"Holocaust denial, the denial of the systematic genocidal killing of 6 million Jews and people of various ethnic groups in Europe by Nazi Germany in the 1930s ..."
The Holocaust Denial Victim Shield Card: Hollywood and The Mainstream Media Will Never Let Us Forget World War Two
Hollywood Truly Does Heart Hitler
Please note: I think we should question official narratives. I think that wars as we understand them are little more than scripted theatrical propaganda product. Hollywood has always acted as a propaganda weapon for the United States Governent and Military. Psychological warfare is a very real phenomena and one that relies on the modern medium of moving picture with sound to work its magical hold it has over human consciousness. I think that the idea that six million jewish people were killed is mythic exaggeration. I am not claiming nobody died and that Jewish people weren't rounded up and tattooed, sent to prison camps, treated in inhuman manner and weren't killed at all. I do think people are capable of acting in inhuman ways. I do however, think the idea that the Nazi's were involved with the mass gassing of the Jewish population during the war to be vey fallacious for many reasons, chief among them is basic logistics and the improbability of engineering gas based death showers. The number of claimed deaths (6 million) is also problematic. That's a huge number and seems to be little more than an advertising-like, public relations (propaganda) claim, i.e. hyperbole. Scale and proportion matter and mythic storytelling passed off as history tends towards Paul Bunyan style imaginings.
Censorship = Thought Control
We should never fear sharing ideas. What we should be concerned with are those who think their ideas need to be embodied in the form of laws and other social customs. We aren't supposed to question the reality and validity of highly emotional victim stories. We are supposed to be ashamed to question such things. It is supped to be socially unacceptable and even in some places it is illegal. How is any of that a sign of freedom or bravery? All I can see are examples of submission and slavery.
Emotionally Engaging Victim Stories Become Impetus For New Laws & Other Forms of Social Change
Questioning the reality of something like the holocaust is logical. Rounding people up and marching them off to camps is evil.
Governments seem to enjoy the latter and seem to really dislike the former. Big prison and the legal system is a huge moneymaking business. Truth can take a back seat to profitable law based practices and commercial opportunity. Consider all the money to be made just providing supplies for the prison and legal industries.The people who make prison jumpsuits and who sell things like toilet paper to the court houses and law firms and prisons and capitol buildings have incentive to keep the inhuman system of defining all sins as crimes going on forever. In fact there is incentive to keep adding to the list of fees, fines, crimes, and jail time.
Nation States And Religions Are Fake: These Are Tools Used To Manage Global Human Resource
It is easier to manage humanity when we are divided and conquered into more easily managed shepherded and like minded communities. This is how logic gets replaced with fallacious emotional based jingoism and parroted thought patterns.
Keep Them Laughing
Entertainment is more important than factual accuracy. A good compelling narrative trumps rational discourse. The mass pubic is more easily led by emotional storytelling that acts like magical charming spell than by appeals to logic and common sense. Most of us tend to believe stories we cannot verify, without any application of critical judgement. We tend to repeat telephone game hearsay tales without thought These underlying assumptions tend to go forever unquestioned, creating a human population that believes in many fantastic and completely unverifiable things they really should not.
Human nature has long been used against us to keep us in our docile and submissive positions. Our natural inclination to empathy is always used by means of the medium of victim News, which a very real weapon of governmental, propaganda terrorism.
Greed, another all too common trait, is impetus for implementing all sorts of inhuman systems of enforced social order.
Governmental growth is a cancerous blight with many witting and unwitting agents.
Simon Says: Keep Them Laughing
"The very first thing that is important to know about Simon Wiesenthal is that before the war he was an amateur stand-up comedian, so he had a great sense of humor. Over the years, he learned that in order to pass on the information about this very dark subject, he had to do it in a palatable way so that people kept wanting to listen. He was a very entertaining person so the show is not a drag; you’ll find yourself laughing more than you ever thought you would. You leave the theatre feeling uplifted."
image and quote source: 5 Things You Should Know About “The Jewish James Bond ...
Simon Wiesenthal Is Part of the Anne Frank Story
"Did you know if it wasn't for Simon Wiesenthal and his work, you probably would never have heard of Anne Frank? In the 1950s after Anne Frank, the Diary of a Young Girl came out and became so popular, there was a very powerful movement in Germany and Austria that said the book was a fraud and that Anne Frank never existed."
"Soldiers and Nazi officers living in postwar Europe started to tell their children, ‘Don’t listen to all the stuff they say about us because it’s not true; and Anne Frank was made up by the Jews to get more restitution money from Germany.’ This generation is referred to in the play as ‘the doubting boys in Europe,’ and Wiesenthal had a confrontation with one of these boys in a malt shop. And he said, ‘What would it take for me to convince you that Anne Frank actually existed? If I found the officer who actually arrested her would you believe?’ And the kid said, ‘Yeah but only if he himself admitted to it, I would have to believe.’ Wiesenthal said it was the hardest search he ever had because he had to find an officer who arrested 1 of a million and a half children 14 years ago. But he did find the man, Karl Silberbauer, and the man confessed and that became front-page news throughout the world. Then all these teenagers had to turn around and look at their fathers and say, ‘What other lies did you tell me?’ So if it wasn't for Wiesenthal’s work, Anne Frank would be dismissed as Jewish propaganda."
We are not supposed to state and share the obvious.
In some places it is not just impolite to question official proclamation, it is against the law.
Does that sound like a good idea to you? Is that not the definition of tyranny and the kind of behavior the Nazis engaged in?
Anne Frank: World War Two Era Simulated Victim?
Karl Pilkington on Anne Frank (with Ricky Gervais & Stephen Merchant) source: Bald Manc
"The Nazi Hunter's Other Side"
"Drawing attention to himself and his successes was the Nazi hunter's modus operandi -- and he became world-famous in the process. Having survived the Holocaust himself, Wiesenthal spent the next 60 years ferreting out Nazi war criminals who had managed to disappear. Indeed, Wiesenthal's tireless search turned him into a celebrity. He was portrayed as a hero in films, American presidents invited him to the White House, and dozens of universities awarded him honorary doctorates.
But there was also another side to the Nazi hunter: He used questionable methods. He took credit for the achievements of others. And, over the years, he succeeded in antagonizing many people who actually shared the same goals. This side of Wiesenthal is presented in "Simon Wiesenthal: The Life and Legends," a new biography by Tom Segev, an Israeli historian and journalist."
"Although Segev describes Wiesenthal as a "brave man who launched some breathtaking ventures," he also writes that Wiesenthal had a "soaring ego" and a harmful "tendency to fantasize."
We aren't supposed to question victim's stories are we? How dare we?
The victim is often used as fallacious sympathetic shield. Critical thought is not welcome. Martyrs need a faithful flock.
"Was Anne Frank's Diary a Hoax?
BY TERESSA HENDRY
"Most Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank actually wrote this diary? And if so, should an author be permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal?"
Was Anne Frank's Diary a Hoax?
"Is propaganda which involves exaggeration and distortion of facts, however worthy the cause for which it is used, ever justified? Is fiction, labeled with the brand of authenticity, ever impossible? No doubt Harriet Beecher Stowe, when she wrote Uncle Tom's Cabin, did so prompted by the highest of motives. Yet she, herself, relates the incident when she first met Abraham Lincoln in 1863, when he commented: "So you are the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!"
Few will deny that the printed word in this instance fanned the flames of passion which brought about one of the bloodiest and saddest wars of history, with brother sometimes pitted against brother, father against son. Perhaps if there had been less appeal to the emotions the problems might have resolved themselves through peaceful means. However, almost universally read at the time, few people then recognized the potency of one small book or the injustice done the South through its wide acceptance as a fair picture of slavery in the South.
Propaganda, as a weapon of psychological warfare is even in wider use today. Communists are masters of the art. Often they use the direct approach; just as often they employ diversion tactics to focus the eyes and cars of the world in directions other than where the real conflict is being waged. For many years, through propaganda alone, the deadly threat of Hitler and Nazism has been constantly held before the public in a diversion maneuver to keep attention from being directed against the live threat of Stalin, Khrushchev and Communism. Such has been the effect, if not the deliberate intention of many who have promoted its distribution, of a book of dynamic appeal -- The Diary Of Anne Frank. It has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror. Most Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank actually wrote this diary? And if so, should an author be permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal?"
Myths Die Hard
"More than five years ago the Swedish journal Fria Ord published two articles commenting on The Diary Of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter, as follows: History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, "Anne Frank's Diary." Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager. A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the "Anne Frank Diary." Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, has promised to pay to his race-kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and "implanted" it in the diary as being his daughter's intellectual work."
"Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been "officially reported"? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?"
"Inquiry of the County Clerk, New York County, as to the facts of the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as "attorneys for the respondent." Reference was to "The Dairy of Anne Frank 2203-58." A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that "Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had nothing to do with the Anne Frank case."
On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been forwarded: It was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000, in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled, while an appeal from Judge Coleman's decision was pending.
I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman's decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported, both in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk's office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one which must include Judge Coleman's decision. Unfortunately, our file is in storage and I cannot, locate a copy of that decision as it appeared in the New York Law Journal early in the year 1960.
The Diary Of Anne Frank was first published in 1952 and immediately became a bestseller. It has been republished in paperback, 40 printings. It is impossible to estimate how many people have been touched and aroused by the movie production.
Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been "officially reported"? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?"
Recently the Idaho Daily Statesman carried the following editorial: Remember Anne Frank
"A young Jewish girl whose diary stirred millions around the world, was remembered last week in a simple ceremony in Amsterdam marking the 20th anniversary of her arrest by the Nazis. The story of Anne Frank still causes free-thinking people to meditate on the ways of the world, the insane manner-of men hungry for power. Remember? From the time she was 12 until before her death at 14 in a Nazi concentration camp, Anne lived with her parents, a sister and four other Jewish persons in one room concealed in the back of a house in Amsterdam. All but Anne's father perished in the concentration camp. Upon his liberation he returned to the Amsterdam house and found his daughter's famous diary. This youngster always had hopes for the future, but she was to be denied the right to live. She was a Jew.
Racial hatred is the worst sickness which mankind endures. It erodes a man's conscience, makes a mockery out of his religion. Fan the flames of hate and the youngest souls are scarred, and often tragedy results regardless of age. Americans take exception to violence. This is a democracy of peoples. It is difficult to understand how supposedly liberty loving people can allow the treacherous disease of racial hatred to spread among thinking adults, among innocent children. The Boise Public Library has a book which can tell the story better. We recommend The Diary of Anne Frank. Read it and think before you, too, may spew out a bit of racial hatred.
Similar comment appears from time to time. School publications for years have recommended this book for young people, presenting it as the work of Anne Frank. Advertising in advance of the movie showings has played up the "factual" nature of the drama being presented. Do not writers of such editorials and promotors of such advertising, "fan the flames of hate" they rightly profess to deplore? Many American Jews were shocked at the handling of the Eichmann case, the distortions contained in the book Exodus and its movie counterpart, but their protests have had little publicity outside of their own organ, Issues, by the American Council for Judaism. Others who have expressed the same convictions have been charged with anti-Semitism. Yet it is to be noted that both Otto Frank and his accuser Meyer Levin, are Jewish, so a similar charge would hardly be applicable in pursuing this subject to an honest conclusion, in fairness to all.
File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk's office should be opened to the public view and its content thoroughly publicized. Misrepresentation, exaggeration, and falsification has too often colored the judgment of good citizens. If Mr. Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what we have been led to believe is the literary work of his daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed."
"To label fiction as fact is never justified nor should it be condoned."
"With a reputation as a storyteller, Wiesenthal was the author of several memoirs containing tales that are only loosely based on actual events. In particular, he exaggerated his role in the capture of Eichmann in 1960."
"The Simon Wiesenthal Center, located in Los Angeles, is named in his honor."
"Simon Wiesenthal ... was a Jewish Austrian Holocaust survivor, Nazi hunter, and writer."
"He studied architecture and was living in Lwów at the outbreak of World War II. He survived the Janowska concentration camp (late 1941 to September 1944), the Kraków-Płaszów concentration camp (September to October 1944), the Gross-Rosen concentration camp, a death march to Chemnitz, Buchenwald, and the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp (February to 5 May 1945).
After the war, Wiesenthal dedicated most of his life to tracking down and gathering information on fugitive Nazi war criminals so that they could be brought to trial. In 1947 he co-founded the Jewish Historical Documentation Centre in Linz, Austria, where he and others gathered information for future war crime trials and aided refugees in their search for lost relatives. He opened the Documentation Centre of the Association of Jewish Victims of the Nazi Regime in Viennain 1961 and continued to try to locate missing Nazi war criminals. He played a small role in locating Adolf Eichmann, who was captured in Buenos Aires in 1960, and worked closely with the Austrian justice ministry to prepare a dossier on Franz Stangl, who was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1971.
In the 1970s and 1980s, Wiesenthal was involved in two high-profile events involving Austrian politicians. Shortly after Bruno Kreisky was inaugurated as Austrian chancellor in April 1970, Wiesenthal pointed out to the press that four of his new cabinet appointees had been members of the Nazi Party. Kreisky, angry, called Wiesenthal a "Jewish fascist", likened his organisation to the Mafia, and accused him of collaborating with the Nazis. Wiesenthal successfully sued for libel, the suit ending in 1989. In 1986, Wiesenthal was involved in the case of Kurt Waldheim, whose Nazi past was revealed in the lead-up to the 1986 Austrian presidential elections. Wiesenthal, embarrassed that he had previously cleared Waldheim of any wrongdoing, suffered much negative publicity as a result of this event.
With a reputation as a storyteller, Wiesenthal was the author of several memoirs containing tales that are only loosely based on actual events. In particular, he exaggerated his role in the capture of Eichmann in 1960. Wiesenthal died in his sleep at age 96 in Vienna on 20 September 2005 and was buried in the city of Herzliya in Israel. The Simon Wiesenthal Center, located in Los Angeles, is named in his honor."
source: Simon Wiesenthal - Wikipedia
Hollywood Was & Is The Propaganda Weapon of The United States Government
"The US government might show the unreleased Jerry Lewis Holocaust comedy in 10 years"
Jerry Lewis' The Day The Clown Cried
"The Day the Clown Cried is an unreleased 1972 American drama film directed by and starring Jerry Lewis. It is based on a script of the same name by Joan O'Brien, who had co-written the original script with Charles Denton ten years previously. The film was met with controversy regarding its premise and content, which features a circus clown who is imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp. Lewis repeatedly insisted that The Day the Clown Cried would never be released because it is an embarrassingly "bad work" of which he was ashamed. Despite claims the film will never be screened, Lewis reportedly donated a copy of the film to the Library of Congress in 2015, under the stipulation that it wouldn't be screened before June 2024."
"Lewis plays a washed-up German circus clown named Helmut Doork during the beginning of World War II and the Holocaust. Although he was once a famous performer who toured North America and Europe with the Ringling Brothers, Doork is now past his prime and receives little respect. After Doork causes an accident during a show, the head clown convinces the circus owner to demote Doork. Upon returning home, Doork confides his problems to his wife Ada, and she encourages him to stand up for himself. After going back to the circus, Helmut overhears the circus owner agreeing to fire him after the head clown issues an ultimatum. A distraught Helmut is arrested later by the Gestapo for ranting about Germany and drunkenly mocking Adolf Hitler in a bar. Following an interrogation at the Gestapo headquarters, he is imprisoned in a Nazi camp for political prisoners. For the next three to four years, he remains there while hoping for a trial and a chance to plead his case.
He tries to maintain his status among the other inmates by bragging about what a famous performer he once was. His only friend in prison is a good-hearted German named Johann Keltner, whose reason for being interned is never fully revealed but is implied to be his outspoken opposition to the Nazis. The camp receives a large group of Jewish prisoners, including several children. The other prisoners goad Doork into performing for them, but he does not realize he actually is not very good. The other prisoners beat him up and leave him in the courtyard to sulk about his predicament. He sees a group of Jewish children laughing at him from the other side of the camp, where the Jewish prisoners are being kept away from everyone else. Delighted to be appreciated again, Helmut performs for them and gains an audience for a while, until the new prison commandant orders that he stop.
Helmut learns that fraternizing with Jewish prisoners is strictly forbidden. Unable to leave the children in a state of unhappiness, he continues to perform for them. The SS guards break up one of his performances; they knock him unconscious and warn the children away from the barbed-wire fence. Horrified, Keltner fights off one of the guards, but he is quickly cornered and beaten to death. Doork is placed in solitary confinement. Seeing a use for him, the commandant assigns him to help load Jewish children on trains leading out of the internment camp, with the promise his case will be reviewed. By a twist of fate, he ends up accidentally accompanying the children on a boxcar train to Auschwitz, and he is eventually used, in Pied Piper fashion, to help lead the Jewish children to their deaths in the gas chamber.
Knowing the fear the children will feel, he begs to be allowed to spend the last few moments with them. Leading them to the "showers," he becomes increasingly dependent on a miracle, but there is none. He is so filled with remorse that he remains with them. As the children laugh at his antics, the film ends."
image and quote source: The Day the Clown Cried - Wikipedia
Jerry Lewis: The Holocaust Circus Clown
The Story Of The Day The Clown Cried source: BBC South Today
Jerry Lewis Holocaust Clown Film Released Footage The Day the Clown Cried source: The Lost Media Wiki
After Stanley Kubrick
"Christiane Kubrick had 42 wonderful years with her husband. But in the decade since his death, she has been beset by tragedy. For the first time, she talks about losing one daughter to cancer, another to Scientology – and why her uncle made films for Goebbels."
"There were some things I always felt nervous asking her about, like anything to do with her uncle Veit Harlan, but tonight over dinner – Paths of Glory making her nostalgic for the early days, I think – she brings the subject up herself. "Stanley and I came from such different, such grotesquely opposite backgrounds," she says. "I think it gave us an extra something. I had an appalling, catastrophic background for someone like Stanley." She pauses. "For me, my uncle was great fun. He and my father planned to join the circus. They were acrobats. They threw me around. It was a complete clown's world. Nobody can imagine that you can know someone who was so guilty so intimately – and yet not know." It turned out that when Harlan wasn't clowning around with Christiane, he was writing and directing propaganda films for Goebbels. The most notorious was a film called Jud Süss, in which venal, immoral Jews take over and ruin a German city, stealing riches, defiling Aryan women, etc. The film was shown to SS units before they were sent out to attack Jews. Harlan was tried twice for war crimes, and exonerated, proving that Goebbels had interfered with Jud Süss, forcing him to re-edit and inject more antisemitism.
"Where my uncle was an enormous fool, as many talented people are, was that he mistook his gift for intelligence," says Christiane. "He was a great big famous film person. He looked better and talked better and had enormous charm. So he thought he was also far more intelligent than Mr Goebbels. Goebbels was 10,000 times smarter than my uncle." She pauses. "Film people, actors, are puppets. We are silly. We are silly folk." Christiane says her uncle's story reinforced for Stanley and her their great principle in life: always be suspicious of people who have, or crave, power. "All Stanley's life he said, 'Never, ever go near power. Don't become friends with anyone who has real power. It's dangerous.' We both were very nervous on journeys when you have to show your passport. He did not like that moment. We always had to go through separate entrances, he with [our] two American daughters upstairs, and me with my German daughter downstairs. The foreigners downstairs! He'd be looking for us nervously. Would he ever get us back?" "
"Harlan was born in Berlin. After studying under Max Reinhardt, he first appeared on the stage in 1915 and, after World War I, worked in the Berlin stage. In 1922 he married Jewish actress and cabaret singer Dora Gerson; the couple divorced in 1924. Gerson later died at Auschwitz with her family. In 1929, he married Hilde Körber, having three children with her before divorcing her for political reasons related to the influence of National Socialism. One of their children, Thomas Harlan, became a writer and director in his own right. Afterwards, he married the Swedishactress Kristina Söderbaum, for whom he wrote several tragic roles which included some very dramatic suicide scenes, further increasing their popularity with the German cinema audience."
"After the war Harlan was charged with participating in the anti-Semitic movement and aiding the Nazis. But he successfully defended himself by arguing that the Nazis controlled his work and that he should not be held personally responsible for its content. In 1949, Harlan was charged with crimes against humanity for his role as director of Jud Süß. The Hamburg Criminal Chamber of the Regional Court (Schwurgericht) acquitted Harlan of the charges; however, the court of the British occupation zone nullified the acquittal. In 1951, Harlan sued for an injunction against Hamburg politician Erich Lüth for publicly calling for a boycott of Unsterbliche Geliebte (Immortal Beloved). The District Court in Hamburg granted Harlan's suit and ordered that Lüth forbear from making such public appeals. However, the lower court decision was ultimately overturned in 1958 by the Federal Constitutional Court because it infringed on Lüth's right to freedom of expression. This was a landmark decision because it clarified the importance of the constitutional civil rights in disputes between individuals. Harlan made a total of nine films between 1950 and 1958, dying in 1964 while on vacation in Capri."
Carving Up The World Again..A Wall and Not A Fence
"Guaranteed immunity 'behind a wall and not a fence'."
"They're carving up the world again, it's getting kind of tense, a whole lotta pasture and very little sense."
Robert Plant - Carving Up The World Again
Robert Plant - Carving Up the World Again... a wall and not a fence | Official Audio source: Robert Plant
Ours is an artificial world of governance conducted from behind protected walls of nonsense.
Propaganda is governmentally concocted unverifiable hearsay myth, which spreads like cancerous wildfire. Nonsense is always unverifiable.
Nation States Are Fake: National Identities Are Products
There is no evidence that the Nation State of Israel ever existed before it was concocted and established after World War Two as a result of the Holocaust.
The American Revolution is another mythic pile of steaming bull and is not as it seems. In fact our collective, world wide history is cloaked with many layers of bullshit. One needs to separate this from any truth one might be able to find in the historical record; it helps to read between the lines and to be aware of the damage controlling art of the limited hang out of apologetic information. It helps to be aware that the Royal lineages still exist and still retain more legal power than most might know and that from original feudal seed the modern world of banking and global commerce sprang. The original Royal heads have long been joined by hydra like fellows that only continue to spawn new members. In this manner the neo-feudal pyramid structure continues to grow. Governments with needless borders and security checks, passports and the rest are clear signs we are not living in the lands of the free and brave, but instead we dwell in the land of the ever mentally enslaved and afraid. Religions and other divides, mental and physical, are useful tools used for the social dominance of the many by the few. Divide and conquer is an effective, fractal strategy. We can see it on all levels of political existence. We have the local levels of the partisan divide of political party that reach up to the National level; and we have the seeming divisions of Nation state borders and all that goes along with it. If we had no such imagined bounds, we'd have little impetus to buy into the constant bogeyman threat of the (governmentally defined) enemy that is the other, no allied, country's government. With no country borders we could have no world wars.
Russia and the U.S.A. are like the Democratic and The Republican parties and like Pepsi and Coke. All are examples of controlled oppositional choices that lead to essentially the same fate, with the only differences being shallow ones that have more to do with personal preferences than anything that really matters. It's funny how Nationalism gets blamed for things like world wars and this blame then seems to land on the proverbial shoulders of "We the People" as if the mass public insisted on going to war in the first place and as if it doesn't take sustained propaganda campaigns to get people psyched up to march off to war. The obvious truth is that the public is manipulated into joining and otherwise supporting war efforts, just like the public is manipulated into buying needless mass produced commercial products.
Nationalism is an idea governments promote. National identities are artifacts of a social control mechanism that relies on us associating ourselves with flags and governmental buildings and government rituals like pledges of allegiances and standing, or genuflecting, for bad songs like National anthems. Nationalism is secular religion, the flags replace cross and star of David, the pledges and bad music replace priest led prayer and choir song. It does not matter if people choose religion or governmental identity, both are cultural weapons long used to keep the mass of humanity herded into self identifying communities of like minded zombies who (ideally) no longer can really be considered to be individuals.
"Sir Isaac Newton Predicted The End Of The World, And It’s SOON"
There's nothing like screaming yellow journal tabloid headline, is there?
"When Sir Isaac Newton wrote out his notes explaining the laws of gravity, he also wrote down his own “end of days” prediction. And it’s sooner than expected.
His work on the matter, which was kept in a trunk in the house of the Earl of Portsmouth for 250 years, read: “It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fanciful men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, and by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail.”
"He also wrote in his notes, that “wicked nations” will be in ruins and the Jews will return from “captivity” to their homeland before the end of the world which could be interpreted as the establishment of Israel after the Second World War. Newton wrote that “the ruin of the wicked nations, the end of weeping and of all troubles, the return of the Jews (from) captivity and their setting up a flourishing and everlasting Kingdom”. The notes are currently on show in Jerusalem’s Hebrew University and the curator of the exhibition, Yemima Ben-Menahem, said that the famous physicist had been guided by religion, and not science."
“These documents show a scientist guided by religious fervor, by a desire to see God’s actions in the world,” said Ben-Menahem. Sir Isaac had a morbid and almost macabre fascination with the end of the world, and the topic was even the subject of a 2003 documentary titled, Newton: The Dark Heretic.The producer of that documentary, Malcolm Neaum, said: “What has been coming out over the past 10 years is what an apocalyptic thinker Newton was. He spent something like 50 years and wrote 4,500 pages trying to predict when the end of the world was coming. But until now it was not known that he ever wrote down a final figure. He was very reluctant to do so.”
The godfather of physics must have eventually been confident, however. Because he wrote, in his findings from 1704, that the world is set to end in the year 2060, or later. That’s exactly 1,260 years after the foundation of the Holy Roman Empire. The famous scientist reached his apocalyptic conclusion by analyzing the Bible’s Book of Daniel according to his note, but how he reached the conclusion exactly is still a mystery more than 300 years later.
This article has been contributed by SHTF Plan. Visit www.SHTFplan.com for alternative news, commentary and preparedness info."
source: http://beforeitsnews.com/survival/2017/10/sir-isaac-newton-predicted-the-end-of-the-world-and-its-soon-2680230.html • http://www.openculture.com/2015/10/in-1704-isaac-newton-predicts-the-world-will-end-in-2060.html