A Proper Gander At Propaganda

Truth Transcends Community

"Propaganda in the United States is spread by both government and media entities. Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to influence opinions. It's used in advertising, radio, newspaper, posters, books, television, and other media."  -  Propaganda in the United States - Wikipedia

"A man without a government is like a fish without a bicycle.” Alvaro Koplovich

Article index

BREAKING NEWS: Beware Youtube Conspiracy Gossip Gurus

 


BREAKING NEWS:

...this just in... sorry to interrupt your regularly scheduled blog article...this just in... sorry to interrupt your regularly scheduled blog article...


updated 9:44 PM GMT November 21, 2017

Editorial updated with more DARPA information and now the "breaking" Disney/Pixar scandal as well! An Imagineer goes down.



AA Morris Gossip.gif

Presents the Power of 21st Century Gossip

The Same Old News Reimagined on Politically Programmed Spin & Endless Repeat Cycle

image source: Disney's 1943 Chicken Little

(Please excuse any babel-like typos you may encounter, auto spell correct demonstrates why claims of artificial intelligence and self driving cars are currently lies.)



Please Excuse This Blog Article Interruption:

This An Emergency Message!

Washington's Doomsday Clock clicked an infinitesimal step towards midnight, oh what a fright!

Ever notice how the world is always ending? It's always 1999 party time, in the world of never ending News spin and repeat cycle.


"Gossip Can Help Your Company Innovate Better"

"Yes, you read the title of this article correctly. Gossip – or rather informal communication networks in organisations – can help organisations like yours innovate better. In particular, gossip can help you in three ways: firstly to test new ideas prior to implementation in order to identify potential problems; secondly to identify the cause of bottlenecks after implementation; and thirdly as a propaganda tool."

source: Gossip Can Help Your Company Innovate Better - Jeffrey Baumgartner

Social Media is medium for Gossip

"...SMISC is yet another example of how the military is becoming very interested in what's going on in the social media sphere. DARPA has plans to integrate social media data into its manhunt master controller, Insight. NATO has already been paying keen attention to Twitter, using data from the micro-blogging service as an intel source to aid in bomb targeting decisions. DARPA's presolicitation offers a very vaguely-sourced anecdote spelling out how SMISC could be used. It details how a social media rumor about the location of a particularly reviled individual – identity and location undisclosed – almost led a lynch mob to storm a house in search of him. Authorities who happened to be paying attention to the Internet rumor were fortunate enough to spot it in time to intervene. In this telling of SMISC's potential applications, the software could be used to as a tripwire to stop potentially dangerous social media campaigns in their tracks."

source: Pentagon Wants a Social Media Propaganda Machine | WIRED


This editorial takes a look at one of the most powerful mind altering and addictive mediums of all, gossip.

Verbal and even visual claims are not proof of anything but perhaps a propaganda campaign.

Modern government and News media make liberal use of the power of electronic media. Gossip is the medium of government.

Modern social media, radio, print and television are powerful mind altering drugs most of us are addicted to.

Many of us are addicted to the gossip the various media brings to our consciousness. We all get addicted to various habits. Life is addicting. As human beings we can't help ourselves. Most are not addicted to some kind of self educating process, like some of us clearly are. Most are not addicted to self improvement like those who work out or create art. Seventy year old rock stars would seem to be addicted to stage and the tour, for example. I know my addictions, some are healthier than others. Shopping seems to be an encouraged addiction, does it not? As does all the sports and other forms of bread and circus addiction, officially sponsored by the likes of U.S. government and Coca Cola.

In any case, the subject of this article is addiction to empty and mind altering poison. Gossip is the medium of government. Hearsay, speculative myth, tales of sainted martyrs and all the rest, date back well into the mists of unknown historical past. Civilization, at least how we understand it, seems to rely on the use of very specific techniques. These include the use of shepherding icons with dramatically important narratives to sell, who demonstrate why we should be wary of idolatry.

There is no logical reason to trust Chicken Little Government and Boy Who Cries Wolf News Media.
These sources have means, motive and opportunity to lie and a long history of doing so. I know we all have grown up in the electronic media environment and most of us just assume the News all as real as advertised. The reality, which is discoverable with a little online Google search box, elbow grease, is that the real weapon of mass destruction of governmental might is the electronic screen and radio media. The News and Government are run from the top down with Hollywood as one big propaganda weapon and always has been. This too is easily confirmed. There is no logical reason to ever think stories presented on screens are anything but allegations and claims. Logically all these edited products can ever be are claims, not evidence. The media and government rely on blurring that important distinction. This is why all we can do is use News media accounts as evidence of fakery. We can point out obvious problems with mainstream narratives that the News media and government clearly ignore. But even were we to have, a believable shooting presented to us, for example, complete with real tears and running noses, we'd be most unwise to buy into the reality presented by screen and official government and News media account. Even the most believable News story is not evidence and even the most believable victim interview is not proof of anything but  a propaganda campaign. Media promoted allegations are not evidence of anything no matter how realistically presented.


A Warning of Sorts: It Is Wise To Never Trust Self Proclaimed "Most Trusted" News Sources

As more people become aware of the obvious problems we can use to demonstrate that a News story is fake, we should be aware that the Military minds behind such operations could easily design a scenario that comes across as completely believable in every imagined way. These people run the show and control the major institutions. The way the United States is structured post-911 (especially) seems to indicate that even hospitals and coroners and yes even funeral homes can be all part of the show. We know that there are really believable crisis actors who are used for real EMT training sessions and we do know their are actors and actresses out there who can really cry for the cameras. We know that there are live action stuntmen and women who risk life and limb for their careers and we know that there are plenty of actors and actresses who have signed on the dotted line to do the same with their images.

If Charlottesville and Vegas are any indication, there is some evidence to suggest that an effort is being made to present more believable stories to the public. This includes even interactive funeral experiences and vigils, country music concerts and so much more. Things like coroner reports and death records and what the hospital claims or does not claim can all be controlled and that information can all be manipulated by those with the authority to do so. The JFK assassination hoax would be an example of that level of fakery.


"Testing New Ideas in the Gossip Mill'

"By putting information about an innovative new idea into the office gossip mill, managers can: get warning of staff concerns about the idea; learn in advance where there are likely to be problems; and determine who may intentionally or unintentionally disrupt an idea's implementation. This information can be used in designing an implementation plan and, in particular, helping minimise the disruption that the introduction of a new idea often brings"

quote source: Gossip Can Help Your Company Innovate Better - Jeffrey Baumgartner


Television Is A Participatory Experience: Today, Social Media Is Even More Immersive

This short section of this late 1960's News broadcast is worth watching. You might want to watch this. It is very revealing. Televisions has always sold an augmented reality to its endless audience of newly minted brand new human minds who, like myself, were born into this world of electronic screens. I always thought the television screen some kind of teaching device, little diid I suspect, for decades of my existence, that it was, demonstrably, an indoctrination device.

By the way, whether he knew it or not, this man was lying to the home viewing audience. Consider how people tend to put their mental defenses down, and are in a more suggestible state, when they are home, relaxing after work, watching the aptly termed 'idiot box'. Television News has hypnotized generations of human minds.

Television News Presents "An Ongoing Experience"

'War' is a Hoax !....Just Like 'Space-Travel' ! .....  source: hristos mandylor


Edited imagery with authoritative voice over is just another form of gossip.


Gossip is Governmental Poison

Hollywood, Government, the Military, and the News Media are demonstrably unreliable sources of information.

This should be obvious to any working adult or even child mind, My children can see how through some of this stuff.

The sound of parrot song begins to drive AA Morris crazy.

Repeating so-called 'facts", especially out of context, and without looking at underlying suppositions, is foolish to say the least.

I can't listen to many of the podcasts I used to. I can't help but notice all the unquestioned bullshit they sling. One assumption after another is vocalized without any thought as to whether or not the assumption is correct in the first place. They come across as if they really think they are right, when it is obvious they are very wrong. I can't listen to the arrogant chuckles of those who think themselves wiser, more educated and more intelligent than they obviously are. These minds present themselves as serious "researchers" and knowledgable folk when in fact all they demonstrate is a willingness to be witting or unwitting agents of mind twisting propaganda. I can't listen to another podcaster pontificate about Hollywood's detrimental effect on culture and how evil pornography is. For people who claim to think pornography evil, these minds sure spend a lot of time dwelling and obsessing over it. In the same way these same voices verbalize how Hollywood celebrity culture is poison and yet all they do is spend their time focused on talking about and passing on celebrity gossip and hearsay as if it was fact.  This seems like just another way to push just a another form of needless celebrity based fascination. These folk never take the conversation past a certain point and in this manner they promote ignorance. These people love to pass on Hollywood and governmental, and military myth as gospel fact, without qualification and without any reference to even the possibility that the events discussed could be just hoaxes and theatrical propaganda. It makes me wonder if these researchers are for real or just performing some kind of obvious and clichéd act. Let's take Corey Feldman as one example of many of the celebrities some of these minds seem to relish discussing the lives of. This dude runs to the media to make his claims. He does not run to the proper authorities. There is absolutely no evidence to support his accounts. There is no reason at all to think he has offered any proof of any criminal activity at all. All we have are his allegations and the claims of whatever other actors are playing along with what seems to be an obvious con job. The media is not the proper forum for any of this. We have simply been conditioned by the same media to accept streams of illogical witness and victim interviews as normal. Consider too that anyone who makes public claims against specific individuals would seem to be opening themselves up for libel lawsuits. There are also other logical problems with mass media press trials and "investigations" that any working mind should not fail to see and consider. The News media is simply not the investigative body its advertising claims. It does not deserve the reputation that its own advertising and marketing material sell and this too is as obvious as me claiming grass green and the sky blue.

The News media is not the proper forum for allegations of real crime, I know we have been long conditioned to truly believe otherwise, this is a mistake.

The News media is not some official authority in that context. The News media has no obligation to tell us anything. The News media is little more than weather, sports scores, some local news that may or may not be filtered and may or may not be as true as advertised, and huge helpings of National News propaganda product, which includes huge helpings of Hollywood celebrity gossip and other forms of shallow media promoted social shepherding. The sad thing is that even local city News is bound to be fake as cities have big governmental needs, which can be met with obvious means, motive and opportunity. The pre 9/11 News world was fake enough. Today's post 9/11 News world is not really any less real as much as these stories seem to have multiplied in number, there seems to be more post 9/11 fake News military style, operations than before 9/1`1. The obvious answer would seem to have to do with all the Patriot Act and related Homeland Security FEMA drilling nonsense. This is the modern equivalent of the old Cold War era duck and cover nonsense of course. Nothing like operant conditioning is there? How does it feel to realize that you are an artificial intelligence product of a long standing con job, internationally managed, royal banking enterprise? All of these fake News stories create the false environmental perception that we need to keep toiling away, paying taxes, fees, fines and perhaps even having to face some jail time, all in support for it all. After all, we must truly have faith that we need all the layers of needless governmental intervention in our lives that we clearly and demonstrably do to need.

We have been programmed by society, we are the real "Artificial Intelligences".

Media saturated babies are now middle aged adults and some us of see the electronic medium for what it is.

The many would always seem to have been literally programmed by the few going back as far as we can tell. In many ways these new modern mass communication tools are updated and even more powerful Church pulpits. Modern science and Big Pharma backed modern medicine has demonstrably a more powerful hold over human imagination than officially labeled religions currently do. Most of us really do not notice that we all have al been indoctrinated, since birth, in what can only be best described as a huge, world wide, cult.

Those of us born post World War Two have grown up in a electronic communications saturated world that nearly all of us media consuming 'addicts' had taken for granted at least up until 9/11 started to wake some of us up. Thankfully 9/11 was a bad idea. In my opinion the powers that be should not have gone through with their seeming long planned Twin Tower 2001 Coptic New Year's Demolitions Day. In my opinion the Military Industrial Entertainment News Media Masters were and still are, playing from an old and obvious playbook that they should have abandoned as soon as Youtube went online. Funny that the Alphabet company, the parent of Google and Youtube, would seem to be aptly named and a government agency reference. Whatever the deal is, the fact is between wikipedia, Google, Youtube and archive.org, (as examples) we can do a lot of really in depth research, in a very short amount of time, with no research staffing needs, that would have been impossible before this era of a wonderful lightning fast hyperlinked world-wide library we call the internet.

We can never use the News media to prove anything other than they are lying to the public. We can find mistakes and telltale signs of fakery that go a long way to show that a News story is a hoax. We can point out obvious contradictions that invariably arise in those stories. A lot of the time the contradictions and coincidences become ridiculously overwhelming.


Endless Conspiracy Mazes Are Obvious Mousetraps Best Avoided

The gossip obsessed, conspiracy guru will take you on all sorts of celebrity like tours, both literal and actual. Maybe there's a convention, maybe there's a self proclaimed genius dude who does some kind of small soirée for a selected faithful few, like Alan Watts used to hold on his houseboat, during the swinging Sausalito 60's. There's always UFO and secret space program conventions to attend, with promise of eternal revelation around every corner. Maybe even some gurus promise some kind of paradigm altering revolution that will finally take down NASA. The audience for this kind of product, seem to truly love gate kept conspiracy mazes, it's like a mental Disneyland they never leave. For most people, these "mysteries" are entertainment more than education.

Zapruder+Film+Hoax+2.gif

The Zapruder Film is just a photographic cartoon: Where are the reflections of the ladies?

Where are the reflections of the line of ladies who were supposed to be out there in the plaza waiting for their charismatic leader to arrive? Instead of the faces of the onlooking women reflected towards camera eye lens, we have what clearly appears to be a line of cars. It looks like the motorcade itself is projected onto the side of the limousine. Simply scroll down to the bottom of this website or see the article index for more, if you are interested.

Or you can click right here: The Zapruder Film Is Just A Photographic Cartoon for more.

Consider all the guys who supposedly examined every frame of the Zapurder film but failed to notice the wrong reflections on the limousine doors. These dudes claimed to be photographic experts. Consider too, two big JFK conspiracy names, Olive Stone and Jim Garrison are both obvious, deceptive, propagandists. Garrison's biography explains he worked for the FBI and was former military. He then went on to become a professional JFK conspiracy gatekeeper who seems to be instrumental in getting that ball rolling along. Consider how much media coverage that dude always got, right from the start and why, and consider too that New Orleans itself is like another governmental, live action role playing, News crafting, Federalized Disneyland. One of many. Just like Los Angeles, New York and all the rest, including, of course Washington D.C. itself. In some ways, these cities are more like huge film sets for News to use to create false reality to sell to the gullible public.

Washington DC.jpg

Gossip: A Powerful Governmental Propaganda Tool

The medium of which is the witting and unwitting human tongue.

"Before implementing and introducing an innovation that will cause significant change to your organisation, you could mention to a key person or two that you are deeply concerned about how employees will accept the innovation and the change it will bring. You only hope that employees will recognise the value of the innovation to the survival and growth of the company and so accept the necessary change. You believe they will. You have a great team. You can be sure this gossip will spread around the company in no time. But, because it is gossip and not a formal announcement, people are more likely to accept the gossip as being more authentic than an official announcement. As a result, it is also more likely that people will buy into the value of the innovation and so be accepting of the necessary change. Alternatively, if people start moaning, management you have information you can use to change the way you introduce the innovation. You may even need to rethink how you implement the innovation."

quote source: Gossip Can Help Your Company Innovate Better - Jeffrey Baumgartner

"Inside DARPA, The Pentagon Agency Whose Technology Has 'Changed the World' "

The Real 20th Century Governmental Weapon of Mass Terrorism: Mass Electronic Media

"WEINBERGER: Well, two things happened. Eisenhower was very heavily influenced by his science advisers. And they lobbied heavily to have a civil, you know, a civilian agency for space. So Eisenhower, when he authorized the creation of DARPA - or ARPA at the time - he specifically said that when a civilian agency is created - which was to be NASA - that the civil rocket and satellite programs would move out of DARPA and over to this new agency. But it was expected at the time that DARPA would keep the military space programs. Well, within a year and a half, that didn't happen. There was a bureaucratic war in the Pentagon. And the military services - the Army, Navy and Air Force - got their programs back. So you suddenly had, you know, it's 1959, this agency isn't even two years old and it's left without its main mission and sort of adrift at sea.

GROSS: So what did it do?

WEINBERGER: What DARPA had at the time was a man who eventually rose to be deputy director. And his name was William Godel. He was actually not a scientist or a scientific manager. He was an intelligence operative who'd been put at DARPA in the early days to represent the interests of the spy community, of the intelligence community. And so he looked at this young agency that now didn't really have a mission. And he thought, well, maybe we can mold this agency around the strategic threats that I see. And he looked out at the world. And for him, the space race was mostly a psychological game. You know, it was public relations. The threat of nuclear Armageddon, no matter how big a threat, was not a likely scenario. He had had a lot of experience in Asia, particularly Southeast Asia. And he looked at countries like the Philippines and particularly the Vietnam. And he thought the most likely way the United States would confront the Soviet Union would be through the sort of proxy wars, where the United States would have - would back regimes fighting Communist insurgencies. And he thought we could take DARPA to Vietnam."

source: Inside DARPA, The Pentagon Agency Whose Technology Has - NPR

DARPA - Wikipedia  •  Military science: Masters of war : Nature : Nature Research  •  How an Agency of Oddballs Transformed Modern War and Modern Life /

 

Do you remember when the world didn't end?

Six years and counting and all the Chicken Little online podcasting claims of radiation death have turned out to be nothing but hot air. What other end of the world dangers and geopolitical threats do the online hens constantly cluck about? Which kind of YouTube channel do you suppose gets more views? The ones about tabloid dangers and the ones that sell yellow journal nonsense in the guise of "alternative" news or those that reveal the social engineering for what it is?

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster - Wikipedia


Online Guerrilla Marketing Warning!

Ever notice how Flat Earth YouTube gurus seems to end up selling you on buying a camera or telescope?

None of this can be used to prove the Earth flat, by the way. Is the shape of the world really that important anyway? If you think the world best described flat, that's your perception to self manage. I do not have to agree with your model choice and you need not agree with mine. I do not think we should confuse models with reality like we've been long conditioned by gossip based electronic media to do so.

Flat or globe or doughnut or skateboard course shaped Earth, the shape of the world is not as important as buying $500 cameras and purchasing telescopes to look up at the sky in a distracted haze, just like superstitious folk have always done. Whether the stars were counted to tell one's fortune, the future of an enterprise or even now counting those stars as suns with orbiting worlds that need to be mapped. The space programs of the world are fake and exist to act as medium of atomic death. Never forget that. Online gurus might even invoke religion and "God" in fallacious attempt to maintain the maze. Nobody can have a relationship with the Divine Creator or Creative Force (however you imagine or think it to be) for you. God is an idea that refers us to the mysterious and obvious logical need for some kind of source of existence. How you choose to define that is your birthright. A current divide and conquer tactic is to try to use religion as a wedge issue, whether it is the old antisemitic card or the atheist vs religious faithful card. All are false choices that lead nowhere and we can prove that. Religions are slave systems and are no different from government. In many real ways they are one and the same thing.

Online Hens Peck Away At Collective Common Sense

By the way, the online conspiracy maze includes trips to the poles, trips to inner Earth and all sorts of endless unverifiable speculation to get lost in. We might want to avoid spending too much time speculating over things we cannot verify like hiding large land masses and the rest. At this point none of us can do anything about any of that but talk and speculate and spread gossip like most podcasters seem to do. Perhaps there is nothing to really go and see but some ice. Perhaps there are no great resources in Antartcia to exploit.

In my opinion, it is clear that the motions of the heavens, the rising and setting of the celestial phenomena are best described with a motionless globe model. Your perceptions are yours to worry about and if you want to buy camera equipment, go right ahead and do so. Perhaps you might want to consider that the shape of the world is an interesting, but somewhat pointless question to get lost in exploring. It is easier to demonstrate all the video evidence of NASA's fakery and it seems to me to make more sense pointing out flaws in heliocentric based theory and take it not much further than that. That is my opinion, you obviously have your own and should keep it until you prove otherwise to yourself. I am as suspicious of Flat Earth community building efforts as I am suspicious off all such endeavors. The stars were used with mechanical clocks, to aid sailors in navigating the world. The stars also always have been used to distract human minds for a long time. 

International space programs are all fake. All run by the same international banking mafia that manage the world for Holy Roman Enterprising Related Royalty who still sit on too many thrones. The world is legally bound with mind numbing and spell binding paperwork. This trail of contracts, treaties, constitutions, laws and and lease companies and all the rest of intentional and international Byzantine maze like banking that lies at the heart of civilization as we know it, leads to the conclusion, that the Royals still own the rights to the international - wold staged theater to this day.


"PENTAGON WANTS A SOCIAL MEDIA PROPAGANDA MACHINE"

7•15•2011

"You don't need to have 5,000 friends of Facebook to know that social media can have a notorious mix of rumor, gossip and just plain disinformation. The Pentagon is looking to build a tool to sniff out social media propaganda campaigns and spit some counter-spin right back at it. On Thursday, Defense Department extreme technology arm DARPA unveiled its Social Media in Strategic Communication(SMISC) program. It's an attempt to get better at both detecting and conducting propaganda campaigns on social media. SMISC has two goals. First, the program needs to help the military better understand what's going on in social media in real time – particularly in areas where troops are deployed. Second, Darpa wants SMISC to help the military play the social media propaganda game itself. This is more than just checking the trending topics on Twitter. The Defense Department wants to deeply grok social media dynamics. So SMISC algorithms will be aimed at discovering and tracking the "formation, development and spread of ideas and concepts (memes)" on social media, according to Darpa's announcement."

"More specifically, SMISC needs to be able to seek out "persuasion campaign structures and influence operations" developing across the social sphere. SMISC is supposed to quickly flag rumors and emerging themes on social media, figure out who's behind it and what. Moreover, DARPA wants SMISC to be able to actually figure out whether this is a random product of the hivemind or a propaganda operation by an adversary nation or group. ... SMISC is yet another example of how the military is becoming very interested in what's going on in the social media sphere. Darpa has plans to integrate social media data into its manhunt master controller, Insight. NATO has already been paying keen attention to Twitter, using data from the micro-blogging service as an intel source to aid in bomb targeting decisions. DARPA's presolicitation offers a very vaguely-sourced anecdote spelling out how SMISC could be used. It details how a social media rumor about the location of a particularly reviled individual – identity and location undisclosed – almost led a lynch mob to storm a house in search of him. Authorities who happened to be paying attention to the Internet rumor were fortunate enough to spot it in time to intervene. In this telling of SMISC's potential applications, the software could be used to as a tripwire to stop potentially dangerous social media campaigns in their tracks."

source: Pentagon Wants a Social Media Propaganda Machine | WIRED

"DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the area of social media in strategic communication. Proposed research should investigate innovative approaches that enable revolutionary advances in science, devices, or systems. Specifically excluded is research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of practice."

source: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=6ef12558b44258382452fcf02942396a&tab=core&_cview=0


And now a message from our sponsor:

News From Nowhere.gif

"News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein

Ever wonder how cultural sausage is made? Wonder no longer. Want to know the secret of the secret sauce? Here's a hint, it's bullshit.

Get yourself a copy today. Seriously. "News From Nowhere" is an excellent and insightful read. I really do highly recommend it. It explains how and why the News is not as real as advertised, to say the least, from the perspective of the late 1960's and early 1970's, a very foundational era for television News. AA Morris.

News from Nowhere, by Edward Jay Epstein | commentary   •    News From Nowhere - The New York Times  •  News from Nowhere Redux: Television and the News by Edward Jay ...

"When "Television" covered its first war in Vietnam, it showed a terrible truth of war in a manner new to mass audiences. A case can be made, and certainly should be examined, that this was cardinal to the disillusionment of Americans with this war..."

source: page 9, "News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein

“The public image of American journalism has always included a good proportion of myth. Well before the Second World War, Broadway and Hollywood had made the stereotype of the Intrepid Reporter—dogged in his pursuit of the truth, fearless in his determination to see it printed—nearly as familiar as the white hats that identified the good guys in a Western. The war made legends out of such foreign correspondents as Ernie Pyle and Margaret Bourke-White; in the cold-war years that followed, with their prolonged emphasis on foreign affairs, the image of the newspaper correspondent came to be fixed in a new stereotype, but one every bit as solid, and as favorable, as the old one of Hollywood. Television was at first merely an instrument of this myth, but in the mid-1950s it grew to be something more. With the development of national network news programs, the legend came to life."

source: News from Nowhere, by Edward Jay Epstein | commentary


"News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein

"Another commonly used device for generating film about an event to which television cameras are not privy is re-enacting the happening. This usually involves having participants act out for the cameras after the fact the part they played in a news event. In this practice, however, the line between what constitutes "staged" news as opposed to a legitimate reconstruction is not always clear. For example, in its documentary on "The Selling of the Pentagon," CBS criticized the Department of Defense for staging the landings of South Vietnamese river patrols for conveniently placed cameramen (since it was known there were no enemy troops in the vicinity). Yet a former Saigon bureau chief pointed out that "it is considered standard operating procedures for troops to fire their weapons for the benefit of cameramen. If our cameramen had to wait until a fire fight with the Vietcong broke out , we'd have much less footage - and perhaps, cameramen."

quote source: page 158, "News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein

Faking Images of War

The government and the military, Hollywood and the News media cannot be trusted. Here's what I know of Vietnam, (make of this what you will, as this is a form of gossip) my wife's uncle served and was apparently involved in some kind of combat incident that resulted in soldiers dying. I also had a friend who served in 1991's Desert Storm who heard the sounds of battle but saw no combat himself, which to me now sounds like he might have been subjected to a Ghost Army style simulation. What we have to realize is that the Military and government only let the News media tell us what they want us to know. They control their mouthpieces with obvious National Security law. The Military employs socially manipulative, deceptive tactics in order to wisely avoid battle; and their main battlefield seems to be the human mind. We are supposed to really have faith in governmental protection we pay taxes for. This is how the real war against humanity itself is continuously "won".

Clearly the Government and the Military wanted the American public to turn against the Vietnam war. This original televised war reinforced the very false notion that the News media had some kind of independence from government it does not really have. Watergate would seal this deal in the mid 1970's.

My view on war is simply this, helicopters and guns are real and so are bullets. A lot of war imagery and supposed war history is fake and just Hollywood Newsreel propaganda fiction. This does not mean that real people did not and do not get involved in real combat or anything like that. It does not mean accidents did not and do not happen. What it means is that the government only tries to show us what meets their agenda and tries to avoid showing us anything else. If something slips past the censor like filter, the rest of the noise machine is more than capable of drowning out and otherwise ignoring inconvenient facts. I would consider the Ghost Army a fable were it not for all the obvious modern fakery that would seem to reflect the exact same modus operandi. Context matters and if you are are regular reader of this blog you know its focus is on how Hollywood and the News media have always been propaganda weapons of military and government that have always been used to craft a false reality for the public to buy into. War image fakery is as old as civilization itself. Its original form was word of mouth hearsay or basic gossip.

Ghost Army - Wikipedia


Saturday Evenings Live

"The ordinary man as the Saturday Evening Post has discovered, thinks in concrete images, pictures, and parables. He finds it difficult to read a long article unless it is dramatized, and it takes the form of what newspapers call a "story." "News story" and "fiction story" are two forms of modern literature that are now so like one another that it is sometimes difficult to distinguish them."

quote source: page 241, "News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein


The Mainstream News Media Peddles The Most Pornography To a General Audience

Penthouse and Playboy got nothing on the mainstream News media. The News media gets a free pass and is allowed to constantly dwell on many explicit subjects it should not. The News media ends up exposing young children to very adult topics.


Got To Pay Taxes For Needless Protection From Phantom Menaces

The Military needs us to really believe it possess super powers it does not actually possess. Existential fear fuels endless economy. Wars are not quite as real as advertised.

Vietnam Fake War.jpg
Fake War.jpg

Full Metal Jacket: Regarding The Vietnam War

“Most troops were never involved in fighting. ...Very few people saw action.”

quote source: Stanley Kubrick

Stanley Kubrick explains how his extensive research revealed most soldiers saw no combat in Vietnam. Please listen to this interview and consider how illogical it would be for the Military to be concerned with documenting battles with film crews. I'm of the opinion that real battles do not get filmed for obvious reasons that include not wanting to show anyone how real war is conducted, besides that, the logistics of shooting real war footage would seem to make such an undertaking unnecessarily dangerous. Why bother when they could easily fake it? Most people accept edited video footage with authoritative voice over as reality so there's no reason for them to bother trying to record real battles, or so it seems to me.

A Voix Nue: Stanley Kubrick (Rare Radio Interview)  source: Obscure437


"The horrors of war entered the living rooms of Americans for the first time during the Vietnam War.:

"For almost a decade in between school, work, and dinners, the American public could watch villages being destroyed, Vietnamese children burning to death, and American body bags being sent home. Though initial coverage generally supported U.S involvement in the war, television news dramatically changed its frame of the war after the Tet Offensive. Images of the U.S led massacre at My Lai dominated the television, yet the daily atrocities committed by North Vietnam and the Viet Cong rarely made the evening news. Moreover, the anti-war movement at home gained increasing media attention while the U.S soldier was forgotten in Vietnam. Coverage of the war and its resulting impact on public opinion has been debated for decades by many intelligent media scholars and journalists, yet they are not the most qualified individuals to do so: the veterans are. Journalists based in Saigon daily reported facts about battles, casualties, and the morale of the troops, yet only a soldier could grasp the true reality of war. Veterans understand what really occurred in the jungles of Vietnam, and only they can compare the truth to what was portrayed on television. Furthermore, their homecoming stories most accurately reveal how the American public has cruelly mistreated the Vietnam veteran. Therefore, after having researched the power of television and its coverage of the war, I interviewed four Vietnam veterans in order to understand how they interpreted the coverage and how they feel it contributed to the image of the Vietnam Veteran."

sources: The first television war - Television    •   https://www.warbirdforum.com/media.htm


"Another commonly used device for generating film about an event to which television cameras are not privy is re-enacting the happening. ...In this practice, however, the line between what constitutes "staged" news as opposed to a legitimate reconstruction is not always clear." 

source: source: page 158, "News From Nowhere" by Edward Jay Epstein


While Nero Fiddles a Fiery Striptease Song The Holy Roman Enterprise™ Grows

Distracting conspiracy media mazes would seem to act like dead end mousetraps. While conspiracy pundits spend lifetimes pontificating, politicians craft real laws.

Have we learned nothing from events like the fake JFK assassination? The mainstream media, including and especially the News media seemingly seeks to spend the rest of eternity selling us all various forms of official, semi official and secretly official conspiracy nonsense in P.T. Barnum fashion that the public sure seems to newer grow tired of consuming like banana republic cargo cult flavored Coca Cola. Sideshow carnival freak salesmen con artists proclaim revelations around every corner, and yet all that is ever revealed is allegorical secret doors that lead to more metaphorical tunnels in an endless Dungeons and Dragons maze of contrived - super spy - childish nonsense.


Isn't it better and perhaps a bit more wise to tell people that the television News broadcasts a whole lot of lies?

The official 9/11 story is obvious Warner Brothers cartoon joke. History is demonstrably more unverifiable fable than actual fact. None of these ideas are new and in fact all are to be found in various forms of official mainstream media. None of this is conspiracy theorizing at all. Yet most people either prefer official accounts as reality or if they find problems with those, they end up caught in a conspiracy maze, never considering the possibility that the mysterious event in question was simply a hoax.


Electronic Broadcasted Mind Altering Punditry Is Nothing New

The mindless televised pundit parroting of empty memes derived form broadcast sources is as least as old as the Vietnam war era when admittedly staged images of war were shown to the home viewing audience with daily vigor. Talking heads pundits would appear on screen, seated round table style, pontificating about geopolitical struggles that seem to occur endlessly to this day. The world is always ready to end and their are always victimized people in need of defending. There's always a call to join one kind of Pied Piper pilgrimage march on Washington D.C. or another, mental or actual. Online pundits play the same propaganda game today. Nothing is new and nothing fundamental really changes. People are always being told the world needs saving, when all that needs saving are the individual misled human minds.


Repeating Unverifiable Claims is Good For Business!

How many podcasts are out there that cover conspiracy topics? How many cover MK Ultra mind control victim manipulation subjects? How many podcasts seem obsessed with talking endlessly about various aspects of celebrity culture? How many repeat speculative musings and obvious Hollywood myth and unverifiable claims along as if proven fact? Ever notice how none of it leads anywhere? How long have more high profile people like Alex Jones been out there claiming the world will end in one way or another? How many lesser online 'Alex Jones" wannabes have prophesied that civilization or culture would end? How many of you recall the online promoted nonsense regarding the Aztec calendar and the imagined 2012 end of the world? This online meme was a reimagined version of the mainstream News media promoted Y2K bug that famously ended the world back in 1999, when all computer records were lost due to the predicted programming doom. Oh yea that never happened. In fact nothing did. Computer life went on after the last day of 1999 was over and life went on after 2012 ended, all reality warping internet promoted Mandela nonsensical noise to the contrary. The online media world is just an electrically updated version of the same old tabloid press with the same old tired tabloid style nonsense sold as rational thought.

The Pied Piper Wants You To Pitch In To Save The Poor Souls in Desperate Eternal Need

Here's a clue that you are being deceived: the internet guru will do what governments and newsmen do and try to get you to worry about what may or may not be happening across the world in places you can't easily travel to, if you can go at all. We are encouraged to join the big "We the People" and march off on all sorts of Pied Piper led pilgrimages to save the world from itself. This is an endless emotional appeal that traditionally leads nowhere. 


Real investigations would not be subject to all the News media spotlight.

Have you heard the one about the Saudi terrorists and the Vegas shooting and how it was real despite all the crisis acting and obvious signs of staging and the usual modus operandi and crisis casting? The Vegas event has all the same tell tale signs of layer of deception designed to hide the truth that the whole event was a hoax.

Turn the News off. There is no reason to believe any of the major stories - the long history of lies and fakery is clear. Only fools would buy into any of it. I think all the major News has to be fake. We learn too many details. The News media is not the proper forum for investigations. We have to get over this media conditioned idea that the major mainstream News media is some kind of real investigative body, it is not.

We would not really be privy to all the very public details the government and media make sure we all end up learning about. We have been conditioned to think the News media noise machine normal. The press should not logically report real investigations, it makes no sense. The News reporting itself would effect the investigation and this should be obvious to any one with a working brain. Video footage and News accounts are not evidence, they are claims, that usually are obviously logically fallacious. There is no reason to believe the Vegas shooting was anything but a completely fake event. Real investigations would not be subject to all the News media spotlight.


CASE STUDY: SHOOTING THE VEGAS SHOOTING DRILL

The Vegas shooting was an obvious bit of propaganda theater like all the rest of the major News stories out there. It appears that all major dramatic News is fake. There really is nothing more to be said about it. The Military itself is a lot weaker than most people realize and the real battlefield they focus on is in the realm of ideas and they seem to spend a lot of time crafting fake news stories for public consumption.

Like the rest of the absurdist fiction sold as fact, the recent Vegas shooting was another cartoon fiasco that quickly revealed itself for what it was. I don't even know what to say as no rationale mind that has any clue about media fakery should take that event seriously. I can understand if one is unfamiliar with media fakery, but what's the excuse when one is familiar with governmental and News hoaxing? The Vegas shooting screams scripted nonsense that seems to be meant for an audience of brain dead people. This seems to be what  most of the media consuming public is. For all the great achievements of civilization, individuals tend to be very dumb and do not want to actually exert the energy needed to really get their brains working.

Broken News

Vegas.gif

It is completely illogical and irrational to think you can prove anything (but fakery) with News accounts.

People can quote all the textbook history and News sourced journalism they want. They can also sing "Yankee Doodle Dandy" and recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" while standing on one leg, with they fingers crossed behind their backs. They can act like overgrown children and attempt to salvage their belief in unionized arctic elves, with mind twisting, pretzel logic. Humans lie to themselves and we also lie to each other. We deceive and we conceal. Human beings lie. Nature does not.

I do happen to think that there are obviously deceptive personas online. What I specifically mean is not that these people, just fellow human beings, are paid shills or anything like that, I have no evidence of that, what I do see evidence for is clear lack of reasoning and critical thought and in its place a parrot like willingness to echo back 'prerecorded material', like every good conditioned human resource educated, peer reviewed, and indoctrinated mind should. I think that should be clear to those of you who are (hopefully) my fellow hoax busting fakeologist, clues seeking, brothers and sisters. After spending a lifetime metaphorically swimming in the ubiquitous multimedia machine and after spending the last few years using this impressive tool to research it, to verify other people's research and claims and to eliminate others, I have come to the conclusion that the real weaponry of 20th century military might is the electronic media. This is no great revelation and is very obvious. 9/11, the JFK fake assassination, MLK, RFK, and all the rest, all follow the same pattern of cartoon reasoned reality. I know the public thinks of these events as history and this lends them the credibility they do not deserve. This creates the perception of an undeserved and unwarranted reality.

Targeting the Human Mind Online: You Are Your Own Gatekeeper

The Vegas shooting seemed like it had a social media aspect that was designed to get those of us who realize that pretty much all major national and international News stories are fake, and that a lot of the news is distorted and otherwise filtered to meet commercial based agendas at the very least, to think that one was real. It almost seems as if part of the psychological warfare plan was to target various online podcasters, some of whom came across like they were so sure the event was real, it seemed they'd be willing to even bet their lives on it,  (Vega gambling/shooting pun intended)  I don't blame anyone for being taken in by very public wakes and funerals nor do I expect anyone to believe that such things could be staged, not without some context and thought, that is. Obviously we have to come to the seemingly odd conclusion that the government colludes with aspects of the News media, and other interests to craft live action role playing theater events. In my opinion this idea is far fetched when viewed from the point of view of most people. But my opinion is also that most people are viewing things incorrectly. Metaphorically I'd say that most people view so-called historical events through the wrong end of the telescope. They have their tool turned around so the world looks upside down and is out of proportion, The real problem is that we have all been long conditioned by educational system, governmental influence, radio, television, film and now the internet, to accept a circular reasoned based logic as a valid exercise of individual intelligence. The fact that all the peer reviewed reinforcement is clearly a form of obvious crowd psychology is a fact that a lot of us herded humanity seem to ignore. In fact when we point out some of the absurdities that are obvious for all to see, most people resort to all sorts of ad hoc apologetics to protect their belief in unionized arctic elves. People act as their own deceptive gatekeeping governmental agents.

The way the News media works and how they do not really present actual, real events as claimed, is easily researched with the very tool you are using to read these words. The governmental control of media even in the United States is also easily researched and demonstrated. The fact that the major News anchors are governmental propaganda agents is also easily demonstrated with this very tool. The fact that there are many online hacks who talk the talk and have their acts polished, waiting to lure unsuspecting minds into an endless conspiracy dead end is also easily revealed to those who look.

The overwhelming evidence is that the Vegas event was a scripted role playing drill like the rest. Only government would want to try to apply damage control apologetics to what should be obvious to all with working minds. In fact the way the media conducts itself gives away the fake nature of it all and this makes those who claim otherwise seem to me to be either simply unwise, uneducated or perhaps full of it. We can disagree over many things but what does not make sense to me is to ignore even the possibility of the obvious. Some people go further than that and are willing to apply the most cartoon like and ridiculous James Cameron like explanations they can find to avoid just saying that Vegas was completely fake, I guess some feel the need to attempt to salvage some kind of conspiracy maze out of this one. All sorts of byzantine like explanations can be ad hoc offered to patch what is obviously cracks in the facade of a fraudulent event.

Many online podcasting style personas seem awfully intent on selling obvious International political theater as real. Keep in mind these are not just people who claim to be the regular audience members and average consumers of News product. I am referring to people who claim to be serious researchers and who have shown that they are capable of solid research and logical thinking. This is why it is surprising when we come across statements that these minds make that have no relation to reality that we can observe, verify or demonstrate. It seems that there are a lot of us who claim to think logically and yet never seem to actually get around to it. These folk tend to give themselves away as their work never leads anywhere new and quickly becomes stale to those who have active intellects and are not seeking some thought leader to do their thinking for them.

We can is disagree about details, but what should be apparent to anyone who seriously researched the News media and media in general, is that it was always a military weapon and that the public mind was always the target audience. Wars are not what we think and history is not anywhere as real as advertised, being comprised of material derived from unreliable sources like Newsreels, for example. Many online 'researchers" ignore very easily demonstrated history. The origins of RCA is no secret, nor is the banana republic like interest the U.S. Navy and United Fruit Company took in it. None of this is secret. This is one example of many.

I know that there is more of an audience for conspiracy fare and I do not blame anyone for orienting their work in that direction in order to put food on the table and to keep a decent roof over head. I do not have any problems with anyone making money from their effort. The thing is I've personally got to the point where I can't even listen to what seems to not ring true. Illogical and baseless statements that people make stand out for what they are. This does not always mean that the opinions expressed by such statements false, although it often does. It might (occasionally) simply means that more information is needed.

About Online Shills: Some Speculation

I think if there are online agents, they are few in number and would be multitasking agents. One person would fill many roles. I doubt very much if anyone cares to budget for any serious online operation that comes anywhere near how mainstream and real alternative media is run. I think many online podcasters might have economic reason to  limit their subject matter to more conspiratorial and less reverse cultural imagineering areas because of the simple reason that there is more of an audience for that material. I do not blame anyone for wanting to increase their audience in order to reach more minds with their ideas, even if I do think some of those ideas, at least somewhat deceptive. I do not believe in some kind of thought police enforced community litmus test. I do not believe in really self identifying as anything but a human being,so I am not into the whole 'community' thing, anyway.

Of course the media admits that online marketers make use of guerrilla style advertising tactics which would include deceptive and public perceptive manipulating, comment postings.


The International Space Fakery Gatekeeping Mousetrap Maze

Outer space is fake. It can only exist on screens, in photographs and as gossip.

The space programs were created for the medium of television. These highly edited artifacts reveal the illusion for what it is.

Keep in mind huge rockets are supposed to be the medium for world wide nuclear annihilation.

Newton Wrong.gif

Artificial orbits are fake.

Man made orbits and rocket trips into outer space are simply physically impossible. Satellites can't be anything but scheduled gas filled balloon flights, or run of the mill military passenger or cargo jet, if anything man made at all; moving lights in the sky could very well be just natural phenomena. These lights need not be artificial in origin or if they are, perhaps we might speculate that such a display could be some kind of radio based technology that produces a moving star like effect.

The works of Newton and Einstein are demonstrably wrong. We can disprove Einstein's brain teasing General Relativity thought experiments with a compass, for example. We can easily prove the work of International Space agencies fake with actual physical science we can demonstrate. There are many problems with mainstream cosmology and the so-called science sold as "settled" is not so. The falling apple proves Newton wrong not right. The rising and setting Moon is not like the falling apple. The accelerated phenomena of gravity towards what would be Earth's round center, in Newtonian model, would mean Newton's imagined cannonball would fall. Newton conveniently manages to forget that gravity's apparent push or pull is not set at fixed velocity but continues to increase with time, while the projectile inertia is described as a fixed velocity. His fallacious orbital mechanics relies on gravity in order to work. Yet he relies on an imagined version that works like he needs it to and does not work at all like we can demonstrate with actual ballistic physics. Ballistic physics shows us that the bullet dropped from gun pistol height, hits the ground at the same time as if fired from the gun. The vertical and horizontal motions are independent of each other. Centrifugal force cannot be used as explanation as the imagined orbiting space station would fly off in what would be a straight line, like a stone from David's proverbial sling. That is what real demonstrable Natural principle reveals to us. Newton's work, like Einstein's, is nothing but demonstrable fiction, backed only with nonsensically applied mathematical equation that acts like mind numbing, hypnotic, spell.

Astrophyscis is not a science and this is proven by simply showing all the internal inconsistencies and contradictions that can be easily found in its ad hoc collection of patchwork "theories'. None of this has anything to do with curvature or the shape of the Earth which is not really that important, however interesting this subject seems. And I do too find it interesting. As for what the stars may or may not be, in the case of the Sun, Moon, planets and celestial phenomena, these are primary light sources, something most people seem to not consider. When we make light we can either use fire or electricity. Learn how light bulbs work and why vacuum tubes used to be used for mass communications and you will learn a lot about how the stars and other celestial phenomena might work. Whatever the deal is or isn't, it's more of a metaphysical question than we are supposed to consider. There are obvious problems with the Newtonian heliocentric model that led to all the ad hoc patchwork in the first place. The current patchwork mess is a far cry form the Sun centered Universe of Newton and company. Things like the supposed Foucault pendulums and the like, contradict the concept of Newtonian inertia; and do not work as advertised and would not be logically expected to. The pendulum would be dragged along with the spinning globe. We can demonstrate inertia and momentum and since this model posits a spinning Earth, we can see how none of this makes any logical sense. See article index, or look to the bottom website navigation bar, for more. Suffice it to say that things like the Foucault pendulum are not anywhere near the "evidence" the university indoctrinated mind claims The aptly named "Fixed Stars" are also very problematic as there is never any real parallax, despite nonsensical hype to the contrary. Just look up the supposed relative distances between stars in the same constellations that never change shape (over the course of the Earth's imagined yearly journey from one side of solar system to the other)  as we would expect in a real three dimensional universe. If the stars were the (different) distances as claimed we'd expect there to be no constellations as the imagined shapes in the sky would continue to morph over the course of the year. There would be no Big Dipper, no little dipper or any other named celestial shape.

Despite all noise to the contrary, there is no experiment that shows the Earth spins or orbits. All logical and rationale observation always shows us the world moves not.

The Michelson Gale Pearson Experiment that supposedly shows the Earth spins with optical apparatus is fudged. The mathematical formula reveals the sleight of mind trickery for what it is. This formula is clearly designed to create desired result. See this site's article index or website navigation bar for more. This is one of many examples.

There are many logical fallacies floated as observable reality that are simply not so. Many so-called scientific theories leave out obvious explanations in favor of a narrow interpretation of information. This is not science. One example is the mainstream explanation of angular momentum which makes liberal use of an ice skater but ignores the very real atmosphere that would cause obvious drag on outstretched limbs, which logically explains why the skater's rotational motion increases when she pulls her arms in towards her body. Now she does not have two arms outstretched to slow her down by means of very real air resistance. Move your hand and you should feel the very real atmosphere around you. Angular momentum is presented in distorted propaganda fashion in order to support heliocentric based silliness. A car making a turn based on a large radius at say 66 mph, requires more energy to make the same 66 mph turn based on a smaller radius. In this manner energy is conserved in logical fashion. Torque and spinning merry go round platforms demonstrate some of the problems with mainstream cosmology and some of what is sold as "physics". The mainstream explanation for angular momentum seems to incorrectly associate area with rotational motion in a fallacious manner, leaving out observable atmospheric reality in the process.

By the way, you can think the world best modeled flat. I do not agree and I think too many flat earthers ignore the simple fact that we are too small relative to curvature of the Earth to be able to notice it based on landscape and the like. This does not mean the world is or is not a globe, in and of itself. It means that the globe model makes sense in this context and to pretend otherwise is deceptive. Despite what Flat Earth YouTube gurus claim, the globe model is Not so easily disproved. The shape of the world seems to be used as socially divisive tool with the flat earth podcasters and YouTube channels, being those who push this the hardest. At the same time many of these folk push the idea they are going to save the world by taking down NASA while ignoring the fact that by putting Flat Earth first, most people will tune out whatever other things the self proclaimed "Flat Earthers" have to say. There's a reason why people like Neil deGrasse Tyson attack Flat Earth and not Ptolemy. It's unwise to rely on other people to tell you what to think. Learn to do your own research, if you haven't already. The geocentric, celestial spherical based model of Ptolemy is not the complicated mess of mainstream university imposed mythological doctrine. It should be obvious to everyone that the current patchwork model of conflicting ideas is the more complicated and complex model of "reality"; which is in fact a model of unreality. It should be obvious that the multiverse of black hole nonsense is nothing but a patchwork of cartoon imaginings backed by peer reviewed mathematical gibberish. Current cosmology models nothing real at all.


Proving Newton Wrong

The International Space Station is supposed to orbit the Earth at some 17,170 MPH which works out to some 286 miles per minute or so at a height of some 249 miles from the surface of the Earth in what NASA describes as near vacuum environment, so there is very little atmospheric drag to speak of; this same lack of drag would mean that the ISS would plummet towards the Earth without being measurably slowed by any atmosphere for at least part of its journey. The ISS is supposed to be subject to some 90% of Earth's gravitational pull. In the time it takes the space station to travel 1000 miles, 3.5 minutes, the space station would fall some 121 or so miles towards the center of the Earth. The falling apple reveals Sir Isaac's orbital theory, backed with illogical thought experiment and bad mathematical equation, for the fantasy it is.

I point this out in this manner for effect, to illustrate how flawed this idea really is. The falling object would quickly encounter atmosphere and presumably burn up. We can demonstrate the phenomena known as friction. We cannot demonstrate artificial orbits, which can only exist as illusions on screens or in photographs.

source: Free fall (distance and velocity) Calculator - High accuracy calculation

"Near the surface of the Earth, an object in free fall in a vacuum will accelerate at approximately 9.8 m/s2, independent of its mass. With air resistance acting on an object that has been dropped, the object will eventually reach a terminal velocity, which is around 53 m/s (195 km/h or 122 mph) for a human skydiver."

source: Free fall - Wikipedia


Of UFO's:

Radio control is an old technology, it dates back to the late 1800's or so. More than likely UFO's are just radio controlled, gas filled dirigibles.

I have never seen anything that would lead me to believe that some kind of Nikola Tesla electrical flying machine is real. I guess such a thing is possible, (especially if what we call gravity is actually some kind of electrical effect) but I consider this to be another likely governmental super power propaganda canard designed, perhaps, to save the space program.

This could be an onion skin layer of lies that protects the hoaxing truth. For example, the Apollo Lunar Module of Moon landing fakery fame, might need this kind of face saving science fiction (lie) technology as explanation for what we've seen on screens, and so might artificial satellites. Perhaps this was the thinking behind the obvious governmental pushing of the UFO meme. Whether the technology is from an alien source or from a man made source, the idea is that there is some kind of X-Files like saucer technology, which is nothing more than Hollywood myth, as far as we can tell. I think more than likely, all tales, photograph, film and video footage of UFOs are hoaxes of one kind or another. The UFO theme makes for great gossip. If you ever saw or see a light in the sky that you cannot identify make rapid impossible turns and otherwise perform feats that would not seem to be real, you might want to consider that the light you witnessed might be better described as some kind of electrical occurrence, natural or artificial, rather than as a physical body.

see: Radio control - Wikipedia


Paranoia Is A Two Way Street

I do think there's something to the idea that someone might not be too happy with those of us who explain how the fakery is done. I do think there is damage control and all sorts of noise and games designed to distract and mislead people away from noticing all the seams and imperfections in what are supposed to be real stories. If you ever watched the television show Columbo, you have seen how the guilty will come up with all sorts of ad hoc explanations, some better than others, to justify their claimed 'innocence'. The same reasoning applies when we look at News media stories. We have clear evidence of complete fakery and yet apologists emerge out of the woodwork to claim otherwise. They will even go to absurd and cartoonish extremes. imagining all sorts of espionage they cannot prove. What can they point to? Only more media noise we can't verify.


Recommended Reading: "The Creators" By Daniel Boorstin

This screen is more powerful than any book ever was. At your fingertips is the best library tools ever to be held in human hand. At your disposal right now are all the works referred to in "The Creators". Consider how powerful that makes you. At your disposal is the greatest (public) library humanity has to offer. Should't it be respected and used for more than empty gossip? Keep in mind this editorial is but my opinion and meant as food for thought. You are free to think and speak as you desire and of course, need no permission from me or anyone else. If you disagree with me, keep on talking about all the things I think are bread and circus distractions. Your thoughts and interests are for you to explore anyway you like. You can proclaim your ideas as loud and as often as you want. That is what freedom is supposed to be. News media and government are into programming people. I am into the opposite. Those institutes pay only advertising lip service to the concept that the word "freedom" represents. I do not.

Creators+.jpg

A History of Heroes of the Imagination

"The Creators is a non-fiction work of cultural history by Daniel Boorstin published in 1992 and is the second volume in what has become known as the Knowledge Trilogy. It was preceded by The Discoverers and succeeded by The Seekers."

"The Creators, subtitled A History of Heroes of the Imagination, is the story of mankind's creativity. It highlights great works of art, music and literature but it is more than a recitation or list. It is a book of ideas and the people behind those ideas. It encompasses architecture, music, literature, painting, sculpture, the performing arts, theater, religious expression and philosophy. It can be viewed as a companion to The Discoverers which chronicled the history of invention, exploration and technology. The Creators traces the creative process from pre-history Egypt to modern times and like The Discoverers, follows both a topical and chronological structure. Boorstin writes in "A Personal Note to the Reader", "After The Discoverers... "I was more than ever convinced that the pursuit of knowledge is only one path to human fulfillment. This companion book, also a view from the literate West, is a saga of Heroes of the Imagination. While The Discoverers told of the conquest of illusions - the illusion of knowledge - this will be a story of vision (and illusions) newly created..." If The Discoverers is the story of the inventive human mind then The Creators is the story of the searching soul. The work is in twelve major parts that have been grouped into four books."

"Literature and its development comprises a major portion of the book. This reflects the high regard in which Boorstin held the written word. He has stated that the book is the greatest technological invention of all time. He suggests that literary evolution both changed and reflected new ways of thinking about the self. Indeed, literature was the driving force behind changes in personal perspectives starting (once again) with Greece. In another reference to incrementalism he traces the path from writing to religious poetry, the two being intertwined. Boorstin suggests that poetry in both form and substance was written to remember. Prose, a new form of literature, emerged and with it the theater. The play was transformed from a religious exercise to a creative one that saw the appearance of comedy, drama and tragedy. Because prose was not in a form that made for easy memorization, a greater imagination was required by the author. The theater served those purposes admirably and Greeks both loved and excelled at the performing arts. The spectators who viewed these works began asking the same questions and changing their perspective. The introduction of prose also led to education and the areas of study became the foundation of a Classical education to this day - rhetoric, logic, grammar, astronomy, mathematics and philosophy. The latter existed because of the skeptical nature of some Greek thinkers who dared to ask why; it could only exist because of prose. Boorstin proposes that prose also encouraged the development of democracy by inviting participation from the citizenry. Other literary forms rose. The epic and its tales of gods and heroes and their great deeds continued, although somewhat abated. History as story began with Herodotus (fifth century BC) and The Histories. But it was the novel, what Boorstin calls "re-creating life out of life", that democratized literature. The novel inspired new ways of thinking about ourselves and our world and the forms created were revelations to the Western mind - the essay, the biography, stories of our own feelings and views, adventure tales and streams of consciousness in which time itself is manipulated. The author had finally discovered the self as a resource of art, the internal rather than the external universe serving as the source of inspiration."

source: The Creators - Wikipedia

novel | Origin and meaning of novel by Online Etymology Dictionary


Do you believe News headlines simply because they exist?

The News media can only present claims. We might be able to find evidence of fakery by examining these claims, which seems easy enough to do; what we cannot do is use these media claims to prove anything other than fakery. Allegations promoted by the News media are not proof. Media hyped and News journalist conducted victim interviews are not evidence of anything but a propaganda campaign. The very public News media is not the arena for real criminal style investigative work. We do not need to know all the details we end up knowing and in the context of a real and logically conducted investigation it makes no sense for there to be all the media attention in the first place. The News media exists to act as ubiquitous social shepherd. Mass media News stories are scripted to act as emotionally charged human behavioral modification moments. These stories are meant to shape our collective lives and minds and limit our imaginations in the process. Modern electronic based media is the new (world wide webbed, 'village') church; it presents only proverbial false prophets to the mass human audience. This creates an illusory world many of us mistake for reality. Too many of us really are best described as mindless sheep who are herded by delusional Little Bo Peep, cargo cult leaders. All of humanity is supposed to be part of this faithful (somewhat insane) flock.

News From Nowhere Leads Nowhere

If you pay attention you notice a lot of this stuff sold goes nowhere at all. The world is always about to end, oil is always about to run out, the climate is always about to change and we are always on the precipice about to step off into our imagined destiny colonizing the stars. The online conspiracy crowd is no different.



FIN

 

MAINSTREAM NEWS MEDIA CONTENT WARNING

For adult eyes only, the following section contains mature, mainstream News media content.

Postscript: DARPA & "Enhancing Sexual Harassment Training"

(see comments below for more)

"Disney's President H.W. Bush Animatronic Robot Accused of Groping Park Visitors and Employees"

Gossip: A Powerful Governmental Propaganda Tool

"Before implementing and introducing an innovation that will cause significant change to your organisation, you could mention to a key person or two that you are deeply concerned about how employees will accept the innovation and the change it will bring. You only hope that employees will recognise the value of the innovation to the survival and growth of the company and so accept the necessary change. You believe they will. You have a great team. You can be sure this gossip will spread around the company in no time. But, because it is gossip and not a formal announcement, people are more likely to accept the gossip as being more authentic than an official announcement. As a result, it is also more likely that people will buy into the value of the innovation and so be accepting of the necessary change. Alternatively, if people start moaning, management you have information you can use to change the way you introduce the innovation. You may even need to rethink how you implement the innovation."

quote source: Gossip Can Help Your Company Innovate Better - Jeffrey Baumgartner

dea63a4a-5c34-11e7-9c4a-517850699006_600x400 (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: Disney World Hall of Presidents Attraction to Feature a Speaking Trump - TheStreet

We might not be able to verify claims of DARPA robotic achievements for ourselves and we might never get to play with any of their unverifiable claimed robotic feats as the only evidence we can "interact with" is on screen by means of passive viewing. We cannot interact with any real and tangible working model of a DARPA robot dog, for example. Keep in mind I am not claiming that robotics is not real or anything like that. It's just that I have watched one specific DARPA robot video on Youtube that I have found to be quite questionable. It's the one with the big cow like robot that gets kicked, falls down and gets back up again, if I remember it correctly. It's not like I think all DARPA robotics technology fake, either, by the way; but I do think we might want to to keep in mind that DARPA is also into CGI technology. What we can examine is the very real computer graphics and related Hollywood technology and entertainment techniques and tactics. Of course we could go to a Disney theme park and interact with the only robotics the public have ever really been exposed to. I doubt R2D2 is gong to be mass produced anytime soon.

List of Disney attractions using Audio-Animatronics - Wikipedia   •   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio-Animatronics  •  The Hall of Presidents - Wikipedia

This article (quoted below) focuses on the military's interest in computer graphics and video game simulation which itself is revealing in the context of the manufacture of fake scientific feats, News and history. Hollywood celebrity have always represented governmental interest as the World War One era Liberty Bond sales show. World War Two was very much a Hollywood sequel to the first one. Hollywood just loves war, salacious headlines, P.T. Barnum style celebrity show trials and selling s-e-x and death. Hollywood has always been well aware of its power to create new cultural forms and has always worked with government to do so.

Hollywood has always been involved in crafting layers of an augmented version of reality by means of a controlled paparazzi tabloid press that long ago sold the public a mentally unhealthy addiction to celebrity gossip. The public personas of celebrities are just as much scripted and contrived products as everything else Hollywood produces.

Harassment.jpg

source: Zones of Control: Perspectives on Wargaming

Goal of the Committee:

"To explore how the Entertainment Industry (EI) and the Department of Defense (DoD) and its associated industries can develop a stronger technology base for modeling & simulation and profit from a closer working relationship."

source: Modeling & Simulation: Linking Entertainment & Defense


"Everyone's Doing it!"

(All men at least)

Don't you want to take this new "ice bucket challenge" too?

I'm sure you can go out and find someone to harass just like your favorite celebrities do. I am being sarcastic, of course. I threw in a couple of oldies but goodies for context.

Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations - Wikipedia   •   2017 Westminster sexual scandals - Wikipedia   •   Weinstein effect - Wikipedia   •   List of federal political sex scandals in the United States - Wikipedia   •   Lewinsky scandal - Wikipedia   •   Al Franken - Wikipedia   •   Anita Hill - Wikipedia   •   Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination - Wikipedia   •   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ailes    •    First on CNN: New George H.W. Bush accuser says he groped her ...

Kevin Spacey scandal: A complete list of the 15 accusers - USA Today   •   Louis C.K. Is Accused by 5 Women of Sexual Misconduct - The New ...

DC Comics suspended a top editor after sexual harassment allegations  •   'Supergirl,' 'Arrow' Producer Suspended Amid Sexual Harassment ...

Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Sex Scandal - The New York Times   •   Al Franken Sexual Harassment Scandal: Female 'SNL' Staff Defends ...

Fox News Settled Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Bill O'Reilly ...

Ain't It Cool News' Harry Knowles accused of sexual assault - Salon.com

George Takei denies sexually assaulting model in 1981

Hollywood agent Adam Venit suspended after Terry Crews' public ...

Charlie Rose fired by CBS, and PBS drops his talk show over sexual ...

Calls Grow For Key California Lawmaker To Step Down Amid Harassment Claims

Rep. John Conyers Reportedly Settled Complaint Involving Unwanted Advances

Buzz Lightyear alleges Rex the Toy Story dinosaur assaulted him while they were on a press junket...

"John Lasseter's Pattern of Alleged Misconduct Detailed by Disney/Pixar Insiders"

source: John Lasseter's Pattern of Alleged Misconduct Detailed by Disney ...


How could all these “Me Too” News stories be ready to go so fast if this weasn’t anything but a coordinated propaganda campaign?

The mainstream media is not the proper forum for these allegations, despite our social conditioning to really believe otherwise.

Click the link to see the 30 men accused in rapid succession. This is like mental machine gun fire.

Does this all too public "investigation" of sorts really make sense as anything but a Military Industrial style, public relations campaign?

"After multiple women came forward to accuse Harvey Weinstein, the Hollywood producer, of sexual misconduct, at least 30 high-profile men in a variety of industries have also been accused. Since then, a number have resigned, been fired or experienced other fallout after claims ranging from inappropriate text messages to rape."

source: After Weinstein: A List of Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct and the ...


fc2a22e2c0730e7178572e3f0d627500.gif

image source: Metropolis (1927 film) - Wikipedia

FLASHBACK: November 2016, All Women Lose The Presidency!

If you recall, or just google it, this October brought us Weinstein's scandal, last year we had Trump's scandalous remarks and the year prior we had the Bill Cosby's fiasco.

The mainstream News media pushes hyper sexualized headlines to a general audience. That and they love playing the old 1960's Woman's Liberation card, among other 'oldies but goodies'.

"The Women's March was a worldwide protest on January 21, 2017, to advocate legislation and policies regarding human rights and other issues, including women's rights, immigration reform, healthcare reform, reproductive rights, the natural environment, LGBTQ rights, racial equality, freedom of religion and workers' rights. Most of the rallies were aimed at Donald Trump, immediately following his inauguration as President of the United States, largely due to statements that he had made and positions that he had taken which were regarded by many as anti-women or otherwise offensive. It was the largest single-day protest in U.S. history."

"The first planned protest was in Washington, D.C., and is known as the Women's March on Washington. According to organizers it was meant to "send a bold message to our new administration on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights". The Washington March was streamed live on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. The Washington March drew 440,000 to 500,000 people, and worldwide participation has been estimated at five million. At least 408 marches were reported to have been planned in the U.S. and 168 in 81 other countries. After the marches, officials who organized them reported that 673 marches took place worldwide, on all seven continents, including 29 in Canada, 20 in Mexico, and one in Antarctica. In Washington D.C. alone, the protests were the largest political demonstrations since the anti–Vietnam War protests in the 1960s and 1970s. The Women's March crowds were peaceful, and no arrests were made in Washington, D.C., Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, and Seattle, where an estimated combined total of two million people marched. Following the march, the organizers of the Women's March on Washington posted the "10 Actions for the first 100 Days" campaign for joint activism to keep up the momentum from the march."

source: 2017 Women's March - Wikipedia   •   Bill Cosby sexual assault allegations - Wikipedia  •  Donald Trump and Billy Bush recording - Wikipedia


Consider the obvious mainstream media harassment scandal - public relations campaign.

Consider all the various kinds of social shepherd celebrities that have been involved. All various forms of actors, including the politicians. This is what a psychological operation looks like.

All the "trusted Newsmen" and Hollywood, comic book editors, television show producers and even political stars involved in this all too public scandal would seem to be part of a scripted DARPA style show. These people would seem to be what real "secret agents" look like.

That is what the evidence we can actually examine and verify points to.



I highly recommend the latest from these two sources:

http://hoaxbusterscall.blogspot.com   •   http://fakeologist.com

Some great, thought provoking conversations  to listen to.