A Proper Gander At Propaganda

Truth Transcends Community

"Propaganda in the United States is spread by both government and media entities. Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to influence opinions. It's used in advertising, radio, newspaper, posters, books, television, and other media."  -  Propaganda in the United States - Wikipedia

"A man without a government is like a fish without a bicycle.” Alvaro Koplovich

Article index

Government is Crime: The Misadventures of George Washington A Wig Wearing Founding Phony.

Please excuse any typos you may find. Spell check is evil, We will correct them as we find them. Thank you, AAMorris Staff

The First Foppish Minion-in-Chief

Do you think this man wore make up in real life? The numerous oil paintings seems to indicate the man liked to play dress up.

Don't Be Fooled: This Man is Nothing But a Masonic Minion of The Royal Crown

George Washington is a Myth. The man himself was an Elitist Minion of the Royal Mafia Global Banking Ring.

Washington's biography reads like a Sunday morning comic strip, which is after all, all it is. Yellow journalism is the basic blueprint for all the nonsense sold to us as history and news and religion and all the rest of the obviously controlled canard.

This man magically was able to become a soldier, with no prior training. He also had the odd habit of playing dress up as soldier even though there was no war. Here we have a clear example of the childish mentality that supposedly founded the nation of the United States. We now know that "Nations" are nonsense and promoted in order to maintain the social order and criminal racket we call government.

The founding of the United States marks the rise of the middle manager class which run the corporate world and whose positions we take for granted today. These middle men do nothing "but move paper from the in box to the out box".

Uploaded by sharon watts on 2016-09-12.

Please listen to this clip, just the part of the lecture where Alan Watts discusses the lie and myth of history.

Just an Overgrown Adolescent Playing Make Believe Commander Guy - a Fake Soldier

"This uniform was worn by George Washington from 1789 until his death in 1799; the small clothes or breeches and waistcoat, date from the revolutionary period. 

In paintings of Washington during this period, he often posed for life portraits and was often depicted wearing this uniform. An example of this would be the watercolor portrait on irovy painted by artist John Ramage in 1789; it is the first known depiction of this uniform in a portrait of Washington. 

In December 1798, Washington was recorded wearing this uniform when he visited Philadelphia on Provisional Army duty. He wore a similar uniform when he was commissioned by the Continental Congress as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army.

None of his uniforms from the Revolutionary War period are known to have survived."

http://amhistory.si.edu/militaryhistory/collection/object.asp?ID=763

The legendary uniforms of George Washington are nothing but hearsay and oil painting myth. It really is amazing how so much of our society, and laws are based on little more than repeated hearsay nonsense. We are conditioned to accept this reasoning as valid, when it clearly is not.

Washington's biography and family pedigree indicates a man who was more 'blue blood' than not. This would seem to be someone who was born of the leisure class, who also is part of this feudal wage slave system, but who has golden chains and a  gilded cage.

HIs supposed diary of the French and Indian war reeks of obvious yellow journal lies.

We tend to forget that these men were slave owners. The Founding Fathers were slave owners. Our fellow human beings and brothers and sisters from Africa were taken by force and in chains against their will. This act of evil and horror, the vile business of slavery was part of the Feudal System and the result of the deeds of the nobility and not the common man. In other words, the white European farmer and other low class manual labor types and so on, did not own huge plantains with slaves, did they? Does that sound right? The way the history is sold to us is tends to ignore the very real fact that the slave trade was a huge business enterprise that was officially sanctioned by the ruling elite themselves. The slave owners are of the higher classes and not of the mass public. These are the same people who set up and maintained the Social System we still live under today. What we do not usually understand is that we are all wage slaves. The country itself is the plantation and the banking, credit card, currency, tax and Social Security system are the paper chains that bind us to a paper Crown that does nothing but spit digits onto screens. The peasant was just one small step above the slave. We really need to understand that our modern so-called middle class is an illusion like all other such distinctions and that mental slavery and not physical slavery is the order of the day. Physical slavery is saved for prisoners. The entire system is based on commerce. The lie of government is that they exist to help us. The governments exist to serve the commercial enterprise system of the Royals. Make no mistake, this entire world is theirs, or so they think. 

In America, the so-called land of the free, the King of England gave up the rights to the land. We take out huge and needless mortgages to spend some thirty years paying it off, to the retire and have to pay taxes on the property anyway. How is this freedom? We were better off before the American Revolution. There was more freedom then.

We are supposed to think that our property taxes go to paying for our communities. They do not. The money goes back into the system. This is all part of the criminal racket.

Masonic Brothers and Controlled Opposition Leaders in the Days Before Mass Communication

Controlled Opposition and other such operations used to be conducted by the precursors to modern day Governmental and Military Intelligence agencies. The early intelligence organizational structure that existed, pre-modern communications and pre-modern transportation meant more secrecy and coded messages and secret hand shakes, symbols, signs and so on.

Controlled Opposition exists to shepherd the people right back into the system or to guide us into more restrictive mental and socially reinforced prisons. We cannot be allowed to sound the bell of reason and true freedom which is Naturally granted and a birthright. Instead we get watered down freedom by way of Artificially Scripted so-called "Liberty" which is symbolized appropriately by a cracked Bell.

The modern mythology about Masonry is somewhat deceptive as the higher and important hierarchy has long transcended the older structures in favor of the Military Industrial Entertainment Complex™ model. This is the current incarnation of 666 multimedia beast we all know and love. 

Article discussed: http://www.unityofthepolis.com/the-ideal-arrangement-of-rhodes-and-the-organic-unity-of-empire-by-kevin-cole/ next article: ...

This video explains the purpose of the mythic Masons - please watch

"In December 1798, Washington was recorded wearing this uniform when he visited Philadelphia on Provisional Army duty. He wore a similar uniform when he was commissioned by the Continental Congress as commander in chief of the Continental army.

None of his uniforms from the Revolutionary War period are known to have survived"

George Washington's Uniform | National Museum of American History

A Continental Lie

"The Continental Congress commissioned George Washington as Commander in Chief of the Continental Army on June 19, 1775. Washington was selected over other candidates such as John Hancock based on his previous military experience and the hope that a leader from Virginia could help unite the colonies. Washington left for Massachusetts within days of receiving his commission and assumed command of the Continental Army in Cambridge on July 3, 1775. After eight years of war, Washington resigned his commission as Commander in Chief on December 23, 1783."

George Washington's Commission as ... - Library of Congress

The death of his father prevented Washington from an education at England’s Appleby School, such as his older brothers had received. He achieved the equivalent of an elementary school education from a variety of tutors, as well as from a school run by an Anglican clergyman in or near Fredericksburg.[19][20] Talk of securing an appointment in the Royal Navy for him when he was 15 was dropped when his widowed mother objected.

Washington was appointed by Governor Dinwiddie as one of the four district adjutants in February 1753, with the rank of major in the Virginia militia.[During this period, Washington became a Freemason while in Fredericksburg, although his involvement was minimal.
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington
Truer Words Were never Spoken

It's All About 'Land Land Land!"

"In 1749, at the age of 17, Washington began his career as a professional surveyor. He subsequently received a commission and surveyor's license from the College of William and Mary[d] and became the official surveyor for the newly formed Culpeper County. Thanks to his older brother Lawrence's connection to the prominent Fairfax family, Washington had been appointed to this well-paid official position. In less than two days he completed his first survey, plotting a 400-acre parcel of land, and was well on his way to a promising career. He was subsequently able to purchase land in the Shenandoah Valley, the first of his many land acquisitions in western Virginia. For the next four years Washington worked surveying land in Western Virginia and for the Ohio Company, a land investment company funded by Virginia investors. Thanks to Lawrence's position as commander of the Virginia militia, Washington came to the notice of the new lieutenant governor of Virginia, Robert Dinwiddie. He was hard to miss: At over six feet,[e] he was taller than most of his contemporaries.  In October 1750, Washington resigned his position as an official surveyor, though he continued to work diligently over the next three years at his new profession. He continued to survey professionally for two more years, mostly in Frederick County before receiving a military appointment as adjutant for southern Virginia. By 1752, Washington completed close to 200 surveys on numerous properties totaling more than 60,000 acres. He would continue to survey at different times throughout his life and as late as 1799."

Faking the French & Indian War?

"Washington began his military service in the French and Indian War[f] as a major in the militia of the British Province of Virginia. In 1753 he was sent as an ambassador from the British crown to the French officials and Indians as far north as present-day Erie, Pennsylvania. The Ohio Company was an important vehicle through which British investors planned to expand into the Ohio Valley, opening new settlements and trading posts for the Indian trade.[30] In 1753 the French themselves began expanding their military control into the Ohio Country, a territory already claimed by the British colonies of Virginia and Pennsylvania. These competing claims led to a war in the colonies called the French and Indian War (1754–62), and contributed to the start of the global Seven Years' War (1756–63). By chance, Washington became involved in its beginning."

Washington had no military training at all. There is nothing in his biography that indicates he would have any understanding how to conduct war let alone defend even himself in any meaningful way. George Washington was a land speculator and leisure class 'fop'.

He was one of the lower level aristocracy class that desired to rise up and to use the system to take advantage of the mass public and not aid the public. This man represents a selfish and frankly evil soul. The Lex Luthor of the Superman film makes for the perfect modern metaphor for a George Washington.

Robert Dinwiddie, lieutenant governor of colonial Virginia, was ordered by the British government to guard the British territorial claims including the Ohio River basin. In late 1753 Dinwiddie ordered Washington to deliver a letter asking the French to vacate the Ohio Valley; he was eager to prove himself as the new adjutant general of the militia, appointed by the Lieutenant Governor himself only a year before. During his trip Washington met with Tanacharison (also called “Half-King”) and other Iroquois chiefs allied with England at Logstown to secure their support in case of a military conflict with the French—indeed Washington and Tanacharison became friends. He delivered the letter to the local French commander Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierre, who politely refused to leave. Washington kept a diary during his expedition which was printed by William Hunter on Dinwiddie’s order and which made Washington’s name recognizable in Virginia.

This increased notoriety helped him to obtain a commission to raise a company of 100 men and start his military career.
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington

The Mythic & Absurd War Accounts are the Stuff of Sunday Comic Strip Funny Pages - The Stuff of The Yellow Journalist & Mythologist.

This is how culture is crafted. Joseph Campbell is known for his work with mythology and we can see why he defines 'yellow journalism'. Yellow journalism is mythology. They are one in the same. Modern news is no different.

"Joseph Campbell defines yellow press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers around 1900 as they battled for circulation.[3]

Frank Luther Mott defines yellow journalism in terms of five characteristics:[4]

  1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
  2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
  3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlinespseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
  4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips
  5. dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system."

"Dinwiddie sent Washington back to the Ohio Country to safeguard an Ohio Company's construction of a fort at present-day Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. However, before he reached the area, a French force drove out colonial traders and began construction of Fort Duquesne. A small detachment of French troops led by Joseph Coulon de Jumonville, was discovered by Tanacharison and a few warriors east of present-day Uniontown, Pennsylvania. On May 28, 1754, Washington and some of his militia unit, aided by their Mingo allies, ambushed the French in what has come to be called the Battle of Jumonville Glen. Exactly what happened during and after the battle is a matter of contention, but several primary accounts agree that the battle lasted about 15 minutes, that Jumonville was killed, and that most of his party were either killed or taken prisoner. Whether Jumonville died at the hands of Tanacharison in cold blood or was somehow shot by an onlooker with a musket as he sat with Washington or by another means, is not completely clear. He was given the epithet Town Destroyer by Tanacharison."

“In 1755 Washington became the senior American aide to British General Edward Braddock on the ill-fated Braddock expedition. This was the largest British expedition to the colonies, and was intended to expel the French from the Ohio Country; the first objective was the capture of Fort Duquesne.[40] Washington initially sought an appointment as a major from Braddock, but upon advice that no rank above captain could be given except by London, he agreed to serve as a staff volunteer. During the passage of the expedition, Washington fell ill with severe headaches and fever; nevertheless, when the pace of the troops continued to slow, Washington recommended to Braddock that the army be split into two divisions – a primary and more lightly, but adequately equipped, “flying column” offensive which could move at a more rapid pace, to be followed by a more heavily armed reinforcing division. Braddock accepted the recommendation (likely made in a council of war including other officers) and took command of the lead division.

In the Battle of the Monongahela the French and their Indian allies ambushed Braddock’s reduced forces and the general was mortally wounded. After suffering devastating casualties, the British panicked and retreated in disarray; however, Washington rode back and forth across the battlefield, rallying the remnants of the British and Virginian forces into an organized retreat. In the process, despite his lingering illness, he demonstrated much bravery and stamina—he had two horses shot from underneath him, while his coat was pierced with four bullets. In his report, Washington blamed the disaster chiefly on the conduct of the redcoats while praising that of the Virginia contingent. Whatever responsibility rested on him for the defeat as a result of his recommendation to Braddock, Washington was not included by the succeeding commander, Col. Thomas Dunbar, in planning subsequent force movements.”

— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington#Braddock_disaster_1755

The description we are to believe is historically accurate reads like a comic book or pulp dime store novel. We take this all for granted, but the truth of our history is that it is mostly made of yellow journalism lies. George Washington is presented to us just like one of the cartoon or film characters we are so accustomed to. The modern day Presidential types and other political figures tend to be just as cartoonish, if not more so.

The Fine Art of Apologetics is Always Employed to Cover the Work of the Lies

"The French responded by attacking and capturing Washington at Fort Necessity in July 1754. However, he was allowed to return with his troops to Virginia. Historian Joseph Ellis concludes that the episode demonstrated Washington's bravery, initiative, inexperience and impetuosity. These events had international consequences; the French accused Washington of assassinating Jumonville, who they claimed was on a diplomatic mission. Both France and Great Britain were ready to fight for control of the region and both sent troops to North America in 1755; war was formally declared in 1756."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington

Want to be that the tales of indians were more myth and bogeyman type scare tactic than not? The historical need to convince the public that they need to support various forms of government is a motive we cannot ignore. These people have always had, means, motive and opportunity to commit the crime of government.

A Biography Fit For A Fart

Washington's ancestors were part of the show, but lower down the pyramid structure of  this royal racket. The Founding Father's Gig would seem to have to do with climbing up the social control pyramid and taking advantage of the New World and the Oceans between to sell the Royals on the idea that this group of men should play gatekeepers and manage the New World investments of the King, for him. The Founders basically concocted a plan which put them in charge of the emerging New World Order. It would take centuries, but the plan has grown to the huge monster most take for granted.

Washington's Dad:

"Augustine Washington (November 12, 1694 – April 12, 1743) was the father of the first U.S. President George Washington. He belonged to the Colony of Virginia's landed gentry and was a planter and slaveholder."

"When Washington came of age (and into his inheritance) in 1715, he married Jane Butler, an orphan who had inherited about 640 acres (2.6 km2) from her father. The young couple settled on the Bridges Creek property. Washington was active in the Anglican Church and in local politics. He took the oath as justice of the peace for the county court in July 1716,[2] and served as county sheriff."

Washington's Grand Dad

"Lawrence Washington (1659 – February 1698)  was a lawyer and planter in colonial Virginia who was educated in England. He was the paternal grandfather of George Washington."

"Lawrence Washington was the eldest son of John Washington (from Essex, England) and Anne Pope. He was born in September 1659, on his father's estate at Bridges Creek, in Westmoreland CountyColony of Virginia. He had two siblings: John (c.1660–1698) and Anne Wright (c.1660–1697).

Lawrence was named for his paternal grandfather Lawrence Washington."

"Lawrence was sent to England to be educated, where he trained as a lawyer.

As the eldest son of the Washington family, Lawrence received the benefits of primogeniture, as was common at the time. Upon the death of his father, Washington inherited two substantial estates on the Potomac RiverMattox Creek (1,850 acres) and Little Hunting Creek (2,500 acres)[4] (which would eventually be renamed Mount Vernon by Lawrence's grandson and namesake, Lawrence Washington).

He did not add substantially to either property during his lifetime, which suggests that he was more interested in politics and the law than in the plantations.[5][6] In notable pursuit of these occupations, Lawrence served as Sheriff of Westmoreland County, and was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1685.[6][7]

In 1688, Lawrence married Mildred Warner, one of three daughters of Mildred Reade and the wealthy Gloucester County planter Augustine Warner, Jr.[6][8] By her, he had three children: John (1692–1746), Augustine (1694–1743), and Mildred (1698–1747). Lawrence died at the age of 38 in February 1698, the same year in which his daughter was born.

Following his death, Mildred Warner Washington married George Gale, who moved the family to WhitehavenEngland. Mildred died in 1701 at the age of 30 following a difficult childbirth.[5][8] Her will stipulated that Gale become the guardian of her children, but in 1704 Lawrence's cousin John Washington successfully petitioned to have custody transferred to him. At that point, the three Washington children returned to Virginia to his care, and they lived near Chotank Creek. He had the use of the lands and personal property they had inherited while he acted as their guardian."

"The origin of the term bar is from the barring furniture dividing a medieval European courtroom, similar to the origin of the term bank for the bench-like location of financial transactions in medieval Europe.  In the USA, Europe and many other countries referring to the law traditions of Europe, the area in front of the barrage is restricted to participants in the trial: the judge or judges, other court officials, the jury (if any), the lawyers for each party, the parties to the case, and witnesses giving testimony. The area behind the bar is open to the public. This restriction is enforced in nearly all courts. In most courts, the bar is represented by a physical partition: a railing or barrier that serves as a bar."

Washington's Great Great Grand Dad

"Lawrence Washington was born in 1602, the fifth son of Lawrence Washington (b. 1565 d. 13 September 1616) of Sulgrave ManorNorthamptonshire, son and heir of Robert Washington esquire, of Sulgrave by his first wife Elizabeth Lyte, daughter and heiress of Walter Lyte of RadwayWarwickshire. His mother was Margaret Butler (d. 16 March 1651), the eldest daughter and co-heiress of William Butler, esquire, of Tyes Hall in CuckfieldSussex, and Margaret Greeke, the daughter of Thomas Greeke, gentleman, of PalstersLancashire."

What is an Esquire Exactly?

The esquire is an official Royal Minion who is low down the Pyramid Food Chain.

THE TRUTH REVEALED!

THE SATANIC MAJESTY OF THE COMMERCIAL WORLD RULES THE GLOBE & CHIEF MAKE BELIEVE JUVENILE

THE SEPARATION WAS SIMPLY A ORGANIZATIONAL CHOICE:

Stand Witness To The Origin of the Two Banking Or Twin Towers of Babel

John Adams, first US ambassador to London and later the second President of the United States of America, meets King George III of Great Britain and Ireland copyright by HBO

John Adams Esquire Bows to His Master The King - The Layers Of Lies & Yellow Journal Myth are clear to us now.

"Esquire (British English: /ᵻˈskwaɪə/;[1] American English: /ˈɛsˌkwaɪr/ or /ᵻˈskwaɪr/;[2] abbreviated Esq.)[3] is usually a courtesy title.

In the United KingdomEsquire historically was a title of respect accorded to men of higher social rank, above the rank of gentleman and below the rank of knight. It later came to be used as a general courtesy title for any man in a formal setting, usually as a suffix to his name, as in "John Smith, Esq.", with no precise significance.[4][5] In certain formal contexts, it remains an indication of a social status that is recognised in the formal Order of Precedence.[6]

In the United StatesEsquire is mostly used to denote a lawyer; in a departure from traditional use, it is used irrespective of gender. In letters, a lawyer is customarily addressed by adding the suffix Esquire (abbreviated Esq.), preceded by a comma, after the lawyer's full name."

"Chief Justice Coke (1552–1634) defined "gentlemen" as those who bear coat armour. From the 16th century such families were defined by the inclusion of their pedigrees within their county's Heraldic Visitations, which necessitated their submitting a return of their pedigree to the visiting herald at the specified location, generally one of the chief towns of the county. The 1623 Heraldic Visitation for Gloucestershire, for example, includes a section at the back headed:[8] "A note of such as were disclaymed to be no gentilmen within the county and city of Gloucester", the list being headed by "Edward Hill, Customer, of Gloucester, neither gentilman of bloud, ancestry nor armes". The list thus identifies those persons whose returns were not accepted, perhaps because fabricated or insufficiently evidenced in some way."

The World of Commerce and Banking is The Satanic 'British' Empire

From a commenter about why Washington is short w/ Adams at the end: "The reason Washington gives Adams a severe tone when he says "Mr. President, nothing more." Is because earlier Adams was fighting to change the name of the President to, something more formal. For Example, "Your Majesty the President."

Layers of Legendary Mythic Lies Revealed:

Alexander Hamilton the master of the American side of the Atlantic Ocean or Bank.

Like any good double speaker, Alexander Hamilton was full of bullfrog. He, like so many other so-called leaders speak with reptile tongues. Their tongues are silver or slivered, meaning their words have two meanings. Liberty is watered down, paper work freedom and not the real and natural thing. Liberty is an illusion and indicates a permission granted by an authority, We need no such authority, 

Secrets In Plain Sight is an awe inspiring exploration of great art, architecture, and urban design which skillfully unveils an unlikely intersection of geometry, politics, numerical philosophy, religious mysticism, new physics, music, astronomy, and history. by ScottOnstott at http://www.secretsinplainsight.com Subscribe to Scott's Youtube channel at: http://www.youtube.com/user/Secretsinplainsight

The Yellow Journal Blueprint For Our 'Matrix' World

"Joseph Campbell defines yellow press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers around 1900 as they battled for circulation.[3]

Frank Luther Mott defines yellow journalism in terms of five characteristics: 

  1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
  2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
  3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
  4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips
  5. dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system."

From the lie of Royalty, to the myths of religions and right on through the funny pages and saturday morning cartoons and now interactively online, the basic blueprint for the fictions sold as fact is yellow:

George Washington is both a full color oil painted cartoon and an example of a so-called expert. Of course we have the fable of the underdog against the system that every school child knows and parrots. Yet the United States Government and all of it's literal Nation building, is nothing but one big yellow minion lie. The county, state and federal governments are corporate entities and do not represent the our interests. These institutions, like all others, exist to serve the Royal Con Game. This is a fact of history and is supported by the literal paper chain trial of treaties and contracts that actually do bind the world. The Queen of England is the Empress of the World, she rules with a paper Crown. If we can make more us us aware, the paper empire falls.

The Founding Fathers were Controlled Opposition and worked for the British King. Make no mistake about it. The Governors of the States were hand picked by the royals and were running things just fine. By 1776 the European Empire had gotten its tentacles into the New World, and true freedom from the feudal wage slave system was over. Little by little we can see how the history since 1776 is really about reducing and limiting our freedom, not expanding it.

Freedom is our natural state and no piece of paper can grant it. The Bill of Rights and all government constitutions are meant to limit our freedom. We've been had

 Government = Mind Control. 

The ultimate result of the so-called American Revolution was to add another layer of needless social control to this racket. What we need to do is dismantle the entire inhuman bestial canard and reduce it to manageable and more locally controlled and very limited bureaucracies. 

The Treaty of Paris of 1783: A Revelation of The Occult

"The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783

In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of America, to forget all past Misunderstandings and Differences that have unhappily interrupted the good Correspondence and Friendship which they mutually wish to restore; and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory Intercourse between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal Advantages and mutual Convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual Peace and Harmony; and having for this desirable End already laid the Foundation of Peace & Reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the Commissioners empowered on each Part, which Articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which Treaty was not to be concluded until Terms of Peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain & France, and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such Treaty accordingly: and the treaty between Great Britain & France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty & the United States of America, in Order to carry into full Effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the Tenor thereof, have constituted & appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his Part, David Hartley, Esqr., Member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their Part, - stop point - John Adams, Esqr., late a Commissioner of the United States of America at the Court of Versailles, late Delegate in Congress from the State of Massachusetts,"

Article 4th:
It is agreed that Creditors on either Side shall meet with no lawful Impediment to the Recovery of the full Value in Sterling Money of all bona fide Debts heretofore contracted.

Article 8th:
The Navigation of the river Mississippi, from its source to the Ocean, shall forever remain free and open to the Subjects of Great Britain and the Citizens of the United States.
— https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=6&page=transcript#

The War Nobody Won: The United States is A Corporation and Works For The British Monarchy

"The trouble with history is, we weren't there when it took place and it can be changed to fit someone's belief and/or traditions, or it can be taught in the public schools to favor a political agenda, and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that we won the Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the contrary. I want you to read this paper with an open mind, and allow yourself to be instructed with the following verifiable facts. You be the judge and don't let prior conclusions on your part or incorrect teaching, keep you from the truth.

I too was always taught in school and in studying our history books that our freedom came from the Declaration of Independence and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I'm going to discuss a few documents that are included at the end of this paper, in the footnotes. The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1). In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers license to settle and colonize America. The definition for license is as follows.

"In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.

Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can better understand what I'm going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject and citizen.

"In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.

"Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government." Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42, 45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed.

I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of citizen from Roman law.

"The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer. L. H. 578." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.

The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was a valid right of the king (Jure Coronae, "In right of the crown," Black's forth Ed.), the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss.

If you'll notice in paragraph 9 the king declares that all his heirs and successors were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today. If you will read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king's declared property was ceded to America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce which was not ceded to America.

This brings us to the Declaration of Independence. Our freedom was declared because the king did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king. It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan "Don't Tread On Me" was the standard borne by the militias.

The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War."

from this website:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/united_states_british_colony.htm

Literary Works Do Bind The World- The Pen is Mightier Than The Sword in A Court of Law. We Have Literal Scripted Society.

"A promissory note is a legal instrument (more particularly, a financial instrument), in which one party (the maker or issuer) promises in writing to pay a determinate sum of money to the other (the payee), either at a fixed or determinable future time or on demand of the payee, under specific terms. If the promissory note is unconditional and readily salable, it is called a negotiable instrument.[1]

Referred to as a note payable in accounting (as distinguished from accounts payable), or commonly as just a "note", it is internationally defined by the Convention providing a uniform law for bills of exchange and promissory notes, although regional variations exist. A banknote is frequently referred to as a promissory note: a promissory note made by a bank and payable to bearer on demand. Mortgage notes are another prominent example."

"A treaty is an agreement under international law entered into by actors in international law, namely sovereign states and international organizations. A treaty may also be known as an (international) agreementprotocolcovenantconventionpact, or exchange of letters, among other terms. Regardless of terminology, all of these forms of agreements are, under international law, equally considered treaties and the rules are the same.

Treaties can be loosely compared to contracts: both are means of willing parties assuming obligations among themselves, and a party to either that fails to live up to their obligations can be held liable under international law."

"A contract is a voluntary arrangement between two or more parties that is enforceable at law as a binding legal agreement. Contract is a branch of the law of obligations in jurisdictions of the civil law tradition.

A contract arises when the parties agree that there is an agreement. Formation of a contract generally requires an offer, acceptanceconsideration, and a mutual intent to be bound. Each party to a contract must have capacity to enter the agreement. Minors, intoxicated persons, and those under a mental affliction may have insufficient capacity to enter a contract. Some types of contracts may require formalities, such as a memorialization in writing."

"Law is a system of rules that are enforced through social institutions to govern behavior.[2] Laws can be made by a collective legislature or by a single legislator, resulting in statutes, by the executive through decrees and regulations, or by judges through binding precedent, normally in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals can create legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that may elect to accept alternative arbitration to the normal court process. The formation of laws themselves may be influenced by a constitution, written or tacit, and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politicseconomicshistory and society in various ways and serves as a mediator of relations between people."

Hamilton The Musical Banking Con

"Alexander Hamilton (January 11, 1755 or 1757 – July 12, 1804) was an American statesman. One of the Founding Fathers of the United States, he was an influential interpreter and promoter of the U.S. Constitution, as well as the founder of the nation's financial system, the Federalist Party, the United States Coast Guard and The New York Post newspaper. As the first Secretary of the Treasury, Hamilton was the main author of the economic policies of the George Washington administration. Hamilton took the lead in the funding of the states' debts by the Federal government, the establishment of a national bank, a system of tariffs, and friendly trade relations with Britain. He was opposed by the Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They denounced Hamilton as too friendly toward Britain and to monarchy in general."

"President George Washington appointed Hamilton as the first United States Secretary of the Treasury on September 11, 1789. He left office on the last day of January 1795. Much of the structure of the government of the United States was worked out in those five years, beginning with the structure and function of the cabinet itself. Biographer Forrest McDonald argues that Hamilton saw his office, like that of the British First Lord of the Treasury, as the equivalent of a Prime Minister; Hamilton would oversee his colleagues under the elective reign of George Washington. Washington did request Hamilton's advice and assistance on matters outside the purview of the Treasury Department. In 1791, while Secretary, Hamilton was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[62] Hamilton submitted various financial reports to Congress. Among these are the First Report on the Public CreditOperations of the Act Laying Duties on ImportsReport on a National Bank, On the Establishment of a Mint, Report on Manufactures, and the Report on a Plan for the Further Support of Public Credit.[63] So, the great enterprise in Hamilton's project of an administrative republic is the establishment of stability."

In the report, Hamilton felt that the debt that the United States had accrued during the Revolutionary War was the price it paid for its liberty. He argued that liberty and property security were inseparable and that the government should honor the contracts, as they formed the basis of public and private morality. To Hamilton, the proper handling of the government debt would also allow America to borrow at affordable interest rates and would also be a stimulant to the economy.
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton#Secretary_of_the_Treasury

Royal Banking Mafia Run Con Job Grows & Grows

The occult truth of the revolution is a revelation is it not? A literal reveal of the overlooked. News of Wars was used to not only create a so-called United States, but to also begin the long tradition of tightening an economic noose around our collective necks. The seemingly eternal gallows pole swinging of the credit card debt based existence many of us call home, has clear source in the mind and evil desires of the Founding Fathers. 

Like any good double speaker, Alexander Hamilton was full of bullfrog. He, like so many other so-called leaders speak with reptile tongues. Their tongues are silver or slivered, meaning their words have two meanings. Liberty is watered down, paper work freedom and not the real and natural thing. Liberty is an illusion and indicates a permission granted by an authority, We need no such authority, 

The only law we must follow is the natural and logical one of not forcing our will onto others. This means no killing or stealing. The governments are guilty this exact crime and they have used the racket of war to commit this natural felony. 

Hamilton establishes everything we take for granted. We have been bamboozled.

Hamilton’s Report on a National Bank was a projection from the first Report on the Public Credit. Although Hamilton had been forming ideas of a national bank as early as 1779, he gathered ideas in various ways over the past eleven years. These included theories from Adam Smith, extensive studies on the Bank of England, the blunders of the Bank of North America and his experience in establishing the Bank of New York. He also used American records from James Wilson, Pelatiah Webster, Gouverneur Morris, and from his assistant Treasury secretary Tench Coxe.

Hamilton suggested that Congress should charter the National Bank with a capitalization of $10 million, one-fifth of which would be handled by the Government. Since the Government did not have the money, it would borrow the money from the bank itself, and repay the loan in ten even annual installments.

The rest was to be available to individual investors. The bank was to be governed by a twenty-five member board of directors that was to represent a large majority of the private shareholders, which Hamilton considered essential for his being under a private direction.

Hamilton’s bank model had many similarities to that of the Bank of England, except Hamilton wanted to exclude the Government from being involved in public debt, but provide a large, firm, and elastic money supply for the functioning of normal businesses and usual economic development, among other differences.

For tax revenue to ignite the bank, it was the same as he had previously proposed; increases on imported spirits: rum, liquor, and whiskey.

In 1791, Hamilton submitted Report on the Establishment of a Mint to the House of Representatives. Most of Hamilton’s ideas for this report were from European economists, resolutions from Continental Congress meetings from 1785 and 1786, and from people such as Gouverneur Morris and Thomas Jefferson.
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton#Secretary_of_the_Treasury
This program captures the backwoods flavor of a fledgling American nation as the newly formed law of the land, a tax on distilled liquor, meets its first challenge. "Offers a thoughtful portrayal of President Washington that reveals many human aspects of the situation."-American Educational & Historical Film Center. An LCA release.

The Origins of the Damage Control Operation or Washington DC

"In the 18th century, the British government operated its colonies under a policy of mercantilism, in which the central government administered its possessions for the economic benefit of the mother country. However, the Thirteen Colonies had a high degree of self-government and active local elections, and increasingly resisted London's demands for more control. In the 1750s, the colonies began collaborating with each other instead of dealing directly with Britain."

"Each of the thirteen colonies developed its own system of limited local self-government under an appointed royal governor, derived from the English system of common lawand composed largely of independent farmers who owned their own land, voted for their local and provincial government, and served on local juries. Colonial decisions were subject to approval by the governor and the home government. There were also substantial populations of African slaves in some of the colonies, especially Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia."

Thirteen Colonies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We can see that there were land owners like Washington and other Founding Fathers, who owned slaves. We had the Royal appointed Governors and we had the working class, which would be slaves and other sorts of lower class, non-plantation owning people. Small family farms and people like cobblers and bakers and other urban dwellers would not be exactly in the same social class as the wealthier and more connected merchants and planation owners. The problem had to do with management of the British Colonies and the danger was that the colonists would get rid of the Governors and British State control over their lives. Control could have either become more locally and community based or the upper class in the colonies would simply have replaced the British hand picked aristocracy. In any case it seems pretty clear that the danger was the British would lose control over their investment. 

The motive of the Founding Fathers would seem to be to take advantage of the situation by becoming the middle men management team for the King and the Royals. These men had no intention of any real disconnection from Britain. History is mostly made of lies.

The Founding Fathers simply replaced the distant British Control with Direct Control. Washington DC is this Direct Control. The secret is the Federal Government works for the British Banking Empire. So do the State Governments, and more than likely even more local governments like counties and cities.

source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_Washington

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Washington_(1659–1698)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Washington_(1602–1653)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(law)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism

1783 Treaty of Paris:

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=6&page=transcript

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fop

http://amhistory.si.edu/militaryhistory/collection/object.asp?ID=763

https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/commission.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Congress

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promissory_note

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton

Thou Shalt Have No Guide Before Me.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.".

A common sense based observation attributed to the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount : “All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.”

The Mosaic law contains a parallel commandment: “Whatever is hurtful to you, do not do to any other person.”

Online Etymology Dictionary

A Foundational English Vocabulary Lesson

guide (v.) 

late 14c., "to lead, direct, conduct," from Old French guider "to guide, lead, conduct" (14c.), earlier guier, from Frankish *witan "show the way" or a similar Germanic source, from Proto-Germanic *witanan "to look after, guard, ascribe to, reproach" (source also of German weisen "to show, point out," Old English witan "to reproach," wite "fine, penalty"), from PIE *weid- "to see" (see vision). The form of the French word influenced by Old Provençal guidar (n.) "guide, leader," or Italian guidare, both from the same source. Related: GuidedguidingGuided missile, one capable of altering course in flight, is from 1945.

guide (n.) 

mid-14c., "one who shows the way," from Old French guide, 14c., verbal noun from guider (see guide (v.)). In book titles from 1610s; meaning "book of information on local sites" is from 1759. In 18c. France, a "for Dummies" or "Idiot's Guide to" book would have been a guid' âne, literally "guide-ass." Guide-dog for the blind is from 1932.

In Germanic mythologyOdin (from Old Norse Óðinn) is a widely revered god. In Norse mythology, from which stems most of our information about the god, Odin is associated with healing, death, royalty, the gallows, knowledge, battle, sorcery, poetry, frenzy, and the runic alphabet, and is the husband of the goddess Frigg. In wider Germanic mythology and paganism, Odin was known in Old English as Wōden, in Old Saxon as Wōdan, and in Old High German as Wuotan or Wōtan, all stemming from the reconstructed Proto-Germanic theonym *wōđanaz.

Odin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Odin 

chief Teutonic god, the All-Father, a 19c. revival in reference to Scandinavian neo-paganism, from Danish, from Old Norse Oðinn, from Proto-Germanic *Wodanaz, name of the chief Germanic god (source of Old English Woden, Old High German Wuotan), from PIE *wod-eno-*wod-ono- "raging, mad, inspired," from root *wet- (1) "to blow; inspire, spiritually arouse" (see wood (adj.)).

Woden 

Anglo-Saxon god, Old English, see Odin.

Wednesday (n.) 

fourth day of the week, Old English wodnesdæg "Woden's day," a Germanic loan-translation of Latin dies Mercurii "day of Mercury" (compare Old Norse Oðinsdagr, Swedish Onsdag, Old Frisian Wonsdei, Middle Dutch Wudensdach). For Woden, see Odin.

Music video by Robert Plant, Alison Krauss performing Please Read The Letter. (C) 2008 Rounder Records Corp.

Screw The Social System!

The Screwtape Letters - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Screw means "defraud, cheat" tape means “narrow strip of cloth used for tying”. Letters are the laws, treaties and contracts that bind the world of course. “a writing, document, record”

Knowledge is Power. God = Guide.

god (n.) 

Old English god "supreme being, deity; the Christian God; image of a god; godlike person," from Proto-Germanic *guthan (source also of Old Saxon, Old Frisian, Dutch god, Old High German got, German Gott, Old Norse guð, Gothic guþ), from PIE *ghut- "that which is invoked" (source also of Old Church Slavonic zovo "to call," Sanskrit huta- "invoked," an epithet of Indra), from root *gheu(e)- "to call, invoke." 

But some trace it to PIE *ghu-to- "poured," from root *gheu- "to pour, pour a libation" (source of Greek khein "to pour," also in the phrase khute gaia "poured earth," referring to a burial mound; see found (v.2)). "Given the Greek facts, the Germanic form may have referred in the first instance to the spirit immanent in a burial mound" [Watkins]. See also Zeus. In either case, not related to good

Popular etymology has long derived God from good; but a comparison of the forms ... shows this to be an error. Moreover, the notion of goodness is not conspicuous in the heathen conception of deity, and in good itself the ethical sense is comparatively late. [Century Dictionary, 1902]

Os or Oz means God

Originally a neuter noun in Germanic, the gender shifted to masculine after the coming of Christianity. Old English god probably was closer in sense to Latin numen. A better word to translate deus might have been Proto-Germanic *ansuz, but this was used only of the highest deities in the Germanic religion, and not of foreign gods, and it was never used of the Christian God. It survives in English mainly in the personal names beginning in Os-.

I want my lawyer, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because it means that I shall be cheated and robbed and cuckolded less often. ... If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.

"The present-day German letter ß (Eszett or scharfes S in German; also used in Low German and historical Upper Sorbian orthographies) is considered to have originated in a ligature of ſz (which is supported by the fact that the second part of the ß glyph usually resembles a Fraktur z), or ſs (see ß for more), or some Tironian notes.[3]

Some old orthographic systems of Slavonic and Baltic languages used ſ and s as two separate letters with different phonetic values. For example, the Bohorič alphabet of the Slovene language included ſ /s/, s /z/, ſh /ʃ/, sh /ʒ/. In the original version of the alphabet, majuscule S was shared by both letters; later a modified character Ş became the counterpart of ſ."

Long s - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

found (adj.) 

"discovered," late 14c., past participle adjective from find (v.). Expression and found attached to the wages or charges in old advertisements for job openings, travelling berths, etc., indicates that meals are provided. It comes from the expression to find one's self "to provide for one's self." "When a laborer engages to provide himself with victuals, he is said to find himself, or to receive day wages" [Bartlett, "Dictionary of Americanisms," 1848]. Hence, so much and found for "wages + meals provided."

found (v.1) 

"lay the basis of, establish," late 13c., from Old French fonder "found, establish; set, place; fashion, make" (12c.), from Latin fundare "to lay the bottom or foundation" of something, from fundus "bottom, foundation" (see fund (n.)). Related: Foundedfounding. Phrase founding fathers with reference to the creators of the American republic is attested from 1916.

found (v.2) 

"to cast metal," late 14c., originally "to mix, mingle," from Old French fondre "pour out, melt, smelt" (12c.), from Latin fundere (past participle fusus) "melt, cast, pour out," from PIE root *gheu- "to pour" (source also of Greek khein "to pour," khoane "funnel," khymos "juice;" Gothic giutan, German gießen, Old English geotan "to pour;" Old English guttas (plural) "bowels, entrails;" Old Norse geysa "to gush;" German Gosse "gutter, drain"). Meaning "to cast metal" is from 1560s. Related: Foundedfounding.

founder (n.2) 

"one who casts metal," c. 1400, agent noun from found (v.2).

foundry (n.) 

c. 1600, "art of casting metal," from French fonderei, from fondre "to cast" (see found (v.2)). Meaning "establishment for the founding of metallic articles" is from 1640s. Related: Foundryman.

founder (n.1) 

"one who establishes, one who sets up or institutes (something)," mid-14c., from Anglo-French fundur, Old French fondeor "founder, originator" (Modern French fondateur), from Latin fundator, agent noun from fundare "to lay a foundation" (see found (v.1)). Fem. form foundress is from early 15c.; also fundatrix (1540s).

foundation (n.) 

late 14c., "action of founding," from Old French fondacion "foundation" (14c.) or directly from Late Latin fundationem (nominative fundatio) "a founding," noun of action from past participle stem of Latin fundare "to lay a bottom or foundation" (see found (v.1)). The Latin word is glossed in Old English by staþol

Specialized sense of "establishment of an institution with an endowment to pay for it" is from late 14c.; meaning "that which is founded" (a college, hospital, etc.) is from 1510s; meaning "funds endowed for benevolent or charitable purposes" is from early 15c. Sense of "solid base of a structure" is from early 15c.

well-founded (adj.) 

late 14c., from well (adv.) + past participle of found (v.1).

newfound (adj.) 

also new-found, late 15c., from new + found (adj.) "discovered."

fondant (n.) 

1877, from French fondant, noun use of present participle of fondre "to melt" (see found (v.2)).

perfuse (v.) 

1520s, from Latin perfusus, past participle of perfundere "to pour over, besprinkle," from per- + fundere (see found (v.2)).

fusible (adj.) 

late 14c., from Medieval Latin fusibilis, from Latin fus-, stem of fundere "to pour, melt" (see found (v.2)). Related: Fusibility.

fondue (n.) 

1878, from French cooking term fondue "a cheese-pudding," literally "melted" (15c.), noun use of fem. of fondu, past participle adjective from fondre "to melt" (see found (v.2)).

geyser (n.) 

1780, extended from Icelandic Geysir, name of a specific hot spring in the valley of Haukadal, literally "the gusher," from Old Norse geysa "to gush," from Proto-Germanic *gausjan, suffixed form of PIE *gheus-, extended form of the root *gheu- "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Taken by foreign writers as the generic name for spouting hot springs, for which the native Icelandic words are hverr "a cauldron," laug "a hot bath."

font (n.2) 

"complete set of characters of a particular face and size of type," 1680s (also fount), earlier "a casting" (1570s), from Middle French fonte "a casting," noun use of fem. past participle of fondre "to melt" (see found (v.2)). So called because all the letters in a given set were cast at the same time.

funnel (n.) 

c. 1400, funellfonel, from Middle French fonel, apparently a word from a southern French dialect, such as Provençal enfounilh (Weekley calls it "a word from the Southern wine trade"), from Late Latin fundibulum, shortened from Latin infundibulum "a funnel or hopper in a mill," from infundere "pour in," from in- "in" + fundere "pour" (see found (v.2)).

fusion (n.) 

1550s, "act of melting by heat," from Middle French fusion or directly from Latin fusionem (nominative fusio) "an outpouring, effusion," noun of action from fusus, past participle of fundere "to pour, melt" (see found (v.2)). Meaning "union or blending of different things; state of being united or blended" is by 1776; used especially in 19c, of politics, in early 20c. of psychology, atoms, and jazz (in nuclear physics sense, first recorded 1947; in musical sense, by 1972).

futile (adj.) 

"incapable of producing result," 1550s, from Middle French futile or directly from Latin futilisfuttilis "vain, worthless, futile," a figurative use, literally "pouring out easily, easily emptied" (the Latin adjective used as a noun meant "a water vessel broad above and pointed below"), hence "leaky, unreliable," from fundere "to pour, melt," from PIE root *gheu- "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Related: Futilely.

The 'Holy Roman Empire' Is Replaced With the 'British Empire'- Which Still Runs The Global Show - "A Rose By Any Other Name..."

See article index for more, but the Royals are all related and the world is run by a Global Mafia Banking Crime Racketeering Ring. The world is bound by treaties and contracts and by constitutions and laws. The paper work of scripts are the literal spells that create the "Magic Kingdom" we call the real world. It is not real, of course, it is artificial and the entire social structure is a con job designed to keep humanity as wage slaves and as prisoners in our own minds. Again, please see the article index for more about this subject. This blog is dedicated to exploring and explaining the con job that is "history". 

Crown Colonies

“A Crown colony, also known in the 17th century as royal colony, was a type of colonial administration of the British overseas territories.

Crown, or royal, colonies were ruled by a governor appointed by the monarch. By the middle of the 19th century, the sovereign appointed royal governors on the advice of the Secretary of State for the Colonies.[1] Under the name of "royal colony", the first of what would later become known as Crown colonies was the English Colony of Virginia in the present-day United States, after the Crown, in 1624, revoked the royal charter it had granted to the Virginia Company, taking over direct administration.[2]

Until the mid-19th century, the term "Crown colony" was primarily used to refer to those colonies that had been acquired through wars, such as Trinidad and Tobago[3] and British Guiana, but after that time it was more broadly applied to any colony other than the Presidencies and provinces of British India and the colonies of settlement, such as The Canadas, Newfoundland, British Columbia, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and New Zealand, later to become the Dominions.[4]

The term continued to be used until 1981, when the British Nationality Act 1981 reclassified the remaining British colonies as "British Dependent Territories". By this time, the term "Crown colony" referred specifically to those colonies ruled directly by a Governor appointed by the Monarch (as was the case in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover to the People's Republic of China), with or without the assistance of some form of council appointed by the Governor. The term was not used to apply to those colonies which were substantially autonomous, usually described as "self-governed colonies" (at that time, primarily Bermuda, which had become a Crown Colony, according to an older definition of the term, when the Crown revoked the Royal Charter it had given to the Somers Isles Company, successor to the Virginia Company, in 1684. This meant that the Crown, from then onwards, appointed the Governor of Bermuda, previously appointed by the Company. Bermuda had already been internally self-governed for sixty-four years, however, and by the Twentieth Century the definition of "Crown Colony" had narrowed to include only those territories without internal self-government. The House of Assembly of Bermuda had existed continuously since its first session in 1620, including through the Commonwealth of England, when for some years the Mother Country itself had no parliament.

From 2002, all remaining British colonies, whether Crown Colonies or self-governed, have been known as British Overseas Territories.[5] The British Government has also encouraged most of the territories to emulate Bermuda and become increasingly self-governing and self-reliant, or, where the poorer colonies are concerned, to pool their resources and rely on each other, freeing the British Government of much of its remaining obligations in the territories, if not of its Sovereignty.

The current Crown dependencies were never considered Crown colonies; the form of government is constitutional monarchy, and the islands voluntarily cooperate with the government of the United Kingdom in certain areas. Sovereignty of the Isle of Man was purchased, and the Channel Islands are the remnants of the Duchy of Normandy.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_colony

We Don't Need No Education

The idea of nationality is promoted by an educational system that was designed to indoctrinate as well as educate. The system was designed by the same Royal nobility that designed War-Games.

The Prussian education system refers to the system of education established in Prussia as a result of educational reforms in the late 18th and early 19th century, which has had widespread influence since. It is predominantly used as an American political slogan in educational reform debates, since it was adopted by all American K–12 public schools and major universities as early as the late 18th century, and is often used as a derogatory term for education in the service of nation-building, teaching children and young adults blind obedience to authority, and reinforcing class and race prejudice.[1] The actual Prussian education system was introduced as a basic concept in the late 18th century and was significantly enhanced after Prussia's defeat in the early stages of the Napoleonic Wars. The Prussian educational reforms inspired other countries and remains important as a biopower in the Foucaultian sense for nation-building.[2] Compulsory education on the Prussian example was soon mirrored in Scandinavia, and US states started to adopt the Prussian example. Early American adopters include Daniel Coit Gilman, who set up The General Education Board, later renamed The Rockefeller Foundation, and first president of Johns Hopkins, John Dewey at the University of Chicago, James Cattell at The University of Pennsylvania and Columbia University, Henry Philip Tappan at The University of Michigan, James Earl Russell at the New York College for the Training of Teachers, and many more. France and the UK failed to introduce similar systems until the 1880s.

The term itself is not at all being used in German literature, which refers to the primary aspects of the Humboldtian education ideal respectively as the Prussian reforms. However, the basic concept remains fruitful and has led to various debates and controversies. 21st century primary and secondary education in Germany and beyond still embodies the legacy of the Prussian education system.”

“The basic foundations of a generic Prussian primary education system were laid out by Frederick the Great with his Generallandschulreglement, a decree of 1763, authored by Johann Julius Hecker. Hecker had already before (in 1748) founded the first teacher's seminary in Prussia. His concept of providing teachers with the means to cultivate mulberries for homespun silk, which was one of Frederick's favorite projects, found the King's favour.[3] It expanded the existing schooling system significantly and required that all young citizens, both girls and boys, be educated by mainly municipality-funded schools from the age of 5 to 13 or 14. Prussia was among the first countries in the world to introduce tax-funded and generally compulsory primary education.[4] In comparison, in France and Great Britain, compulsory schooling was not successfully enacted until the 1880s.[5]

The Prussian system consisted of an eight-year course of primary education, called Volksschule. It provided not only basic technical skills needed in a modernizing world (such as reading and writing), but also music (singing) and religious (Christian) education in close cooperation with the churches and tried to impose a strict ethos of duty, sobriety and discipline. Mathematics and calculus were not compulsory at the start and taking such courses required additional payment by parents. Frederick the Great also formalized further educational stages, the Realschule and as the highest stage the gymnasium (state-funded secondary school), which served as a university-preparatory school.[6]

Construction of schools received some state support, but they were often built on private initiative. Friedrich Eberhard von Rochow, a member of the local gentry and former cavalry officer in Reckahn, Brandenburg, installed such a school. Von Rochow cooperated with Heinrich Julius Bruns (1746–1794), a talented teacher of modest background. The two installed a model school for rural education that attracted more than 1,200 notable visitors between 1777 and 1794.[7]

The Prussian system, after its modest beginnings, succeeded in reaching compulsory attendance, specific training for teachers, national testing for all students (of both genders), a prescribed national curriculum for each grade and mandatory kindergarten.[8] Training of teachers was increasingly organized via private seminaries. Hecker had already in 1748 founded the first "Lehrerseminar", but the density and impact of the seminary system improving significantly until the end of 18th century.[9] In 1810, Prussia introduced state certification requirements for teachers, which significantly raised the standard of teaching.[10] The final examination, Abitur, was introduced in 1788, implemented in all Prussian secondary schools by 1812 and extended to all of Germany in 1871. Passing the Abitur was a prerequisite to entering the learned professions and higher echelons of the civil service. The state-controlled Abitur remains in place in modern Germany."

We Don't Need No Thought Control

"The Prussian system had by the 1830s attained the following characteristics:[11]

  • Free primary schooling, at least for poor citizens
  • Professional teachers trained in specialized colleges
  • A basic salary for teachers and recognition of teaching as a profession
  • An extended school year to better involve children of farmers
  • Funding to build schools
  • Supervision at national and classroom level to ensure quality instruction
  • Curriculum inculcating a strong national identity, involvement of science and technology
  • Secular instruction (but with religion as a topic included in the curriculum)”

 

Prussian education system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Early years to Kriegsspiel

Drawing inspiration from chess, Hellwig, Master of Pages to the Duke of Brunswick, created a battle emulation game in 1780. According to Max Boot's book War Made New (2006, pg 122), sometime between 1803 and 1809, the Prussian General Staff developed war games, with staff officers moving metal pieces around on a game table (with blue pieces representing their forces and red pieces those of the enemy), using dice rolls to indicate random chance and with a referee scoring the results. Increasingly realistic variations became part of military training in the 19th century in many nations, and were called Kriegsspiel or "wargame". Wargames or military exercises remain an important part of military training today.

Modern wargaming originated with the military need to study warfare and to 'reenact' old battles for instructional purposes. The stunning Prussian victory over the Second French Empire in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871 is sometimes partly credited to the training of Prussian officers with the game Kriegsspiel, which was invented around 1811 and gained popularity with many officers in the Prussian army. These first wargames were played with dice which represented "friction", or the intrusion of less than ideal circumstances during a real war (including morale, weather, the fog of war, etc.), though this was usually replaced by an umpire who used his own combat experience to determine the results.”

“"The first specific non-military wargame club was started in Oxford, England, in the 19th century."[3] Naval enthusiast and analyst Fred T. Jane came up with a set of rules for depicting naval actions with the use of model ships, or miniatures around 1898 (Reprinted 2008). The 1905/6 edition of Jane's Fighting Ships includes a revised edition for "The Naval War Game".[4]

H.G. Wells' books Floor Games (1911) and Little Wars (1913) were attempts to codify rules for fighting battles with toy soldiers (miniatures), and make them available to the general public. They were very simple games, and in some ways just provide a context for shooting spring-loaded toy cannons at toy soldiers, but "in his Appendix to Little Wars, Wells speaks of the changes required to convert his admittedly simplistic rules into a more rigorous Kriegspiel."[5] However, Wells also states in his rules that combat "should be by actual gun and rifle fire and not by computation. Things should happen and not be decided," in opposition to the general nature of Kriegspiel play.

In 1940 Fletcher Pratt's Naval War Game was first published. The game started in New York, but other clubs formed around the USA. Jack Coggins was invited by Pratt to participate, and recalled that Pratt's game involved dozens of tiny wooden ships—built to a scale of about one inch to 50 feet—spread over the living room floor of his apartment. Their maneuvers and the results of their battles were calculated via a complex mathematical formula, with scale distances marked off with tape measures.[6] The game's popularity grew and moved to using a ballroom for games with 60 or more players per side.[7] The game was respected by the Naval War College and serving naval officers regularly participated in games[8] For an evaluation of the Fletcher Pratt Game versus reality see Chapter 10 of The Fletcher Pratt Naval Wargame book. link

All of these games were meant to be accessible to the general public, but actual play was made difficult owing to the expense of purchasing an army or navy's worth of miniatures. As leisure time and disposable income generally rose through the 20th Century, miniatures games slowly gained a following. Most gaming groups informally wrote and/or revised their own rules, which were never published.”

 

Wargaming - Wikipedia

The Social Contract: A License to Steal

Stephen Faison cross-examines the idea of a social contract.

"According to classic social contract theory, originally elaborated by Thomas Hobbes in the Seventeenth Century, human beings begin politically unorganised, in what is called a state of nature, and society is created by people either explicitly or tacitly establishing a contract whereby they agree to live together in harmony for their mutual benefit. Social contract theorists seek to demonstrate why a rational individual would voluntarily consent to give up unlimited freedom in the state of nature and accept the limits to liberty required for civil society. These theorists agree that individuals make this exchange in order to ensure, or at least greatly enhance, their ability to survive. But these theorists define survival too narrowly, as ‘defense of life and property’. I want to argue here that the terms of any social contract must be expanded to include the provision of food, clothing, and shelter, because these are also necessary for survival. I contend that any state that fails to provide such maintenance, or at least state employment, and denies any obligation to provide either, forfeits it moral authority to pass judgment on the means citizens use to survive. As I shall demonstrate, under the terms expressed by classic social contract theory a citizen denied maintenance and/or state employment is left on his own, outside the limits of the contracted state, and therefore possesses a license to steal.

The theory that a social contract is the origin and basis of society is controversial, but the version of the theory developed by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government (1689) influenced the Founding Fathers, and is at the heart of the Declaration of Independence. This form of the social contract explains how the state possesses legitimate authority through the consent of the people. So the notion of the social contract is woven into the political system in which US citizens live, even though no citizen was a party to any social contract. Arguments can also be made that some form of tacit agreement to obey the laws of a state is undertaken by anyone who wants to enjoy the benefits of living within any state. Understood this way, the social contract may seem quite reasonable, in principle helping a citizen to accept the state’s requirements, even though, as I will show, the contract does not live up to its promise."

The Social Contract: A License to Steal | Issue 116 | Philosophy Now

Glossary

gust (n.) 

1580s, "sudden squall of wind," possibly a dialectal survival from Old Norse gustr "a cold blast of wind" (related to gusa "to gush, spurt") or Old High German gussa "flood," both from Proto-Germanic *gustiz, from PIE *gheus-, from root *gheu- "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Probably originally in English as a nautical word.

unfounded (adj.) 

1640s, "having no foundation or basis," from un- (1) "not" + past participle of found (v.1).

foundling (n.) 

"deserted infant," c. 1300, from Middle English founden "found," past participle of finden (see find (v.)) + diminutive suffix -ling. Compare Dutch vondeling, German Findling. Middle English also had finding in this sense (late 14c.).

transfuse (v.) 

"to transfer by pouring," early 15c., from Latin transfusus, past participle of transfundere "pour from one container to another," from trans- "across" (see trans-) + fundere "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Related: Transfusedtransfusing.

suffusion (n.) 

late 14c., from Latin suffusionem (nominative suffusio) "a pouring over," noun of action from past participle stem of suffundere "pour upon, overspread, suffuse," from sub "under" (see sub-) + fundere "to pour" (see found (v.2)).

profuse (adj.) 

early 15c., "lavish, extravagant," from Latin profusus "spread out, lavish, extravagant," literally "poured forth," noun use of past participle of profundere"pour forth," from pro- "forth" (see pro-) + fundere "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Meaning "bountiful" is from c. 1600. Related: Profuselyprofuseness.

diffusion (n.) 

late 14c., from Latin diffusionem (nominative diffusio) "a pouring forth," noun of action from past participle stem of diffundere "scatter, pour out," from dis- "apart, in every direction" (see dis-) + fundere "pour" (see found (v.2)). 

ingot (n.) 

late 14c., "mold in which metal is cast," probably from in- (2) "in" + Old English goten, past participle of geotan "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Sense of "mass of cast metal" first attested early 15c.

chyle (n.) 

1540s, from Late Latin chylus, from Greek khylos "juice" (of plants, animals, etc.), from stem of khein "to pour, gush forth," from PIE *ghus-mo-, from root *gheu- "to pour, pour a libation" (see found (v.2)). Compare also chyme.

perfusion (n.) 

1570s, from Middle French perfusion and directly from Latin perfusionem (nominative perfusio) "a pouring over," noun of action from past participle stem of perfundere "pour out," from per- "throughout" (see per) + fundere "pour" (see found (v.2)).

effusion (n.) 

c. 1400, "a pouring out," from Middle French effusion (14c.) and directly from Latin effusionem (nominative effusio) "a pouring forth," noun of action from past participle stem of effundere "pour forth, spread abroad; to lavish, squander, waste," from ex- "out" (see ex-) + fundere "pour" (see found(v.2)). Figuratively, of speech, emotion, etc., from 1650s.

infuse (v.) 

early 15c., "to pour in, introduce, soak (something in liquid)," from Latin infusus, past participle of infundere "to pour into, pour out; press in, crowd in; mix, mingle," from in- "in" (see in- (2)) + fundere "pour, spread" (see found (v.2)). Related: Infusedinfusinginfusoryinfusorial.

refund (v.) 

"to give back, restore," early 15c. (earlier "to pour back," late 14c.), from Old French refunder "restore" and directly from Latin refundere "give back, restore, return," literally "pour back, flow back," from re- "back" (see re-) + fundere "to pour" (see found (v.2)). Specifically of money from 1550s. Related: Refundedrefunding.

parenchyma (n.) 

1650s, Modern Latin, from Greek parenkhyma "something poured in beside," from para- "beside" (see para- (1)) + enkhyma "infusion," from en- "in" + khein "to pour" (see found (v.2)). In ancient physiology, the stuff that was supposed to make up the liver, lungs, etc., which was believed to be formed from blood strained through the capillaries and congealed.

lost (adj.) 

c. 1300; "wasted, ruined, spent in vain," c. 1500; also "no longer to be found, gone astray" (1520s), past participle adjectives from lose. Meaning "spiritually ruined, inaccessible to good influence" is from 1640s. Related: Lostness

Of battles, games, etc. in which one has been defeated, 1724; hence Lost Cause in reference to the bid for independence by the southern states of the U.S., first as the title of the 1866 pro-Southern history of the CSA and the rebellion written by Virginia journalist E.A. Pollard (1832-1872). Lost Generation in reference to the youth that came of age when World War I broke is first attested 1926 in Hemingway's "The Sun Also Rises," where he credits it to Gertrude Stein. Lost-and-found as the name of a department where misplaced articles are brought or sought is by 1907.

confound (v.) 

c. 1300, "make uneasy, abash," from Anglo-French confoundre, Old French confondre (12c.) "crush, ruin, disgrace, throw into disorder," from Latin confundere "to confuse," literally "to pour together, mix, mingle," from com- "together" (see com-) + fundere "to pour" (see found (v.2)). 

The figurative sense of "confuse, fail to distinguish, mix up" emerged in Latin, passed into French and thence into Middle English, where it is mostly found in Scripture; the sense of "destroy utterly" is recorded in English from c. 1300. Meaning "perplex" is late 14c. The Latin past participle confusus, meanwhile, became confused (q.v.).

gut (n.) 

Old English guttas (plural) "bowels, entrails," literally "a channel," related to geotan "to pour," from Proto-Germanic *gut-, from PIE *gheu- "pour" (see found (v.2)). Related to Middle Dutch gote, Dutch goot, German Gosse "gutter, drain," Middle English gote "channel, stream." Meaning "abdomen, belly" is from late 14c. Meaning "narrow passage in a body of water" is from 1530s. Meaning "easy college course" is student slang from 1916, probably from obsolete slang sense of "feast" (the connecting notion is "something that one can eat up"). Sense of "inside contents of anything" (usually plural) is from 1570s. To hate (someone's) guts is first attested 1918. The notion of the intestines as a seat of emotions is ancient (see bowel) and probably explains expressions such as gut reaction (1963), gut feeling (by 1970), and compare gutsGut check attested by 1976.

god (n.) 

Old English god "supreme being, deity; the Christian God; image of a god; godlike person," from Proto-Germanic *guthan (source also of Old Saxon, Old Frisian, Dutch god, Old High German got, German Gott, Old Norse guð, Gothic guþ), from PIE *ghut- "that which is invoked" (source also of Old Church Slavonic zovo "to call," Sanskrit huta- "invoked," an epithet of Indra), from root *gheu(e)- "to call, invoke." 

But some trace it to PIE *ghu-to- "poured," from root *gheu- "to pour, pour a libation" (source of Greek khein "to pour," also in the phrase khute gaia"poured earth," referring to a burial mound; see found (v.2)). "Given the Greek facts, the Germanic form may have referred in the first instance to the spirit immanent in a burial mound" [Watkins]. See also Zeus. In either case, not related to good

Popular etymology has long derived God from good; but a comparison of the forms ... shows this to be an error. Moreover, the notion of goodness is not conspicuous in the heathen conception of deity, and in good itself the ethical sense is comparatively late. [Century Dictionary, 1902]

Originally a neuter noun in Germanic, the gender shifted to masculine after the coming of Christianity. Old English god probably was closer in sense to Latin numen. A better word to translate deus might have been Proto-Germanic *ansuz, but this was used only of the highest deities in the Germanic religion, and not of foreign gods, and it was never used of the Christian God. It survives in English mainly in the personal names beginning in Os-.

I want my lawyer, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because it means that I shall be cheated and robbed and cuckolded less often. ... If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. [Voltaire]

God bless you after someone sneezes is credited to St. Gregory the Great, but the pagan Romans (Absit omen) and Greeks had similar customs. God's gift to _____ is by 1938. God of the gaps means "God considered solely as an explanation for anything not otherwise explained by science;" the exact phrase is from 1949, but the words and the idea have been around since 1894. God-forbids was rhyming slang for kids ("children"). God squad "evangelical organization" is 1969 U.S. student slang. God's acre "burial ground" imitates or partially translates German Gottesacker, where the second element means "field;" the phrase dates to 1610s in English but was noted as a Germanism as late as Longfellow. 

How poore, how narrow, how impious a measure of God, is this, that he must doe, as thou wouldest doe, if thou wert God. [John Donne, sermon preached in St. Paul's Jan. 30, 1624/5]

trove (n.) 

1888, from treasure trove (c. 1550), from Anglo-French tresor trové (late 12c.), translating Latin thesaurus inventus, literally "treasure found." Originally any precious metal object one finds hidden whose owner is unknown. As this usually meant ancient hoards, the term came to mean "treasure hoard" in popular use. Rendered treasure found from mid-15c. French trove is past participle of trover "to find," from Old French trovertorver, of unknown origin, perhaps from Latin turbare "to move" (hence "to seek for") or Medieval Latin *tropare "to compose, sing."

founder (v.) 

early 14c. "to send to the bottom" (transitive); late 14c., "to sink or fall" (intransitive), from Old French fondrer "collapse; submerge, sink, fall to the bottom" (Modern French fondrier), from fond "bottom" (12c.), from Latin fundus "bottom, foundation" (see fund (n.)). Not especially of ships in Middle English, where it typically meant "fall to the ground." Figurative use from 1580s. Related: Founderedfoundering.

foundational (adj.) 

1680s, from foundation + -al (1). Related: Foundationally.

condemned (adj.) 

1540s, "found guilty, at fault," past participle adjective from condemn. Of property, "found unfit for use," from 1798.

lymphocyte (n.) 

cell found in the lymph, 1890, from Latin lympho- "lymph" + -cyte "a cell."

prawn (n.) 

early 15c., prayne, of unknown origin. "No similar name found in other langs." [OED].

fieldstone (n.) 

stone found in fields, as used for buildings, 1797, from field (n.) + stone (n.).

urea (n.) 

compound found in the urine of animals, 1806, Latinized from French urée (1803), from Greek ouron "urine" (see urine).

heparin (n.) 

substance found in the liver, lungs and other tissues, 1918, from Greek hepar "liver" (see hepatitis) + -in (2).

woodlouse (n.) 

also wood-louse, 1610s, from wood (n.) + louse (n.). So called from being found in old wood.

renin (n.) 

enzyme found in kidneys, 1894, from German Renin, from Latin renes "kidneys" + -in (2).

cetyl (n.) 

univalent alcohol radical found in spermaceti, beeswax, etc., 1842, from Latin cetus "whale" (see Cetacea) + -yl.

spessartite (n.) 

manganese garnet, 1853, earlier spessartine (1837), from French spessartine (1832), from Spessart, district in Bavaria where it is found.

served (adj.) 

"found guilty, convicted; ordered to be punished or transported; beaten," 1811, slang past participle adjective from serve (v.).