Mature Content Wanring: Some Mature Imagery Ahead
Social engineering in the digital age of instant commerce explored.
Individual Results May Vary: Case Study - YouTube's Gigi Gorgeous
I think it possible the before male person is not the same person as the after the hormone therapy and sex change surgery female person. I am very skeptical of the results we see here. Considering this is highly edited video footage strung together to create the impression of a narrative, and this is all the evidence we have to examine, I would suggest my opinion is the rationale one.
I have a feeling quite a few of the celebrities promoted as transgender are not transgender at all and are simply the natural gender they appear to be. Presenting a real woman as a "former man" is quite a mind trip. Cognitive dissonance at it's finest.
I do not know "Gigi" but I would wager this is what it seems to be, official YouTube social agenda, propaganda. If this person really transitioned from a male into a female as we are shown then good for him! He really pulled it off and looks like a she as far as I can tell. (watch both videos) Yet I would think that most people will not be able to make such a wonderful transition from one gender state to the next. I'd imagine it would take years of hormone therapy and cosmetic surgery to achieve far less of a result than this remarkable feat, but then again what do I know, I am not a doctor, or am I?
For all we know "Gigi" are just fraternal twins. One a boy and one a girl. Or perhaps just people who simply look alike. When all we have is highly edited video footage as evidence, these ideas represent real possibilities. In fact it's possible that we have three different people here playing the same role. (watch both videos to see what I mean) It doesn't matter if we have the most rare example for the best transition "ever" or we have what seems to be a long standing media hoax, the agenda is the same, this is 21st century marketing.
This Might Just Be 21st Century Social Identity Bait & Switch Advertising
"Angier discovers and subsequently steals Borden's fantastic trick "The Transported Man," where Borden instantly travels between two wardrobes on opposite ends of a stage. Cutter and Olivia groom Root, an out-of-work actor, into a "double" for Angier to mimic his appearance and mannerisms. 'The New Transported Man' is a huge success, but Angier is displeased, as he ends the trick hidden under the stage while Root basks in the applause."
A Claim of One Year of Hormone Therapy and A Some Hospital Footage Does Not a Gender Transition Make:
*Your Results Will More Than Likely Vary
A One Stop Cosmetic Photoshop?
This Is Everything: Gigi Gorgeous - OFFICIAL TRAILER source: Gigi Gorgeous
Self Adhesive Breast Forms Are Easily Obtainable Online. Imagine What a Hollywood makeup expert could do.
The reason not to believe what we see on screens in highly edited form is obvious. Hollywood techniques have always included the art of creating very believable illusions and one of the earliest and easiest forms of film fakery makes use of make up, prosthetics and lighting techniques. Highly edited video product is proof of nothing, more often than not. Photographs have always been manipulated in the darkroom to produce the desired results. Buyer beware, you results may vary and more than likely will
Men Try Breast Forms: Detachable Silicone Breasts! source: Davison Video
Always remember a professional Hollywood production makes liberal use of a myriad of techniques to craft highly believable illusions.
How I would do it:
A pair of fraternal twins (or siblings that resembled each other) pretending to be a person transitioning seamlessly from one gender to another would make for the perfect role model and idol, no? A third final actress to take over the role might be an interesting ending twist. Or I would employ every Hollywood special effect and makeup technique I could to present the best example of this 21st century identity product as I could. Perhaps I would use a combination of all those techniques. Perhaps some plastic surgery is involved. Some men are more feminine than others and some women have more masculine features, I might make use of that as well. There could be some real hormone therapy too. Maybe just some make up and silicone prosthetics is all we need.
In fact the more I think about it the more I think that what we have here is a role played by two people. One a man and the latter one (see video below) a woman. I think it likely the young man in the above video simply had prosthetics applied to make him appear to have transitioned and then the role was taken over by an actress.
There are many ways to craft the advertising illusions we need to sell identity product to the mass public.
Your real medical results will vary of course, but don't think about that at all. This looks like it is going to be big medical business! Investing in this sector might be sound economic (albeit immoral) advise, It's not a good idea to seek permanent body modification solutions to one's individual "problems", but hey "everyone" is going Hollywood cosmetic surgery crazy, so why not?
Think Of All The Money To Be Made From Years of Endless Hormonal Therapy and Surgery!
If I'm Wrong This Is Quite An Achievement That Most Will Not Realize
Whether this is the same person after what seems to be a minimum of fuss or not, the point is you results will vary! This is modern advertising and nothing more. The product being sold is the transgender identity. If you are a dude it is unlikely you will magically be turned into someone who looks like a Hollywood actress/model with what seems to be a minimum of fuss and a minimum of time. Hormone therapies and body altering surgeries are not something to enter into lightly. Needless medical "treatments" like all forms of needless cosmetic surgery are money makers for the medical industry overall and that incentive is obviously driving much of what we see.
Think Bruce Jenner is Jealous?
YouTube Is Government: YouTube Is The 21st Century Weapon of Mass Cultural Detonation
Do not easily believe what you see on screens.
Gigi mentions both 9/11 and Flat Earth, An Advertising Shout Out To Two of YouTubes Biggest "Conspiracy" Communities
REACTING TO MY OLD VIDEOS PART 1! | Gigi Gigi Gorgeous
Maintaing YouTube Media Memes
Edited video of a young man wearing similar make up and the same kind of fake eyelashes as a person that appears to be a woman is not proof of anything.
A Gorgeous Media Figure Emerges:
(She must have a great agent.)
"Gigi Loren Lazzarato (born Gregory Allan Lazzarato on April 20, 1992), better known as Gigi Gorgeous, is a Canadian model, actress, and internet personality. She is noted for publicly coming out as a transgender woman, and maintaining her public image and YouTube channel during and after her transition. Along with being an internet personality, Lazzarato has also appeared on a number of television shows including Access Hollywood, Good Work, and Project Runway: All Stars, along with starring as herself in the popular online reality show The Avenue for three years."
Let Me Get This Straight:
The Guy Who Claimed To Originally Be A Gay Male Transitions To A Woman And Then Comes Out as a Lesbian?
Talk about "transitions" Gigi went from a being a gay dude wearing makeup to becoming a lesbian "hot chick".
God bless Gigi, Gigi has found bliss. Gigi has surfed the gender spectrum from one end to the other.
"2008–13: Beginnings on YouTube and The Avenue: Prior to her transition, Lazzarato was known as Gregory or Greg, and operated a makeup tutorial YouTube channel that was started in 2008. At the time, she identified as a gay male."
"Lazzarato, who had previously identified herself as bisexual, came out as lesbian in a YouTube video on September 14, 2016."
"Lazzarato is a practicing Roman Catholic and describes herself as religious."
"Lazzarato is in a relationship with Natalia Williams, an heiress and member of the Getty family"
"Transition: Lazzarato announced that she was a transgender woman in December 2013. Since then she has undergone electrolysis, tracheal shave, hormone replacement therapy, facial feminization surgery, rhinoplasty, and breast augmentation. She legally had her name changed to Gigi Loren Lazzarato on March 8, 2014. "
"In a September 2015 issue of People Magazine, Lazzarato credited transgender model and performing artist, Amanda Lepore and her mother's death for sparking her transition."
In just two years this person is supposed to have transitioned from one gender to the other, in a perfect manner.
Money Makes This Mad Mad World Go Merry Go Round: This agenda is driven by money not freedom.
"Now, federal law prohibits health insurance companies from discriminating against transgender people, and it bars insurers from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. That makes it possible for more transgender people to purchase private plans. And in states that expanded their Medicaid programs, those with low incomes may get free coverage.
The federal anti-discrimination regulations have yet to be written, but California insurance regulators have said that companies must treat transgender patients the same as other patients. For example, if plans cover hormones for post-menopausal women, they must also cover them for transgender women. Medicare, the program for the elderly and disabled, lifted its ban on covering sex reassignment surgery earlier this year. "
The goal of this conference is to enhance the health and well-being of members of the transgender community by (1) increasing the number of mental health and medical health care providers who feel comfortable and confident providing care for transgender patients; (2) increasing transgender community members’ knowledge, self-efficacy and advocacy skills through transgender centered educational sessions."
Permanent Results That Will Vary
Please note I am not advocating laws banning these procedures or anything like that. I think we should have less laws and more rationale discussions of ideas. An honest airing of individual views is the better way to go. I have nothing against anyone who self identifies as transgender or who goes through these procedures even though I disagree with them. What other adults do to themselves is of little concern to me. The obvious institutional intellectual dishonesty and the propaganda campaign itself, is what interests me. If someone really wants to do something (destructive) to themselves, there's not really much anyone can do to stop them, other than discussing things in an open and honest way. Hormone therapies and unnecessary surgeries do not seem like the correct solution to the problem; you can't simply undo permanent body mutilation.
Pizzagate ain't got nothing on Papa John Money!
"He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of "gender" affect an individual."
"Money made the concept of gender a broader, more inclusive concept than one of masculine/feminine. For him, gender included not only one's status as a man or a woman, but was also a matter of personal recognition, social assignment, or legal determination; not only on the basis of one's genitalia but also on the basis of somatic and behavioral criteria that go beyond genital differences."
This is all about MONEY:
$$$ Dr. John Money $$$
(with special thanks to Fakeologist)
Nothing like a Harvard education and no personal experience as a parent and barely any as a husband.
"He left Pittsburgh and earned his PhD from Harvard University in 1952. He was married briefly in the 1950s but had no children."
(presenting the legendary pervert, a masochistic and pedophilia based psychopathic child psychologist: Dr. John Money)
Get Ready For A Whole Lot of Nonsense That Illogically Self Identifies As Science:
John Money applied his ideas about hermaphrodites to everyone, defining a magical spectrum of baseless division in the process. We don't even know how valid his ideas about hermaphrodites are. This entire field of study reads a lot like so-called space science. This is about creating more of the social constructs known as "identities". Gender identity becomes a way to further define one's self. Of course you are not the choices you make. Identity is a social artifice. It is a lie. Money applies gender to many attributes it need not be associated with and in doing so he attempts to create a whole slew of new identities that we can further sort ourselves into. Sexual behavior is a choice not an identity. You can't control who you are attracted to but who you are attracted to does not define you. That would be like assuming that since you like trees you are one. Do you self identify as a pedestrian when you are walking? Is that your identity?
"John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a psychologist, sexologist and author, specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of "gender" affect an individual. His work has been both celebrated for its innovation and criticized, particularly in regard to his involvement with the discredited sex-reassignment of David Reimer. and his eventual suicide. Money published around 2,000 articles, books, chapters and reviews. His writing has been translated into many languages. Money has received around 65 world-wide honors, awards, and degrees."
"Money suggests that the concept of threshold (Oxford 1988: 115) – the release or inhibition of sexual (or other) behavior – is most useful for sex research as a substitute for any concept of motivation. Moreover, it confers the distinct advantage of having continuity and unity to what would otherwise be a highly disparate and varied field of research. It also allows for the classification of sexual behavior. For Money, the concept of threshold has great value because of the wide spectrum to which it applies. "It allows one to think developmentally or longitudinally, in terms of stages or experiences that are programmed serially, or hierarchically, or cybernetically (i.e. regulated by mutual feedback)." (Oxford 1988: 116)"
Money introduced numerous definitions related to gender in journal articles in the 1950s, many of them as a result of his studies of Hermaphroditism.
Money's definition of gender is based on his understanding of sex differences among human beings. According to Money, the fact that one sex produces ova and the other sex produces sperm is the irreducible criterion of sex difference. However, there are other sex-derivative differences that follow in the wake of this primary dichotomy.
These differences involve the way urine is expelled from the human body and other questions of sexual dimorphism. According to Money's theory, sex-adjunctive differences are typified by the smaller size of females and their problems in moving around while nursing infants. This then makes it more likely that the males do the roaming and hunting.
Sex-arbitrary differences are those that are purely conventional: for example, color selection (baby blue for boys, pink for girls). Some of the latter differences apply to life activities, such as career opportunities for men versus women.
Finally, Money created the now-common term gender role which he differentiated from the concept of the more traditional terminology sex role. This grew out of his studies of hermaphrodites. According to Money, the genitalia and erotic sexual roles were now, by his definition, to be included under the more general term "gender role" including all the non-genital and non-erotic activities that are defined by the conventions of society to apply to males or to females.
In his studies of hermaphrodites, Money found that there are six variables that define sex. While in the average person all six would line up unequivocally as either all "male" or "female", in hermaphrodites any one or more than one of these could be inconsistent with the others, leading to various kinds of anomalies. In his seminal 1955 paper he defined these factors as:
- assigned sex and sex of rearing
- external genital morphology
- internal reproductive structures
- hormonal and secondary sex characteristics
- gonadal sex
- chromosomal sex
"Patients showing various combinations and permutations of these six sexual variables may be appraised with respect to a seventh variable:
7. Gender role and orientation as male or female, established while growing up."
He then defined gender role as
"all those things that a person says or does to disclose himself or herself as having the status of boy or man, girl or woman, respectively. It includes, but is not restricted to sexuality in the sense of eroticism. Gender role is appraised in relation to the following: general mannerisms, deportment and demeanor; play preferences and recreational interests; spontaneous topics of talk in unprompted conversation and casual comment; content of dreams, daydreams and fantasies; replies to oblique inquiries and projective tests; evidence of erotic practices, and, finally, the person's own replies to direct inquiry."
Money made the concept of gender a broader, more inclusive concept than one of masculine/feminine.
For him, gender included not only one's status as a man or a woman, but was also a matter of personal recognition, social assignment, or legal determination; not only on the basis of one's genitalia but also on the basis of somatic and behavioral criteria that go beyond genital differences.
In 1972, Money presented his theories in Man & Woman, Boy & Girl, a college-level, mainstream textbook. The book featured David Reimer (see below) as an example of gender reassignment."
Legendary Acts of Perversion:
"In 2000, David and his twin brother (Brian) alleged that Money forced the twins to rehearse sexual acts involving "thrusting movements", with David playing the bottom role. He said as a child, Money forced him go "down on all fours" with his brother, Brian Reimer, "up behind his butt" with "his crotch against" his "buttocks", and that Money forced David to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections". On at "least one occasion", Money reportedly took photographs of the two children doing these activities. Money's rationale for these various treatments was his belief that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play'" was important for a "healthy adult gender identity". "
Money is one messed up dude, whether all the stories are true or not, his published work is perverted nonsense and not science.
A Legally Binding Post Script:
I believe in less governmental authority not more. I think adults are free to enter into whatever adult relationships they like, and that we are free to "marry" who we like. But marriage itself is a social institutional illusion that has little to actually do with mating for life. Marriage is a social institution currently based on romantic love rather than contrived family commercially motivated affairs. And this institution is used as a means and tool of governmental control. We esssentially need government permission to marry and divorce. We need to pay the system for the privilege, Money makes this mad world "spin" itself dizzy, after all.
We exist to serve government and any liberty we gain is not freedom. Freedom is not granted. Freedom is our natural state and you are free to fall in love with who you fall in love with. You are free to be attracted to who you are attracted to. None of this defines you. Identity itself is a convenient social construct lie. The 21st century is an era of a digitally reinforced gender based identity campaign that seeks to further define our reality for us.
We need simple local controlled bureaucracies that serve us. We can then use a human system to simply keep track of our own personal agreements and contracts, without all the needless fees, fines, jail time and governmental permission. We basically seek permission to marry and seek permission to divorce, from state or religion it matters not. Both are the same, one just makes liberal us of the fear of guns to enforce its will.
Gay marriage relies on more governmental authority not less. This issue was used to grow Federal government power.
We need a lot less of the federal, state and county governments. In fact we need none of it. We need local controlled bureaucracies that actually serve humanity.
It would really be a good idea to free ourselves from the seemingly endless divide and conquer politics and to bend government to our collective will by turning it into something we have local control over.
You are not your social security number, you are not the name on your governmental issued papers. We are not human resource meant to be exploited by our own kind. We are free human beings. We are not our choices and identities are convenient social fictions and nothing more. Identity politics takes many forms and the "straight" and "LGBT" labels are just another form of officially approved and crafted, shallow and meaningless identity product. The government is interested into getting us to sort ourselves into easily managed communities and really does not sell true tolerance. The news media and the rest of the Hollywood babel is the real weapon that the military uses to keep us the mass public, docile.
Gay, straight, transgender and the rest of the labels are an insult to humanity itself we would all be better off without.
We must stop allowing government to take advantage of our natures. They bait and switch us instead of staying out of our business; they only seek to get further involved with what each of us does and thinks and believes. The road to hell and wage enslavement is paved with some of the best intent after all, but the fact is governments serve international banking interests and not any of us.
Growing The Federal Beast: The "Supreme" Law Of The Land
"Anthony McLeod Kennedy (born July 23, 1936) is the senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States who was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on November 11, 1987, and took the oath of office on February 18, 1988.
Kennedy became the most senior Associate Justice on the court following the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016. Since the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006, he has been the swing vote on many of the Court's 5–4 decisions. He has authored the majority ruling in many of these cases, including Lawrence v. Texas, Boumediene v. Bush, Citizens United v. FEC, and Obergefell v. Hodges."
"Two years later, Kennedy authored the majority ruling in the decision of Obergefell v. Hodges, which holds that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry nationwide. The closing paragraph of Kennedy's ruling has been used by many couples in their marriage vows:
No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were."