A Proper Gander At Propaganda

TRUTH TRANSCENDS COMMUNITY

PLEASE NOTE: This is not a conspiracy theory blog.

This website exists to serve as public resource for reverse imagineering world-wide culture, one that takes a critical look at the numerous artifacts and other types of relics that represent our shared collective international heritage. This blog is dedicated to examining social engineering and the use of tax funded governmental propaganda, and the mainstream media, as international human resource management tools.

About The AA Morris Proper Gander At Propaganda Podcast: Coming to you from one of the suburban metropolitan melting pots of international culture, outside of one of the multimedia capitals of the world, New York City, the Proper Gander at Propaganda podcast is meant to be a filter free look at our shared international cultural heritage, our shared social media infused and obsessed present, and what our children and their children could be looking forward to. This link will bring you to the podcast page of this website, with embedded squarespace audio: link: http://www.aamorris.net/podcast/

Thank you for taking the time to read this,

AA "The Proper Gander" Morris

Article Index Link  •  Tip Jar Link: For those who wish to support independent media.

Web addresses: www.aamorris.net or www.aamorris.com

Orbits Do Not Exist: The Solar System Model To Scale

 

Happy Sir Isaac Newton Day!

Forget all of Sir Isaac's "Laws" The guy's as fake as Saturn's Satanic Clause.

Newton Wrong Orbits Do Not Exist.jpg

"...Isaac Newton was born on January 4, 1643 (December 25, 1642, in the same year that Galileo died, in the old style Gregorian calendar) ..."

source: This date in science: Isaac Newton is born | Human World | EarthSky

This is a focused article that demonstrates the absurdity of the Solar System model. This version lacks all the mythological musings from the prior version of this article.

(This article last updated December 25, 2017 • Please excuse the inevitable typo, auto correct is a mischievous little monkey, AA Morris)

 

Sunday Becomes Monday - Merry X-Mas! 

The day of the Sun literally turns into the day of the Moon.

Monday - Online Etymology Dictionary

'Tis the Season... 

"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, a time to reap that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; ... This line and the title phrase "Turn!"

source: Turn! Turn! Turn! - Wikipedia

Happy Birthday to Sol Invictus The Unconquered Sun!

"Sol Invictus ("Unconquered Sun") was the official sun god of the later Roman Empire and a patron of soldiers. On 25 December 274 AD the Roman emperor Aurelian made it an official cult alongside the traditional Roman cults. Scholars disagree about whether the new deity was a refoundation of the ancient Latin cult of Sol ...Since the 12th century there have been speculations that the near-solstice date of 25 December for Christmas was selected because it was the date of the festival of Dies Natalis Solis Invicti, but this has been contested by The Calculation Hypothesis through the writings of the Early Christian Fathers. For example, Hippolytus of Rome, between 202 and 211 AD, said in his commentary of the Book of Daniel that the Birth of Jesus is December 25th, though this passage is generally considered a late interpolation. The manuscript includes another passage, one that is more likely to be authentic, that gives the passion as March 25."

source: Sol Invictus - Wikipedia


AA+Morris+Solar+System+to+Scale.gif

Presents: An Imagined God Like Point of View

7 Miles of Space • The Solar System To Scale

The Solar System Model is a Work of Fiction like all other Religious Artifacts

Existential dilemmas have long been used to socially engineer human civilizations. The moving lights in the sky have long been used as the ultimate Platonic Shadow Cave theater. When the stars and Sun are used with mechanical clocks to figure out lines of longitude to map the World. this is demonstrable science. Using the celestial phenomena to design a Cosmic Universal Order is a religion. "I don't know" is the most honest answer that nobody seems interested in hearing. Some mysteries might simply be beyond human understanding. Most humans have inflated ego identities and seem to think they need to explain that which might be beyond explanation. These culturally indoctrinated minds seem to let language and thinking itself drive them into seeming life long Quixotic quests. Self identified college educated and degree bearing minds can't seem to see past their own obvious prejudices. They seem hell bent on insisting "we" need to answer questions that might just be beyond human consciousness to answer. They also do not seem to understand that human beings are not all knowing and all powerful and we are not owed any explanations from Nature at all. Most seem to enjoy getting lost in a Rorschach maze for their entire lives, forever looking up at the sky for aliens, UFOs, angels, Jesus, Superman, Barney the Dinosaur or the imagined result of a billions of years old Big Bang. None seem interested in considering that all they are looking up at are more than likely just the result of ionized gases. In other words, a whole lot of proverbial "hot air". These minds overlook the most obvious electrical atmospheric explanation. Arcing Natural lightning is a huge clue that we exist in an environment that might best be described as electrochemical, but I digress.

In the video embedded below, the Earth is being represented by a marble. And these guys needed seven miles of space to use to emulate the Solar System to scale.


"The Sun was a metaphor for God, around Whom all else revolves."

"Kepler heard their reverberations, studying, besides theology, Greek and Latin, music and mathematics. In the geometry of Euclid he thought he glimpsed an image of perfection and cosmic glory. He was later to write: ‘Geometry existed before the Creation. It is co-eternal with the mind of God . . . Geometry provided God with a model for the Creation . . . Geometry is God Himself.’

Source: COSMOS by Carl Sagan*


Solar System Defined:

(It once meant the whole Universe was centered on the Earth’s Divine Sun.)

Solar:
“mid-15c., "pertaining to the sun," from Latin solaris "of the sun," from sol "sun" (from PIE root *sawel- "the sun"). Meaning "living room on an upper story" is from Old English, from Latin solarium (see solarium). Old English had sunlic "solar." Astrological sense from 1620s. Meaning "operated by means of the sun" is from 1740; solar power is attested from 1915, solar cell from 1955, solar panel from 1964. Solar system is attested from c. 1704; solar wind is from 1958. Solar plexus (1771) "complex of nerves in the pit of the stomach," apparently so called from its central position in the body (see plexus)”

System:

"1610s, "the whole creation, the universe," from Late Latin systema "an arrangement, system," from Greek systema "organized whole, a whole compounded of parts," from stem of synistanai "to place together, organize, form in order," from syn- "together" (see syn-) + root of histanai "cause to stand," from PIE root *sta- "to stand, make or be firm." Meaning "set of correlated principles, facts, ideas, etc." first recorded 1630s. Meaning "animal body as an organized whole, sum of the vital processes in an organism" is recorded from 1680s; hence figurative phrase to get (something) out of one's system (1900). Computer sense of "group of related programs" is recorded from 1963. All systems go (1962) is from U.S. space program. The system"prevailing social order" is from 1806."

source: https://www.etymonline.com/word/solar  •   system | Origin and meaning of system by Online Etymology Dictionary


"On a dry lakebed in Nevada, a group of friends build the first scale model of the solar system with complete planetary orbits: a true illustration of our place in the universe. A film by Wylie Overstreet and Alex Gorosh."

To Scale: The Solar System video and quote source: To Scale:

These people did not bother to model the effect of the Sun as the amazing light source it is supposed to be.

The planets are represented with light bulbs.

If you draw the solar system to scale on a sheet of paper the planets would be microscopic.

Please notice how these guys fail to really accurately model the solar system as they avoid attempting to show how the Sun would illuminate the planets and moons and all the other flying rocks that we are supposed to believe orbit the fiery nuclear furnace-star we call the Sun. They do not even bother to show how the Earth's Moon would be correctly illuminated.

I know there will be many more people who simply refuse to accept this basic criticism assuming there must be some other explanation and there must be some kind of  human error on my part. One might assume that a computer simulation an accurate model of reality and that there is no way "they could fake it" for over 50 years without anyone noticing. These same people also happen to buy into the historical idea that people spent centuries believing God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th, and never noticed it for the unverifiable fairytale most people who have faith in NASA's videotaped feats take Biblical based religion for. People really do spend lifetimes believing things they should not. That religion was supported with sermons from the pulpit and painted art and iconography and blessed and heroic, sainted martyrs. Today the pictures are moving, and have sound, the pulpit is the News anchor desk and the priest has been replaced with News journalist. The sainted martyrs are the astronauts who might have died during the development of a sacred space program none of us regular folk will ever get to wait on line to  to interact with in any real way. Over 50 years later and none of us can go into the magical Disney sold place we all call "outer space". Huge space rockets are necessary Cold War artifacts. They represent hope of space colonization to a promised land that will never happen and the eternal threat of world wide nuclear devastation that also will never happen as both are long standing hoaxes of the governmentally enforced variety. There are many other problems with space travel. If you have questions, see the article index for more. 

Please consider how much smaller than an atom's imagined orbiting electron, even the largest man made rocket would be in the context of this model.

Solar+system+to+scale.jpg

image source: To Scale:

The Solar System To Scale: A Whole Lot of Empty & Vacuous Space

God would be unable to see his creation without aid of Divine microscope. The basic heliocentric model itself is absurd. There was never any real explanation as to how falling apples are like the rising and setting Moon. Sir Isaac Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, and all the rest, were superstitious men who were mystically minded and who were not scientists in any real sense of the term. The work of these men is better described as occult musing backed with nonsensical mathematics.

An empty vacuum of space is supposed to contain microscopic sized bits of dust that are imagined to simply flitter and float about a Universe filled with what is best desorbed as nothing. Einstein attempts to save heliocentric face with the absurd concept that space itself can be curved. Space is a concept and nothing more, to say it can be curved is like saying you can eat the word apple itself.

It's only a model.

The Geocentric model makes the most sense. This is the model that best represents the world we experience and witness.

"As an indication of exactly how good the Ptolemaic model is, modern planetariums are built using gears and motors that essentially reproduce the Ptolemaic model for the appearance of the sky as viewed from a stationary Earth. In the planetarium projector, motors and gears provide uniform motion of the heavenly bodies. One motor moves the planet projector around in a big circle, which in this case is the deferent, and another gear or motor takes the place of the epicycle."

source: The Ptolemaic Model

Like Oz and Wonderland, The Solar System is an imaginary place.

scalemodelSS+(0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: A Sense of Scale

Moon.jpg

image source: How to Photograph the Moon • “moon” captured by Paul Simpson.

The Moon glows.

It is so bright a waning or waxing sliver of it is visible during sunlit daylight sky. It is so bright a full moon casts shadows at night. Just go out and observe it for yourself by eye. Photographs and video and film of the Moon that make it look like a big round rock with craters are filtered or otherwise photo-adjusted to look like that. I am not saying such features are not visible, I am saying that the Moon we see in real life is better described as glowing. If it were a place we could go to, if it is a physical object then it glows somewhat like a light bulb filament. So if it is some kind of big chunk of rock, it is a glowing and unearthly one, which might be "radioactive" in some way. This is all speculation and the Moon more than likely will forever remain a metaphysical mystery. All we can really do is describe what we see and what we individually deem to be logical and demonstrable. We can't demonstrate Newton's explanation for the rising and setting Moon. His concept also defies demonstrable ballistics and logic.

Of course, what one thinks something looks like does not logically make it so.

The power of Earth's gravitational pull is supposed to be so great as to hold the radioactive like Moon in seeming near endless orbit.

Tiny little rockets would need to fight Earth's gravitational pull for a good portion of imagined journey to glowing Moon.

Apples fall with accelerated velocity towards the center of the Earth. The Moon rises and sets. The two motions are nothing alike.

ifthemoonwere1pixel+(0.00.00.00).jpg
static1.squarespace.jpg

image source: Pop Science Presents Spaced Out Science Fiction As Scientific Fact ...

Please consider how sub-atomically small we are relative to it all.

The Earth is a marble in a seven mile wide solar system model. Consider how much smaller even the largest artificial construct would be. Consider too how far away the Moon would really be relative to even Saturn V rocket size, and how for most of the voyage the Lunar bound spacecraft would be subjected to Earth's gravitational pull. A near endless supply of fuel would seem to be needed, supposing rockets would work in such an environment, which is probably not a wise thing to do in the first place.


Astronomy & Astrology: Twin Imaginative Mental Projections

These are the Twin Towers of the official religion of Babel, used for centuries as mythological gruel for the masses and even the university indoctrinated.

Preface: The sky has been used as a rorschach test for centuries to act as endless Platonic Shadow distraction for both the educated and not so educated minds.

The heliocentric based modern patchwork of cosmology is a far cry from the Sun centered Universe of Sir Isaac Newton. If the heliocentric model were as elegant as advertised, it would not be held together with such obvious ad hoc patchwork. We would not have ever have had need to hear about the work of people like Einstein and all the rest and the Sun centered solar system model of a Universe of fixed stars and no galaxies would still be the one most people accepted as an accurate representation of reality. It seems to me that a lot of us simply overlook the obvious ad hoc, and visibly illogical patched nature of modern cosmology. Consider the fact that string theory, black holes, gravity waves, dark energy, dark matter, multiverses, mandala effects and whatever other tabloid like speculative fantasy Discovery Channel sells as science, one wishes to make reference to, are not theories that actually model the real world we witness and experience and instead make liberal use of fallacious mathematical equation, like magic alchemical spell, to claim the most absurd ideas are valid and logically founded speculation. Nothing can be further form the truth and this can be demonstrated. I can't help but notice how so many of our fellow adult human beings simply refuse to see what is obvious. There is no reason to buy into any of the mainstream "space science" and to think the world spins or orbits the Sun. There is every logical reason to accept what our senses tell us and realize all the evidence and all the so-called theories of men like Newton, show us that the world is not best described as the mainstream university and international space station blinded human mind thinks it is, not at all. There is a good reason why modern space science or cosmology is such a mess and that is because it is not based on anything real. It is obviously a patchwork of conflicting ideas. Einstein's own work is contradictory and confused and not what we are sold it is. It is very flawed and his General Relativity thought experiments are shown to be wrong with a simple compass, for example. Einstein is just a superstitious, religious propagandist like the rest. We are sold a version of science backed not with any real experiment and not backed with any logically applied math. Instead we have obvious Hollywood studio fakery on international banking backed scale and we have obviously flawed mathematical formula to look to as evidence that modern astrophysics is literally a religious artifact of government.

(See the article index for more, if curious as to why I make the statements I do.)

The Etymology of the word "Astronomy"

"In English, it is earlier than astrology and originally included the senses now distributed over both words; the gradual differentiation happened 16c.-17c. In Latin and later Greek, astronomia tended to be more scientific than astrologia."

source: astronomy | Origin and meaning of astronomy by Online Etymology ...

*The Word COSMOS means Order

“cosmos (n.) c. 1200 (but not popular until 1848, as a translation of Humboldt's Kosmos), from Latinized form of Greek kosmos "order, good order, orderly arrangement," a word with several main senses rooted in those notions: The verb kosmein meant generally "to dispose, prepare," but especially "to order and arrange (troops for battle), to set (an army) in array;" also "to establish (a government or regime);" "to deck, adorn, equip, dress" (especially of women). Thus kosmos had an important secondary sense of "ornaments of a woman's dress, decoration" (compare kosmokomes "dressing the hair") as well as "the universe, the world." Pythagoras is said to have been the first to apply this word to "the universe," perhaps originally meaning "the starry firmament," but later it was extended to the whole physical world, including the earth. For specific reference to "the world of people," the classical phrase was he oikoumene (ge) "the inhabited (earth)." Septuagint uses both kosmos and oikoumene. Kosmos also was used in Christian religious writing with a sense of "worldly life, this world (as opposed to the afterlife)," but the more frequent word for this was aion, literally "lifetime, age.” ”

source: https://www.etymonline.com/word/cosmos


Orbits are a mental mirage.

"The International Space Station travels in orbit around Earth at a speed of roughly 17,150 miles per hour (that's about 5 miles per second!). This means that the Space Station orbits Earth (and sees a sunrise) once every 92 minutes!"

source: How fast does the Space Station travel? | Cool Cosmos

The Earth's gravity is thought to be at some 90% strength where the International Space Station is imagined to orbit. The link below is to a calculator you can use to see for yourself that the ISS would fall towards Earth's center. By the time it's forward motion of some 5 miles a second, a fixed or constant ballistic based motion, has allowed it to cover a distance of some 1000 miles it would have fallen over 100 miles towards the center of the Earth. At 5 miles a second it would take 200 seconds for the imagined ISS to cover the distance of 1000 miles. You can use the calculator link below. Centrifuge type effects are not part of Sir Isaac Newton's reasoning, and he does admit his idea only exists as mathematical fiction as he himself has no hypothesis to put forth to explain how the falling apple is like the rising and setting Moon. Do the experiment, drop the apple and watch the rising and setting Moon and consider if one is really like the other. Newton did no real experiment, his was a fallaciously reasoned thought experiment that contradicts obvious demonstrable natural physical principles in favor of absurd mathematical modeling that represents nothing real at all.

see: Free fall (distance and velocity) Calculator - High accuracy calculation

Newton+Wrong-1.gif

Next up: Demonstrating Newton Wrong!

The illustration above and demonstrable ballistics physics show the fallacy of Newtonian Orbital musings for what they are.

 

Newton Was Wrong: Orbits Do Not Exist

Demonstrable ballistic physics shows why Orbits are impossible.

Gravitational pull is always towards the center of the Earth and is an accelerated process. The imagined fixed velocity of imagined Newtonian cannonball and the hand waved magical (only) somewhat fixed velocity of equally imagined orbiting space station are not accelerated processes and are demonstrably independent motions from the effect of gravitation's accelerated velocity, towards Earth's center. A bullet dropped from gun barrel height strikes the Earth's surface at the same time as if it were fired. The vertical and horizontal motions are demonstrably independent of each other. An object cannot magically fall around the Earth and when you look at this claim to scale you see why Newton's imagined cannonball and the ISS can only fall after traveling but a short distance. Even at some 17,100 mph, the imagined ISS or imagined cannonball could only fall after traveling but a short relative distance, (see animated gif above) around Earth's much larger circumference.

AA+Morris+The+Proper+Gander_Newton+Wrong.gif

All the supposed "Outer Space" footage in the video clip below is nothing but (obvious) Hollywood Film and CGI style fakery and visual illusion and nothing more.

Please notice all the double talk and nonsense. Weight is the apparent pull or push towards Earth's center, with accelerated effect, if dropped. Objects and people cannot fall around the Earth. The Moon rises and sets, just like the Sun does, for example, and neither are like the proverbial falling apple. Sir Isaac Newton's musings are nonsense.

 

What Is Weightlessness?  source: The Royal Institution

Newton's Flaw

There is no real experiment that shows that there is any reason to take this cartoon and childish nonsense seriously despite all the peer reviewed parroting of university and Governmental promoted religious propaganda advertising myth to the contrary. There is no real underlying science here. Gravity would pull the toy rocket, which is not to scale, to the ground. There is a good reason why the adherents of this unconscious faith tend to avoid illustrating their beliefs to scale. That would be the obvious scientific thing to do, but most fail to notice this fact.

Newton+Wrong.gif

Orbits are Nonsense: The Solar System Model Fails – The Earth is Not Like the Falling Aple

Please keep in mind, Newton is comparing the falling apple to the rising and setting Moon, which rises and sets like the Sun does.

By extension, Sir Isaac was attempting to explain not only how the Moon orbited the Earth, but also how the Earth went around the Sun.

Demonstrable Ballistic Physics Proves Newton's Orbital Musings Wrong

The bullet takes the same amount of time to strike the ground whether just dropped or fired from gun barrel height.

Newton Wrong.jpg

"The vertical force acts perpendicular to the horizontal motion and will not affect it since perpendicular components of motion are independent of each other. Thus, the projectile travels with a constant horizontal velocity and a downward vertical acceleration."

image and quote source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/Characteristics-of-a-Projectile-s-Trajectory

 

Sir Isaac Newton says: “We said, in a mathematical way, to avoid all questions about nature or quality of this force..."

Gravitational acceleration is towards Earth's center. This motion is independent of any apparent momentum or inertial based horizontal motion. In the case of an imaged object in orbit traveling some 17.170 mph, that object would still be subjected to the effect we term "gravity" and would be pulled with accelerated effect towards Earth's center. Newton himself (wisely) admits that there is no hypothesis for his imagined orbital explanation that compares the falling apple to the rising and setting Moon. One can read the words of this supposed "genius" for oneself over at archive.org. The next article will get into all the details.

 

Newtonian Orbital Mechanics = Cartoon Thought Balloon Physics

Free falling in outer space - Matt J. Carlson  source: TED-Ed

Do you see the problem with the explanation offered in the cartoon video above?

"Up and down" really means (in this context) towards and away from Earth's center. Gravity's accelerated effect is always towards Earth's center. The International Space programs are all fake.

 

The Falling Apple Proves Newton Wrong

Orbits are a mental mirage.

"The International Space Station travels in orbit around Earth at a speed of roughly 17,150 miles per hour (that's about 5 miles per second!). This means that the Space Station orbits Earth (and sees a sunrise) once every 92 minutes!"

source: How fast does the Space Station travel? | Cool Cosmos

Newton+Wrong-1.gif

Orbits are a mental mirage.

The Earth's gravity is thought to be at some 90% strength where the International Space Station is imagined to orbit. The link below is to a calculator you can use to see for yourself that the ISS would fall towards Earth's center. By the time it's forward motion of some 5 miles a second, a fixed or constant ballistic based motion, has allowed it to cover a distance of some 1000 miles it would have fallen over 100 miles towards the center of the Earth. At 5 miles a second it would take 200 seconds for the imagined ISS to cover the distance of 1000 miles. You can use the calculator link below. Centrifuge type effects are not part of Sir Isaac Newton's reasoning, and he does admit his idea only exists as mathematical fiction as he himself has no hypothesis to put forth to explain how the falling apple is like the rising and setting Moon. Do the experiment, drop the apple and watch the rising and setting Moon and consider if one is really like the other. Newton did no real experiment, his was a fallaciously reasoned thought experiment that contradicts obvious demonstrable natural physical principles in favor of absurd mathematical modeling that represents nothing real at all.

see: Free fall (distance and velocity) Calculator - High accuracy calculation

(For comparison the Earth's circumference is estimated to be some 24,900 miles.)

 

The Orbital Problem:

The Illogic of Objects Falling Around The Earth or The Earth Falling Around The Sun Should Be Obvious
Yet we have been indoctrinated by cult thinking to truly believe the absurd makes sense.

"So what launch speed does a satellite need in order to orbit the earth? The answer emerges from a basic fact about the curvature of the earth. For every 8000 meters measured along the horizon of the earth, the earth's surface curves downward by approximately 5 meters. So if you were to look out horizontally along the horizon of the Earth for 8000 meters, you would observe that the Earth curves downwards below this straight-line path a distance of 5 meters. For a projectile to orbit the earth, it must travel horizontally a distance of 8000 meters for every 5 meters of vertical fall. It so happens that the vertical distance that a horizontally launched projectile would fall in its first second is approximately 5 meters (0.5*g*t2). For this reason, a projectile launched horizontally with a speed of about 8000 m/s will be capable of orbiting the earth in a circular path. This assumes that it is launched above the surface of the earth and encounters negligible atmospheric drag. As the projectile travels tangentially a distance of 8000 meters in 1 second, it will drop approximately 5 meters towards the earth. Yet, the projectile will remain the same distance above the earth due to the fact that the earth curves at the same rate that the projectile falls. If shot with a speed greater than 8000 m/s, it would orbit the earth in an elliptical path."

source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circles/Lesson-4/Circular-Motion-Principles-for-Satellites

Spaced Out Programming

Please notice how in the above description the imagined projectile impossibly only and always drops 5 meters a second. This is obviously true only for the first second of time. There is a mental bait and switch that allows the fundamentalist to cling to absurd religious faith in Newtonian orbital nonsense. The imagined international outer space program is key ego boosting myth of (post) modern times.

After 1 second: 5 meters • After 2 seconds: 20 meters • After 3 seconds: 45 meters

The 1:4:9 2001: Space Odyssey Mnemonic
Gravity’s accelerated effect is in proportion to 1:4:9. The first second the distance fallen is 5 meters.
After two seconds this distance is now a total of 20 meters, the projectile would have gained an additional velocity of 15 meters as a result of gravity’s accelerated effect. After the third second the total distance is now 45 meters. The projectile now has gained an additional 25 meters per second of velocity. The falling projectile only covers a distance of 5 meters after the first second.

The above description also ignores demonstrable ballistic physics which shows us that the accelerated pull of gravitational effect is an independent motion from the forward fixed velocity momentum of any real world projectile. Imagined projectiles can fly like Superman, of course.

Free fall (distance and velocity) Calculator - High accuracy calculation

Newton Wrong.jpg

image source: Logarithmic spiral - Wikipedia

Circular Reasoning (Pun Intended) is the Order of the Day:

Please note the self applied apologetics that most of us unconsciously engage in as we have been conditioned to do. The obvious is overlooked in favor of the nonsensical and fantastic, which most minds find to be "inspiring", and this "inspiration" would seem to become a very real addiction to mentally poisonous speculative nonsense long sold as fact.

"In an inertial frame, if there really were two equal-but-opposite forces on the satellite as von Braun drew them, then the total force on it would be zero.  So it wouldn't accelerate; it would move in a straight line with constant speed.  Since the orbiting satellite doesn't move in a straight line, neither von Braun's picture nor his explanation can be right."

"In the 1960s, Wernher von Braun put together a series of articles about space flight, some of which were published in Popular Science Monthly.  Eventually they were collected and made into the book Space Frontier, (1st ed., Holt, Rinehart and Winston).  It's a very readable book, and talks about how rockets work, and flight and safety in space.  In one of the articles, von Braun explains why a satellite is able to stay up while in Earth orbit. He begins the article by asking what would happen if we could throw an object horizontally, but at faster and faster speeds, such as in the picture shown here.  "Eventually", he writes, "the curvature of the downward-bent trajectory would become equal to the curvature of the earth."  This is almost well and good.  (It's not quite right to say that the curvatures of the orbit and Earth's surface are the same, even for circular motion, but this is a minor error compared with what comes next.)  The important point is that as the bullet moves faster and faster, a magical speed is reached where the curved Earth drops away from the bullet precisely as fast as the bullet falls to the ground; added to which, the direction of "down" keeps changing.  As a result, the bullet never gets any closer to the ground—it's in orbit.  This is actually a marvellous special feature of an inverse square force like gravity; it would not be guaranteed to happen if gravity were not inverse square.  In general, orbits are ellipses, and one such is drawn on the left.  A picture just like this was originally included by Sir Isaac Newton in his Principia of 1687.  After this fine start, von Braun then proceeds to muddy the water.  He says that as the bullet is shot at ever faster speeds, "its trajectory will be less deflected because the centrifugal force is increased by its higher speed, and more effectively counteracts the Earth's gravitational pull."  At this point physicists baulk.  Centrifugal force?  What has that got to do with satellite motion? Next, von Braun draws a picture of a satellite in Earth orbit.  Acting on the satellite are two forces: gravity, pulling the satellite toward Earth, and this centrifugal force, pushing the satellite away.  He writes "A circular orbit occurs whenever a small mass, travelling through the gravitational field of a big one, happens to have a speed at which the centrifugal force is precisely strong enough to balance the large body's gravitational pull."  And later, "If the balance between gravitational and centrifugal force is not perfect, [...] the small body will describe an elliptical path around the large one."

"What would Newton say?  He too would draw the forces acting on the satellite, and would then proceed to apply his "force = mass × acceleration"; but first, he'd want to choose an "inertial frame" within which to do this, since his laws only work in inertial frames.  An inertial frame is one in which, if we throw a ball, it moves away from us with constant velocity (i.e. constant speed in a straight line). Since this doesn't quite happen on Earth, the frame Newton would choose would be something more all-encompassing, outside of Earth.  One good approximation would be the frame of the Solar System, within which the Sun is at rest and Earth revolves fairly accurately in a circle around it, once a year.  An inertial frame like this is presumably what von Braun is using, because anything noninertial won't tie in too well with his picture of Earth plus satellite. In an inertial frame, if there really were two equal-but-opposite forces on the satellite as von Braun drew them, then the total force on it would be zero.  So it wouldn't accelerate; it would move in a straight line with constant speed.  Since the orbiting satellite doesn't move in a straight line, neither von Braun's picture nor his explanation can be right."

source: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Centrifugal/centri.html

 

Sir Isaac Newton says: "...which we would not be understood to determine by any hypothesis..."

“We said, in a mathematical way, to avoid all questions about nature or quality of this forcewhich we would not be understood to determine by any hypothesis; and therefore call it by the general name of a centripetal force, as it is a force which is directed towards some centre; and as it regards more particularly a body in that centre…”

Sir Isaac Newton

source: Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive

The centripetal force to which Sir Isaac Newton refers is gravity's accelerated pull. The centripetal force to which Newton refers is the accelerated effect of gravitation. This cannot be balanced with the fixed velocity of an imaged projectile, but an equal sign works magic on most minds. Mathematical equation can be used to model gibberish as easily as verbal language can.

Read Newton for yourself:

Newton+Wrong-1 (0.00.00.00).jpg

source link: Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive

The word "hypothesis" as Sir Isaac would have meant it:

"hypothesis (n.) 1590s, "a particular statement;" 1650s, "a proposition, assumed and taken for granted, used as a premise," from Middle French hypothese and directly from Late Latin hypothesis, from Greek hypothesis "base, groundwork, foundation," hence in extended use "basis of an argument, supposition," literally "a placing under," from hypo- "under" (see hypo-) + thesis "a placing, proposition" (from reduplicated form of PIE root *dhe- "to set, put"). A term in logic; narrower scientific sense is from 1640s."

source: hypothesis | Origin and meaning of hypothesis by Online Etymology ...

Heliocentric Blinded Mental Wizardry: Mathematically Confusing Models with Reality

Sir Isaac Newton, like Kepler and all the rest that have evolved from this early Sun obsessed proverbial Apple seed are mathematical magicians who confuse the real world with one of their own imaginings and this rorschach projected reality occults the true Natural World from view. The university and governmentally imposed educational system ends up crafting generations of minds that view the Natural World through allegorical Disney - Day Glow lava lamp like glasses. These minds simply filter out the obvious and Natural and demonstrable reality in favor of imaginative storytelling that  feeds into their ego identity based images of themselves. Augmented reality is nothing new. Humanity never needed virtual 3d world goggles to end up mentally trapped in imaginative Oz like Disney Worlds with little to no relation to reality. Religious thinking is contagious and takes many forms. Modern cosmology is superstitious nonsense backed up with equal helpings of peer pressure reviewed fallacious math.

The Sun obsessed faith of heliocentric minds has mutated into a multiverse of ad hoc cartoonish silliness sold as "science" to a mass public that can't tell "a green field from a cold steel rail".


The Falling Apple is Not Like The Observable Rising and Setting Moon or Sun

Gravity's accelerated effect pulls objects towards the center of the Earth. The Moon and Sun rise and set. The Solar System model is not real it is an idea and a God like point of view that does not really exist.

Orbits are not real. Orbits do not exist. The celestial phenomena rise and set. Rocks and apples can drop and roll, what they cannot do is fly around in magical halo like circles.

Orbital Hoax.jpg

Circular Reasoned Fallacy is Sold as Established Settled Science

The Solar System model is absurd. The Big Bang is another artifact that has no relation to reality. All of these are examples of imaginative ad hoc artifacts of a very real unconscious religion.

source: EXPOSING CORRUPT SCIENCE - Page 158 - Google Books Result

The Ptolemaic Model Best Describes The World We Witness & Experience

The celestial lights appear to circle the Earth. These lights are not like apples and rocks that fall towards Earth's center. It is as simple as that. All the hype about the ptolemaic model being complicated is nothing but advertising myth. The Ptolemaic model is the one that works best.

"Ptolemy's major contribution, however, was that his model could so accurately explain the motions of heavenly bodies, it became the model for understanding the ... As an indication of exactly how good the Ptolemaic model is, modern planetariums are built using gears and motors that essentially reproduce the Ptolemaic ..."

source: The Ptolemaic Model

 
AA Morris Rainbow.jpg

Big "G" little "g' and all the hot bull gas in between.

So much more to come. The next articles will further expose the Newtonian and Royal Society promoted "scientific" propaganda for the intellectually dishonest nonsense it is. Measuring gravity with anything but falling objects is not real science. Pendulum based experiments are proof of nothing but a long standing hoax. Pendulums make for terrible measuring instruments. The Cavendish Experiment and so many other foundational "proofs" are garbage, to be blunt about it.



A Holiday Post Script: IT'S ABOUT TIME


 

The Sun is the Primary Natural Source of Artificial Time

A Christmas Gander at Yuletide Propaganda

The time of the season is important when one is farming. Saturn the God of the Harvest is apt allegory. Saturn is the true God of Bible and Heliocentric based faith. In other words, the old white man with the long white beard is an image of the Lord of the Manor.

It's a good idea to get the human resource flock to imagine that the Creator of All looks like the guys running the world-wide snake oil pyramid scheme, con-job show.

Heliocentric theory is just another form of Sun centered idolatry. It is just another religious faith and mind maze. Heliocentric beliefs derive from astrology and alchemy. In other words Heliocentric theory and all that evolved from this source, are the result of the same speculative musings that all religions are. Humanity is still organized into collective groupings based on superstitions socially reinforced on National and even International scale. It's all about crafting the precious golden ego egg of some kind of identity product for the human resource to emulate.

The allegorical old end of the year roman archetype "Saturn" represents the waning Sun that becomes "reborn" after Winter Solstice, from the point of view of the North Hemisphere, of course. Our World wide, electronically, sea based and passenger jet delivered culture is one that has been based on looking up at the sky and Sun for centuries. In doing so we end up overlooking the obvious, which is right under our noses. The use of the heavens as world wide navigation guide makes sense and is demonstrable science. Anything else is, or can be, highly misleading speculation that has been long used as source of proverbial snake oil charms and products for seemingly as long as humans have existed. In other words, this would seem to be a perennial or eternal feature of human nature itself. We might just be instinctually inclined to all the obvious absurd and cartoonish behavior we witness. Humanity, all of us, from those in the know at the top to the most ignorant not in the know at the bottom of allegorical social pyramid, would seem to tend to be victims of humanity's demonstrable "monkey see, monkey do" herd like behavior. Peer review is a very real form of Pavlovian conditioning, for example, and this social reinforcement is what allows most human minds to put aside common sense in favor of parroting back peer approved catechism.

AA Morris The Proper Gander V2.jpg

"Christmas is coming, the geese are getting fat. Please put a penny in the old man's hat. If you haven't got a penny, a ha'penny will do If you haven't got a ha'penny, then God bless you!"

source: Christmas Is Coming - Wikipedia  see also: Henny Penny - Wikipedia   •  The Very Proper Gander – Short Stories

"The Sun was a metaphor for God, around Whom all else revolves."

"Kepler heard their reverberations, studying, besides theology, Greek and Latin, music and mathematics. In the geometry of Euclid he thought he glimpsed an image of perfection and cosmic glory. He was later to write: ‘Geometry existed before the Creation. It is co-eternal with the mind of God . . . Geometry provided God with a model for the Creation . . . Geometry is God Himself.’

Source: COSMOS by Carl Sagan

Unionskirche_Idstein_Revelation.jpg

Halo = Sun

christian3.jpg

image source: Halos in Western Art

Lope275 × 281Search by image

"Use of the halo became increasingly formalized among Christian artists. Formalization of symbols is called iconography; a readily recognizable system of ..."

"The halo motif has been used in Western art for thousands of years. A halo, also called a nimbus or aureole, is a circular ring of light surrounding the head of a deity or saint."

source: http://www.lope.ca/halo/

HALO:

"1560s, "ring of light around the sun or moon," from Latin halo (nominative halos), from Greek halos"disk of the sun or moon; ring of light around the sun or moon" (also "disk of a shield"); ""threshing floor; garden," of unknown origin. The sense "threshing floor" (on which oxen trod out a circular path) probably is the original in Greek. The development to "disk" and then to "halo" would be via roundness. Sense of "light around the head of a holy person or deity" first recorded 1640s. As a verb from 1791 (implied in Haloed)."

source: halo | Origin and meaning of halo by Online Etymology Dictionary

The Sun Returns: “It’s About Time”
Seasons are real. Artificial time is not. All we ever witness would seem to be an eternal seasonal round. The Sun oscillates between Northern and Southern hemispheres, between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, as it has been observed to do for at least the last few centuries, or so the story goes.

Saturn The Sun Returns: Saturday Turns into Sunday

"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, a time to reap that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; ... This line and the title phrase "Turn!"

source: Turn! Turn! Turn! - Wikipedia

de-sph2saturno-2.jpg

Myth is poetry and not science. The God Saturn is an allegory.

•SATURNUS•

Can you see Sat turn into Sun?

SAT TURN NUS

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mnemonic for more.

Show don't tell:

The image above is a form of nonverbal communication and nothing more mystical or insightful than that. The content is simply one that would seem to have to do with the seasons in the context of crafting a society, These images are from before the more modern mass produced and industrialized age. These images are from a time when cities were constructed from stone and agriculture would have been on most people's minds, unlike today when we can not only go to a local grocery store that stocks goods from around the world, we can order food and wine and more, all from the comfort of smart screen phone.

We do not normally concern ourselves with the real reason why we mark the passing of the seasons. We do not need to farm our own resources to survive. We tend to live out of touch with this actual reality. Most of us do not slaughter our own game we hunted or livestock we raised on our own land. Most of us need not worry about seasonal harvests and crops failing and all the rest. We mostly only care about the weather because we might become inconvenienced in some way.

Cancer & Capricorn

"The Tropic of Cancer is the circle marking the latitude 23.5 degrees north, where the sun is directly overhead at noon on June 21, the beginning of summer in the northern hemisphere. The Tropic of Capricorn is the circle marking the latitude 23.5 degrees south where the sun is directly overhead at noon on December 21, the beginning of winter in the northern hemisphere."

source: What is the significance of the Tropic of Cancer, Tropic of Capricorn ...


Carl Sagan: Snake Oil Con Man

Mythology is not science, it is poetry. Modern propagandists, like their old time counterparts, make liberal use of imaginative and fantastic bullshit sold as reality. The faithful can get lost in numbers, and numerology and symbolic significances and all sorts of mental mazes. People spend their lives lost in an imagined “infinite” number of ideas that have wandered far away from reality, with or without mathematical magic support. Priestly peer reviewed social reinforcement is what allows the highest educated minds to buy into the silliest ideas without blinking or thinking. Degrees and peer approval, and Pavlovian paychecks, reinforce cartoon reasoned ideas. The “scientifically” inclined are very real and very unconscious, indoctrinated members of a religion with very little to no basis in reality. It is a form of mass insanity.

The ad hoc pyramid of multiverse astrophysical cosmology sold as some kind of reality today, is the result of a Sun obsessed alchemical, centuries old, mind virus.

CARL SAGAN on How Hindu Culture is basis for modern Cosmic theories  source: rahul raj

Don't get me wrong, myths can contain insights. But what they cannot do is act like science. Myths are not demonstrable Natural principles. They are a form of language.


It’s All About The Circuit of The Sun: Ours is A Sun Obsessed World Wide Culture

asia copy.jpg

Church, Chakra, Circle

"Old English cirice, circe "place of assemblage set aside for Christian worship; the body of Christian believers, Christians collectively; ecclesiastical authority or power," from Proto-Germanic *kirika(source also of Old Saxon kirika, Old Norse kirkja, Old Frisian zerke, Middle Dutch kerke, Dutch kerk, Old High German kirihha, German Kirche)."

source: church | Origin and meaning of church by Online Etymology Dictionary  •  chakra | Origin and meaning of chakra by Online Etymology Dictionary

Sun: 777

"The Seven Churches of Revelation, also known as The Seven Churches of the Apocalypse and The Seven Churches of Asia, are seven major churches of Early Christianity, as mentioned in the New Testament Book of Revelation. "Churches" in this context refers to the community or local congregations of Christians living in each city, and not merely to the building or buildings in which they gathered for worship.

source: Seven churches of Asia - Wikipedia  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chakra

The Music of The Seven Spheres

"A diatonic scale is any seven-note scale constructed sequentially using only whole tones and half tones, repeating at the octave, having a tonal center, and comprising only one tritone interval between any twoscale members, which ensures that the half tone intervals are as far apart as possible. In Westernmusic, there are ..."

source: Heptatonic scale - Wikipedia

Spreading Christ Through Song

"During the colonial period, Franciscan, Dominican, Augustinian, Jesuit, and other Roman Catholic missionaries found European sacred music a valuable means of teaching the indigenous population the tenets and customs of Christianity. Many pre-Conquest indigenous musical practices were easily transferred to Roman ..."

source: The Concise Garland Encyclopedia of World Music

"The Scholarly Record Pre-Encounter Music The Historical Record Música Regional: The Mestizo Son Widespread Genres Music and Public Policy Popular Music Further ... Augustinian, Jesuit, and other Roman Catholic missionaries found European sacred music a valuable means of teaching the indigenous population the..."

source: The Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South America, Mexico, ...

"I have argued that music has been instrumental in enabling missionaries to impart knowledge to Yolngu, while Yolngu have been agents in motivating and mobilizing others to be involved in the spread of Christianity through song. As they have learned to compose Christian musics, they have been able to reorient complex ..."

source: The Oxford Handbook of Music and World Christianities

Merry Mnemonic Memories:
Music and Time

Seven Days and Seven Individual Notes of The Octave, 12 Moons or Months and the 12 Notes of the Chromatic Scale

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(music)#Western_Church  •  Chromatic scale - Wikipedia

Mnemonic - Wikipedia  • Mnemonic major system - Wikipedia  •  List of mnemonics - Wikipedia 

"A mnemonic is a way for people to remember things more easily. For example the treble clef lines on a music staff are for the notes E G B D and F. Music students are taught to remember this with a mnemonic - Every Good Boy Does Fine. The first known mnemonics were used by the Ancient Greeks. Cicero said the poet ..."

source:  Mnemonic - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


'TWAS THE NIGHT BEFORE X MAS...

PX

“The word "Christ" and its compounds, including "Christmas", have been abbreviated in English for at least the past 1,000 years, long before the modern "Xmas" was commonly used. "Christ" was often written as "Xρ" or "Xt"; there are references in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as far back as 1021. This X and P arose as the uppercase forms of the Greek letters χ (Ch) and ρ (R) used in ancient abbreviations for Χριστος (Greek for "Christ").[1] The labarum, an amalgamation of the two Greek letters rendered as ☧,[note 1] is a symbol often used to represent Christ in Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox Christian Churches.”

source: Xmas - Wikipedia

AA Morris The Proper Gander V2 SATURN ROCKET HOAX.jpg

FIN