitioned and what I want medical providers to know (USPATH 2017)    source: Cari Stella

Fallacious Media Claims & Identity Propaganda, From The Washington Post:

"4. Transgender people often come to regret transitioning.

One of the most common and misleading tropes about transgender people is that many regret making their transitions. There are websitesYouTube channels and even books dedicated to the topic. One writer, Walt Heyer (who regrets his own transition), claims that 20 percent of transgender people regret transitioning, 41 percent attempt suicide and at least 60 percent suffer from some kind of mental illness. “Suicide and regret,” he writes, “remain the dark side of transgender life.” 

These statistics and misstatements are based on outdated research. More recent studies suggest that less than 4 percent of people who get gender-reassignment surgery regret it. Researchers have also found that the surgery dramatically reduces suicide rates among trans people. That makes sense — the surgery can improve self-esteem, body image and general life satisfaction. This is why the international standard of care for adolescents and adults in many countries is to offer transition services."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-transgender-issues/2016/05/13/eca17dbc-177e-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html?utm_term=.ced5142c3f51

 

A True No Return Policy: The "More Recent Studies" Exposed

The new studies that claim that only a small minority have no regrets making permanent alterations to their bodies is based on flimsy statistics. Only a couple of hundred or so people were considered. That is a tiny sample. The "more recent studies" seem to be one study, reproduced, in part, below.

"Only data of the 162 adults were used to evaluate treatment."

 

"Sex reassignment: outcomes and predictors of treatment for adolescent and adult transsexuals.

Smith YL1, Van Goozen SHKuiper AJCohen-Kettenis PT.

Author information

BACKGROUND: 

We prospectively studied outcomes of sex reassignment, potential differences between subgroups of transsexuals, and predictors of treatment course and outcome.

METHOD: 

Altogether 325 consecutive adolescent and adult applicants for sex reassignment participated: 222 started hormone treatment, 103 did not; 188 completed and 34 dropped out of treatment. Only data of the 162 adults were used to evaluate treatment. Results between subgroups were compared to determine post-operative differences. Adults and adolescents were included to study predictors of treatment course and outcome. Results were statistically analysed with logistic regression and multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS: 

After treatment the group was no longer gender dysphoric. The vast majority functioned quite well psychologically, socially and sexually. Two non-homosexual male-to-female transsexuals expressed regrets. Post-operatively, female-to-male and homosexual transsexuals functioned better in many respects than male-to-female and non-homosexual transsexuals. Eligibility for treatment was largely based upon gender dysphoria, psychological stability, and physical appearance. Male-to-female transsexuals with more psychopathology and cross-gender symptoms in childhood, yet less gender dysphoria at application, were more likely to drop out prematurely. Non-homosexual applicants with much psychopathology and body dissatisfaction reported the worst post-operative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: 

The results substantiate previous conclusions that sex reassignment is effective. Still, clinicians need to be alert for non-homosexual male-to-females with unfavourable psychological functioning and physical appearance and inconsistent gender dysphoria reports, as these are risk factors for dropping out and poor post-operative results. If they are considered eligible, they may require additional therapeutic guidance during or even after treatment."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842032

Full pdf file: http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/23255/189321.pdf?sequence=1

Some excerpts from the full study:

As you can read this study is not a sound reflection of reality at all. It reads more like propaganda. It is obviously biased and the sample if obviously too small and limited in scope. Further the study recognizes that not all of the subjects had the same number of procedures. Not all of them "went all the way", as they say. Some had only certain procedures done. The time period is supposed to be a minimum of one year after the procedures, but the study doesn't seem to provide the maximum time value.

"Pre-test data were gathered during the first diagnostic procedure after the first interview. Follow-up data were gathered at least 1 year after surgery. Sessions took between 2 and 3 hours. The Ethics Committees of the UMCU and VUmc approved the study. "

"Subjects: A total of 325 consecutive adolescents and adults, who applied for SR at VU University Medical Centre in Amsterdam (VUmc) or Uni- versity Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), par- ticipated. Of these, 222 (146 MFs, 76 FMs) started hormone treatment: the ‘starter’ group. Twenty-nine MFs and 5 FMs stopped hormone treatment: the ‘drop-out’ group. The group who completed SR consisted of 188 patients (117 MFs, 71 FMs): the ‘completer’ group. The group who never started hormone treatment consisted of 103 patients (74 MFs, 29 FMs). Pre-test data from this ‘no-starter’ group varied from 89 to 103. At follow-up, some participants had moved abroad, while others were untrace- able, which resulted in 158 (94 MFs, 64 FMs) participants who were interviewed."

"Follow-up data ranged between 136 and 158 because not all participants were willing or able to take part in both an interview and a questionnaire session "

"Questionnaire data for different measures fluctuated from 101 to 126. Since SR patients do not undergo all possible operations, data on breast augmentation were gathered from 52 MFs (21 homosexuals, 31 non-homosexuals), and on metaidoioplasty or phalloplasty from 10 FMs (4 homosexuals, 6 non-homosexuals). Scores on the Appraisal of Appearance Inventory were obtained from 57 adults."

MATURE CONTENT WARNING:

"Satisfaction with surgery. For FMs breast removal is emotionally the most important surgery. They are advised to postpone metaidoio- plasty (transformation of the hypertrophic clitoris into a micropenis) or phalloplasty in view of the fact that surgical techniques are steadily improving. Eleven FMs (28.9 %) were satisfied with their breast removal, 5 (13.2%) were dissatisfied due to the visibility of the scars, and 22 (57.9%) were not completely satisfied. Four FMs were satisfied with their metaidoio- plasty or phalloplasty. One FM was dissatisfied because of urinary problems, while four were not completely satisfied.

For the MFs vaginoplasty is the most im- portant surgical intervention. The majority of MFs (47, 70.1 %) were satisfied ; 15 (22.4 %) were not completely satisfied, mostly because they considered their vagina not deep or feminine enough. Five MFs (7.5 %) were dissatisfied, because they were unable to achieve sexual arousal or orgasm, or because corrective surgery was needed. The majority (34, 65.4%) were satisfied with their breast augmentation; 15 (28.8 %) were not completely satisfied, and three felt uneasy about their breasts being too far apart. "

Snip Snip & Rebuild: The Human Body Is Now A Money Making Construction Zone

None of the men who become women seem interested in trying to emulate monthly menstruation nor do they seem interested in bearing children. This seems to be simply some kind of sexual based proclivity given life by way of medical sculpture. It is illogical to expect to have fully functioning genitalia after such obvious scarification and mutilation. I would think it unwise to go around cutting away one's own body parts.  This seems to be an agenda that feeds into a very shallow and distorted body image alternate reality completely divorced from common sense and reason. Magical medical science can't really live up to all the advertising claims of the magical transitions from dudes to smoking hot internet chicks. In real life your results will vary. In real life you were better off keeping your original equipment intact. The medical industry has clear financial incentive to push for a continuous stream of hormone therapies and surgeries. This is what being transgender is supposed to mean, complete and utter reliance on an external system that is completely unnecessary. One is supposed to self neuter and do irreversible damage to themselves in the name of "liberty". Science is so powerful "they" can make you into anything you want, and one day maybe they can make it so you can live forever in a computer game. Of course there is no reason to believe this, but many of us seem to think such nonsense "scientifically sound". Science isn't magic and there are many real world limits that the mainstream marketing noise machine conveniently ignores. If you go through this gender mill, your results will end up being far less impressive than the advertising claims.

Human See Human Do: The Manufacturing of Reality

The Power of The Celebrity Presence:

(Excerpted from: Biological, psychological and social processes that explain celebrities’ influence on patients’ health-related behaviors, by Steven J Hoffman  and Charlie Tan)

"Celebrities can have substantial influence as medical advisors. However, their impact on public health is equivocal: depending on the advice’s validity and applicability, celebrity engagements can benefit or hinder efforts to educate patients on evidence-based practices and improve their health literacy. This meta-narrative analysis synthesizes multiple disciplinary insights explaining the influence celebrities have on people’s health-related behaviors."

"Social construction of reality (sociology)

The ways in which people evaluate, interpret and perceive health information can also be influenced by celebrities. According to social constructivism, reality is a cultural product, formed by people’s interactions with each other and their environments [89]. The ways individuals create and learn knowledge is determined by the social activities in which they engage. This applies both to the social construction of health information as well as the social reconstruction of this information by each and every person in different ways depending on their unique social environment. This mechanism of celebrity influence is supported by a recent interview-based study’s finding that people assess information about vaccination differently: acceptors wholly accept social norms, reliers follow the norms of their social networks, and searchers independently seek whatever information they need [90]. Celebrities modify the ways all three types of people evaluate, interpret and perceive health information and consequently influence their health behaviors, albeit in different ways.

For acceptors, celebrities shape social norms that are internalized and acted upon. Much of the interest in detox cleansing and fasting, for example, can be attributed to celebrities like Salma Hayek and Ashton Kutcher who have made such behaviors socially acceptable and popular for weight loss and reducing gastrointestinal malaises. For reliers, many of their friends, family members and colleagues may follow or discuss celebrity medical advice, which indirectly encourages them to act similarly. For searchers, the information they gather may knowingly or unknowingly include advice from celebrities, especially as the internet burgeons with the health information they share. This means that all types of people, not just gossipmongers or people with low self-esteem, can be affected by the ways celebrities shape the social construction and reconstruction of health information."

Read More

The Tavistock Film Festival & YouTube Present: The Transgender Agenda (Individual Results May Vary)

Mature Content Wanring: Some Mature Imagery Ahead

Social engineering in the digital age of instant commerce explored.

Individual Results May Vary: Case Study - YouTube's Gigi Gorgeous

I  think it possible the before male person is not the same person as the after the hormone therapy and sex change surgery female person. I am very skeptical of the results we see here. Considering this is highly edited video footage strung together to create the impression of a narrative, and this is all the evidence we have to examine, I would suggest my opinion is the rationale one.

I have a feeling quite a few of the celebrities promoted as transgender are not transgender at all and are simply the natural gender they appear to be. Presenting a real woman as a "former man" is quite a mind trip. Cognitive dissonance at it's finest.

 I do not know "Gigi" but I would wager this is what it seems to be, official YouTube social agenda, propaganda. If this person really transitioned from a male into a female as we are shown then good for him! He really pulled it off and looks like a she as far as I can tell. (watch both videos)  Yet I would think that most people will not be able to make such a wonderful transition from one gender state to the next. I'd imagine it would take years of hormone therapy and cosmetic surgery to achieve far less of a result than this remarkable feat, but then again what do I know, I am not a doctor, or am I? 

For all we know "Gigi" are just fraternal twins. One a boy and one a girl. Or perhaps just people who simply look alike. When all we have is highly edited video footage as evidence, these ideas represent real possibilities. In fact it's possible that we have three different people here playing the same role. (watch both videos to see what I mean) It doesn't matter if we have the most rare example for the best transition "ever" or we have what seems to be a long standing media hoax, the agenda is the same, this is 21st century marketing.

This Might Just Be 21st Century Social Identity Bait & Switch Advertising

"Angier discovers and subsequently steals Borden's fantastic trick "The Transported Man," where Borden instantly travels between two wardrobes on opposite ends of a stage. Cutter and Olivia groom Root, an out-of-work actor, into a "double" for Angier to mimic his appearance and mannerisms. 'The New Transported Man' is a huge success, but Angier is displeased, as he ends the trick hidden under the stage while Root basks in the applause."

The Prestige (film) - Wikipedia

A Claim of One Year of Hormone Therapy and A Some Hospital Footage Does Not a Gender Transition Make:

*Your Results Will More Than Likely Vary

A One Stop Cosmetic Photoshop?

This Is Everything: Gigi Gorgeous - OFFICIAL TRAILER   source: Gigi Gorgeous

Self Adhesive Breast Forms Are Easily Obtainable Online. Imagine What a Hollywood makeup expert could do.

The reason not to believe what we see on screens in highly edited form is obvious. Hollywood techniques have always included the art of creating very believable illusions and one of the earliest and easiest forms of film fakery makes use of make up, prosthetics and lighting techniques. Highly edited video product is proof of nothing, more often than not. Photographs have always been manipulated in the darkroom to produce the desired results. Buyer beware, you results may vary and more than likely will

YouTube BoomTube

Men Try Breast Forms: Detachable Silicone Breasts!   source:  Davison Video

Always remember a professional Hollywood production makes liberal use of a myriad of techniques to craft highly believable illusions.

Self-adhesive breast form report - Crossdressers.com

Amazon.com: Envy Body Shop Adhesive Silicone Breast Forms ...

How I would do it:

A pair of fraternal twins (or siblings that resembled each other) pretending to be a person transitioning seamlessly from one gender to another would make for the perfect role model and idol, no? A third final actress to take over the role might be an interesting ending twist. Or I would employ every Hollywood special effect and makeup technique I could to present the best example of this 21st century identity product as I could. Perhaps I would use a combination of all those techniques. Perhaps some plastic surgery is involved. Some men are more feminine than others and some women have more masculine features, I might make use of that as well. There could be some real hormone therapy too. Maybe just some make up and silicone prosthetics is all we need.

In fact the more I think about it the more I think that what we have here is a role played by two people. One a man and the latter one (see video below) a woman. I think it likely the young man in the above video simply had prosthetics applied to make him appear to have transitioned and then the role was taken over by an actress. 

There are many ways to craft the advertising illusions we need to sell identity product to the mass public.

Your real medical results will vary of course, but don't think about that at all. This looks like it is going to be big medical business! Investing in this sector might be sound economic (albeit immoral) advise, It's not a good idea to seek permanent body modification solutions to one's individual "problems", but hey "everyone" is going Hollywood cosmetic surgery crazy, so why not?

  

Think Of All The Money To Be Made From Years of Endless Hormonal Therapy and Surgery!

 

GIDS - The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

https://tavistockandportman.nhs.uk/about-us/news/stories/warm-welome-gender-identity-clinic/

Tavistock Relationships

Tavistock Institute

 

If I'm Wrong This Is Quite An Achievement That Most Will Not Realize

Whether this is the same person after what seems to be a minimum of fuss or not, the point is you results will vary! This is modern advertising and nothing more. The product being sold is the transgender identity. If you are a dude it is unlikely you will magically be turned into someone who looks like a Hollywood actress/model with what seems to be a minimum of fuss and a minimum of time. Hormone therapies and body altering surgeries are not something to enter into lightly. Needless medical "treatments" like all forms of needless cosmetic surgery are money makers for the medical industry overall and that incentive is obviously driving much of what we see.

Think Bruce Jenner is Jealous?

YouTube Is Government: YouTube Is The 21st Century Weapon of Mass Cultural Detonation

Do not easily believe what you see on screens.

Gigi mentions both 9/11 and Flat Earth, An Advertising Shout Out To Two of YouTubes Biggest "Conspiracy" Communities

REACTING TO MY OLD VIDEOS PART 1! | Gigi    Gigi Gorgeous

Maintaing YouTube Media Memes

Edited video of a young man wearing similar make up and the same kind of fake eyelashes as a person that appears to be a woman is not proof of anything.

A Gorgeous Media Figure Emerges:

(She must have a great agent.)

"Gigi Loren Lazzarato (born Gregory Allan Lazzarato on April 20, 1992), better known as Gigi Gorgeous, is a Canadian model, actress, and internet personality. She is noted for publicly coming out as a transgender woman, and maintaining her public image and YouTube channel during and after her transition. Along with being an internet personality, Lazzarato has also appeared on a number of television shows including Access Hollywood, Good Work, and Project Runway: All Stars, along with starring as herself in the popular online reality show The Avenue for three years."

Gigi Gorgeous - Wikipedia

 

Let Me Get This Straight: 

The Guy Who Claimed To Originally Be A Gay Male Transitions To A Woman And Then Comes Out as a Lesbian?

Talk about "transitions" Gigi went from a being a gay dude wearing makeup to becoming a lesbian "hot chick".

God bless Gigi, Gigi has found bliss. Gigi has surfed the gender spectrum from one end to the other.

"2008–13: Beginnings on YouTube and The Avenue: Prior to her transition, Lazzarato was known as Gregory or Greg, and operated a makeup tutorial YouTube channel that was started in 2008. At the time, she identified as a gay male."

"Lazzarato, who had previously identified herself as bisexual, came out as lesbian in a YouTube video on September 14, 2016."

"Lazzarato is a practicing Roman Catholic and describes herself as religious."

"Lazzarato is in a relationship with Natalia Williams, an heiress and member of the Getty family"

"Transition: Lazzarato announced that she was a transgender woman in December 2013. Since then she has undergone electrolysis, tracheal shave, hormone replacement therapy, facial feminization surgery, rhinoplasty, and breast augmentation.  She legally had her name changed to Gigi Loren Lazzarato on March 8, 2014. "

"In a September 2015 issue of People Magazine, Lazzarato credited transgender model and performing artist, Amanda Lepore and her mother's death for sparking her transition."

Gigi Gorgeous - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getty_Images

 

In just two years this person is supposed to have transitioned from one gender to the other, in a perfect manner.

 

Money Makes This Mad Mad World Go Merry Go Round: This agenda is driven by money not freedom.

"Now, federal law prohibits health insurance companies from discriminating against transgender people, and it bars insurers from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. That makes it possible for more transgender people to purchase private plans. And in states that expanded their Medicaid programs, those with low incomes may get free coverage. 

The federal anti-discrimination regulations have yet to be written, but California insurance regulators have said that companies must treat transgender patients the same as other patients. For example, if plans cover hormones for post-menopausal women, they must also cover them for transgender women. Medicare, the program for the elderly and disabled, lifted its ban on covering sex reassignment surgery earlier this year. "

Obamacare Opens Door For Gender Reassignment Surgery | The ...

"Program Description
The goal of this conference is to enhance the health and well-being of members of the transgender community by (1) increasing the number of mental health and medical health care providers who feel comfortable and confident providing care for transgender patients; (2) increasing transgender community members’ knowledge, self-efficacy and advocacy skills through transgender centered educational sessions."

2017 Trans* Health Conference | Office of Continuing Medical Education

Transgender transition care will cost the military this much - Fortune

Permanent Results That Will Vary

Please note I am not advocating laws banning these procedures or anything like that. I think we should have less laws and more rationale discussions of ideas. An honest airing of individual views is the better way to go. I have nothing against anyone who self identifies as transgender or who goes through these procedures even though I disagree with them. What other adults do to themselves is of little concern to me. The obvious institutional intellectual dishonesty and the propaganda campaign itself, is what interests me. If someone really wants to do something (destructive) to themselves, there's not really much anyone can do to stop them, other than discussing things in an open and honest way. Hormone therapies and unnecessary surgeries do not seem like the correct solution to the problem;  you can't simply undo permanent body mutilation.

 

Pizzagate ain't got nothing on Papa John Money!

"He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of "gender" affect an individual."

"Money made the concept of gender a broader, more inclusive concept than one of masculine/feminine. For him, gender included not only one's status as a man or a woman, but was also a matter of personal recognition, social assignment, or legal determination; not only on the basis of one's genitalia but also on the basis of somatic and behavioral criteria that go beyond genital differences."

John Money wikipedia entry

This is all about MONEY:

$$$ Dr. John Money $$$

(with special thanks to Fakeologist)

 

Nothing like a Harvard education and no personal experience as a parent and barely any as a husband. 

"He left Pittsburgh and earned his PhD from Harvard University in 1952. He was married briefly in the 1950s but had no children."

 John Money wikipedia entry

 

(presenting the legendary pervert, a masochistic and pedophilia based psychopathic child psychologist: Dr. John Money)

 

Get Ready For A Whole Lot of Nonsense That Illogically Self Identifies As Science:

John Money applied his ideas about hermaphrodites to everyone, defining a magical spectrum of baseless division in the process. We don't even know how valid his ideas about hermaphrodites are. This entire field of study reads a lot like so-called space science. This is about creating more of the social constructs known as "identities". Gender identity becomes a way to further define one's self.  Of course you are not the choices you make. Identity is a social artifice. It is a lie. Money applies gender to many attributes it need not be associated with and in doing so he attempts to create a whole slew of new identities that we can further sort ourselves into. Sexual behavior is a choice not an identity. You can't control who you are attracted to but who you are attracted to does not define you. That would be like assuming that since you like trees you are one. Do you self identify as a pedestrian when you are walking? Is that your identity?

"John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a psychologist, sexologist and author, specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of "gender" affect an individual. His work has been both celebrated for its innovation and criticized, particularly in regard to his involvement with the discredited sex-reassignment of David Reimer. and his eventual suicide. Money published around 2,000 articles, books, chapters and reviews. His writing has been translated into many languages. Money has received around 65 world-wide honors, awards, and degrees."

"Money suggests that the concept of threshold (Oxford 1988: 115) – the release or inhibition of sexual (or other) behavior – is most useful for sex research as a substitute for any concept of motivation. Moreover, it confers the distinct advantage of having continuity and unity to what would otherwise be a highly disparate and varied field of research. It also allows for the classification of sexual behavior. For Money, the concept of threshold has great value because of the wide spectrum to which it applies. "It allows one to think developmentally or longitudinally, in terms of stages or experiences that are programmed serially, or hierarchically, or cybernetically (i.e. regulated by mutual feedback)." (Oxford 1988: 116)"

"Further information: Sexual identityGender identity, and Gender role

Money introduced numerous definitions related to gender in journal articles in the 1950s, many of them as a result of his studies of Hermaphroditism.

Money's definition of gender is based on his understanding of sex differences among human beings. According to Money, the fact that one sex produces ova and the other sex produces sperm is the irreducible criterion of sex difference. However, there are other sex-derivative differences that follow in the wake of this primary dichotomy.

These differences involve the way urine is expelled from the human body and other questions of sexual dimorphism. According to Money's theory, sex-adjunctive differences are typified by the smaller size of females and their problems in moving around while nursing infants. This then makes it more likely that the males do the roaming and hunting.

Sex-arbitrary differences are those that are purely conventional: for example, color selection (baby blue for boys, pink for girls). Some of the latter differences apply to life activities, such as career opportunities for men versus women.

Finally, Money created the now-common term gender role which he differentiated from the concept of the more traditional terminology sex role. This grew out of his studies of hermaphrodites. According to Money, the genitalia and erotic sexual roles were now, by his definition, to be included under the more general term "gender role" including all the non-genital and non-erotic activities that are defined by the conventions of society to apply to males or to females.

In his studies of hermaphrodites, Money found that there are six variables that define sex. While in the average person all six would line up unequivocally as either all "male" or "female", in hermaphrodites any one or more than one of these could be inconsistent with the others, leading to various kinds of anomalies. In his seminal 1955 paper he defined these factors as:

  1. assigned sex and sex of rearing
  2. external genital morphology
  3. internal reproductive structures
  4. hormonal and secondary sex characteristics
  5. gonadal sex
  6. chromosomal sex

and added,

"Patients showing various combinations and permutations of these six sexual variables may be appraised with respect to a seventh variable:

7. Gender role and orientation as male or female, established while growing up." 

He then defined gender role as

"all those things that a person says or does to disclose himself or herself as having the status of boy or man, girl or woman, respectively. It includes, but is not restricted to sexuality in the sense of eroticism. Gender role is appraised in relation to the following: general mannerisms, deportment and demeanor; play preferences and recreational interests; spontaneous topics of talk in unprompted conversation and casual comment; content of dreams, daydreams and fantasies; replies to oblique inquiries and projective tests; evidence of erotic practices, and, finally, the person's own replies to direct inquiry."

Money made the concept of gender a broader, more inclusive concept than one of masculine/feminine.

For him, gender included not only one's status as a man or a woman, but was also a matter of personal recognition, social assignment, or legal determination; not only on the basis of one's genitalia but also on the basis of somatic and behavioral criteria that go beyond genital differences.

In 1972, Money presented his theories in Man & Woman, Boy & Girl, a college-level, mainstream textbook. The book featured David Reimer (see below) as an example of gender reassignment."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

Legendary Acts of Perversion:

"In 2000, David and his twin brother (Brian) alleged that Money forced the twins to rehearse sexual acts involving "thrusting movements", with David playing the bottom role. He said as a child, Money forced him go "down on all fours" with his brother, Brian Reimer, "up behind his butt" with "his crotch against" his "buttocks", and that Money forced David to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections". On at "least one occasion", Money reportedly took photographs of the two children doing these activities. Money's rationale for these various treatments was his belief that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play'" was important for a "healthy adult gender identity". "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Controversies

Money is one messed up dude, whether all the stories are true or not, his published work is perverted nonsense and not science.

A Legally Binding Post Script:

I believe in less governmental authority not more. I think adults are free to enter into whatever adult relationships they like, and that we are free to "marry" who we like. But marriage itself is a social institutional illusion that has little to actually do with mating for life. Marriage is a social institution currently based on romantic love rather than contrived family commercially motivated affairs. And this institution is used as a means and tool of governmental control. We esssentially need government permission to marry and divorce. We need to pay the system for the privilege, Money makes this mad world "spin" itself dizzy, after all.

We exist to serve government and any liberty we gain is not freedom. Freedom is not granted. Freedom is our natural state and you are free to fall in love with who you fall in love with. You are free to be attracted to who you are attracted to. None of this defines you. Identity itself is a convenient social construct lie. The 21st century is an era of a digitally reinforced gender based identity campaign that seeks to further define our reality for us. 

We need simple local controlled bureaucracies that serve us. We can then use a human system to simply keep track of our own personal agreements and contracts, without all the needless fees, fines, jail time and governmental permission. We basically seek permission to marry and seek permission to divorce, from state or religion it matters not. Both are the same, one just makes liberal us of the fear of guns to enforce its will.

 

Gay marriage relies on more governmental authority not less. This issue was used to grow Federal government power.

We need a lot less of the federal, state and county governments. In fact we need none of it. We need local controlled bureaucracies that actually serve humanity.

It would really be a good idea to free ourselves from the seemingly endless divide and conquer politics and to bend government to our collective will by turning it into something we have local control over.

You are not your social security number, you are not the name on your governmental issued papers. We are not human resource meant to be exploited by our own kind. We are free human beings. We are not our choices and identities are convenient social fictions and nothing more. Identity politics takes many forms and the "straight" and "LGBT" labels are just another form of officially approved and crafted, shallow and meaningless identity product. The government is interested into getting us to sort ourselves into easily managed communities and really does not sell true tolerance. The news media and the rest of the Hollywood babel is the real weapon that the military uses to keep us the mass public, docile.

Gay, straight, transgender and the rest of the labels are an insult to humanity itself we would all be better off without.

We must stop allowing government to take advantage of our natures. They bait and switch us instead of staying out of our business; they only seek to get further involved with what each of us does and thinks and believes. The road to hell and wage enslavement is paved with some of the best intent after all, but the fact is governments serve international banking interests and not any of us.

Growing The Federal Beast: The "Supreme" Law Of The Land

"Anthony McLeod Kennedy (born July 23, 1936) is the senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States who was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on November 11, 1987, and took the oath of office on February 18, 1988.

Kennedy became the most senior Associate Justice on the court following the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016.[2][3] Since the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006, he has been the swing vote on many of the Court's 5–4 decisions. He has authored the majority ruling in many of these cases, including Lawrence v. Texas, Boumediene v. Bush, Citizens United v. FEC, and Obergefell v. Hodges."

"Two years later, Kennedy authored the majority ruling in the decision of Obergefell v. Hodges, which holds that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry nationwide. The closing paragraph of Kennedy's ruling has been used by many couples in their marriage vows: 

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were."

Anthony Kennedy - Wikipedia