A Proper Gander At Propaganda

Truth Transcends Community

"Propaganda in the United States is spread by both government and media entities. Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to influence opinions. It's used in advertising, radio, newspaper, posters, books, television, and other media."  -  Propaganda in the United States - Wikipedia

"A man without a government is like a fish without a bicycle.” Alvaro Koplovich

Article index

Twin Tower Rescue Drills 9/11!

 

A Predictive Proper Gander


TWIN DEATH.jpg

"May 2, 1968: Advert in New York Times Warns of WTC Danger, Shows Plane About to Strike One of the Towers"

"A civic group opposed to the building of the World Trade Center publishes a nearly full-page advertisement in the New York Times, warning that the new buildings will be so tall that a commercial airliner might crash into them. The group, called the Committee for a Reasonable World Trade Center, is mainly composed of New York real estate developers who are worried that the huge construction project will glut the market. Its leader is Lawrence A. Wien, a real estate mogul who is an owner of the Empire State Building in New York. [NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 9/8/2002NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 9/8/2002]"

image and quote source: http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a050268wienadvert


9/11/2001 was the day the world changed forever.

This event would wake some of us up to the lies of the government, News media and history. The official 9/11 story is physically impossible. The only reason most people buy into it is because they have been long conditioned by the television medium to believe their trusted News journalist friends. Most adult minds truly believe that when the News, government and scientific authorities agree, it must be true, despite common sense reasoning to the contrary. Human beings are much too subject to crowd psychologically and propaganda related, manipulative techniques. It is part of our human Nature to flock together like geese and to follow perceived leaders of one kind or another, even imaginary ones or concepts. Most of us are as unaware of the multimedia noise machine medium and its very real retarding effect on human intellect, as fish are unaware of the water they breathe and swim in. 

There seems to be numerous examples of media "predictive programming" that foreshadows the 9/11 event. Some of it goes back to some years before the turn of the millennium. The idea that a passenger jet would or could crash into the Twin Towers, goes back to even before the Twin Towers were built, when they were just gleams in the two Rockefellers' glittering eyes.

Perhaps there is a mundane explanation for all the apparent, multimedia 9/11 Twin Towers Demolitions "predictive programming" imagery.


"Feb. 15, 1964 A Times article says a group has raised the question of the towers' safety in the case of an explosion or airplane crash. Richard Roth releases a statement saying that the project's structural engineering firm has done a study proving that damage from an airplane traveling 600 miles per hour would be only local and that people elsewhere in the towers would be safe."

quote source: 1968 Advert in New York Times Shows Plane About to Strike One of ...


piaadnolink.jpg


Once upon a time there were people who were opposed to building Twin Skyscraping Towers, but that was a long time ago...


Go Tell It On The Mountain

"1968 Advert in New York Times Shows Plane About to Strike One of the Twins Towers"

Posted by Exposure on April 17, 2014 at 2:30pm

WTCimageplane_205008172226416.jpg

"In July 1945, a B-25 Army bomber struck the Empire State Building, killing 14 people. [New York Times, 2/26/1981] The committee’s advertisement shows an artist’s rendition of a large jet plane about to strike one of the proposed towers."

image and quote source: 1968 Advert in New York Times Shows Plane About to Strike One of ...


Empire State Building Plane Crash - 1945: Real Or Newsreel?

Was 9/11/2001 a sort of "reimagining" of this event?

Empire State Building Plane Crash - 1945  source: British Movietone

 


Layers of Years of Deceptive Lies Cover For 9/11 Style Truth

I wonder how true the July 1945 story is. The governments of the United States, New York City and State and New Jersey, plus any international interests, did not just wake up on January 1st 2001 and decide to pull off the inside demolitions job of the century. That I do not believe, nor does the evidence indicate this to be the case. In fact there would seem to be something near a mythic millennia of such fakery, with world of mouth hearsay as the original medium for problem, reaction, solution style, international banking, governance.

New York City is not just any city, it is a world wide financial capital. In many ways New York City itself is a Twin Banking Peer of London. The local police and fire departments are not quite like the local emergency services of more suburban and rural parts of the world. With all the interests in the city it stands to reason that some of these  people would possess security clearances. New York City and the surrounding tristate area, are an old, traditional and integral economic hub in the global financial enterprising empire that is still of obvious utmost importance to this day. The local authorities would have to deal not only with interstate issues, but also international ones as New York City is home to the United Nations and all the diplomatically immune embassy staff and officials that go along with it. These people as well as all the Federal, state and local officials would all live in the city or surrounding tristate area.

NYC: The Multimedia City

What most might not also think about is that New York City is also an artistic, television, News and film capital and is a twin to the west coast in terms of film and television production. Not only does New York City serve as setting to film and television offerings, but the surrounding suburbs do as well. There is a lot of television and film production as well as governmental and military style drills occurring around New York City. New York City is not only an international banking city, it is one of the  multimedia capitals of the world.


"...damage from an airplane traveling 600 miles per hour would be only local and that people elsewhere in the towers would be safe."

"A civic group opposed to the building of the World Trade Center publishes a nearly full-page advertisement in the New York Times warning that the new buildings will be so tall that a commercial airliner might crash into them. The group called the Committee for a Reasonable World Trade Center, was mainly composed of New York real estate developers who were worried that the huge construction project will glut the market.  Its leader is Lawrence A. Wien, a real estate mogul who is an owner of the Empire State Building in New York. In July 1945, a B-25 Army bomber struck the Empire State Building, killing 14 people. [New York Times, 2/26/1981] The committee’s advertisement shows an artist’s rendition of a large jet plane about to strike one of the proposed towers. [New York Times Magazine, 9/8/2002; New York Times Magazine, 9/8/2002]  Lawrence A. Wien."

"April 30, 1921 The Port of New York Authority is created. Eventually the Port Authority adds tunnels, bridges, railroad complexes, airports and roads to its portfolio."


"Oct. 31, 1955 Over lunch, Robert Moses suggests to David Rockefeller that his plans to build a new headquarters for Chase Manhattan Bank on Cedar Street could be "a disaster" unless he can stop the flight of other businesses from Lower Manhattan to Midtown. 1957-58 David Rockefeller and other New York business leaders recommend developing the East River waterfront below the Brooklyn Bridge, as a way to revitalize downtown. The Port Authority quickly becomes involved in conceptual planning for what was then called a "World Trade and Financial Center."

"In The Times, Huxtable calls the project "something of a gamble, since its real impact can never be visualized from a model." 

"Feb. 15, 1964 A Times article says a group has raised the question of the towers' safety in the case of an explosion or airplane crash. Richard Roth releases a statement saying that the project's structural engineering firm has done a study proving that damage from an airplane traveling 600 miles per hour would be only local and that people elsewhere in the towers would be safe."

continued: 1968 Advert in New York Times Shows Plane About to Strike One of ...


Never Forget NORAD Failed "Us"

"On September 11, 2001, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) was involved in an ongoing operation which involved deploying fighter aircraft to northwestern North America. The U.S. Military and NORAD had also planned to conduct several military exercises and a drill was being held by the National Reconnaissance Office, a Department of Defense agency. The operations, exercises and drills were all canceled following the September 11 attacks."

source: United States government operations and exercises on September 11 ...



 

Facts Often Get Mixed With Apologetic Lies

Do you really think they didn't run coordinated drills after the 1993 attack on the Twin Towers? Does that sound like the government we all know? Does history really support such an idea when New York City was always an international banking hub? Or were such drills ignored on purpose?  Was Mayor 'Neva Forget 911 Guiliani' sincere in his criticism of the Port Authority or was that all part of a scripted long con strategy?  We do know they were going to do a drill on 9/11/2001 itself, or so we've been told. And all evidence indicates that this is indeed the case, with a real pair of twin demolishing exceptions, of course. It does seem like 9/11/2001 was planned well in advance, at least as far back as 1993, if not further back in time. The official governmentally approved history of our world comes across as nothing but a continuous and endless really long confidence game.

see: Short and long cons

911 drills.jpg

"Fratto: ‘No One Could Have Anticipated’ Terrorists Flying Planes Into Buildings Before 9/11"

The 9/11 narrative contains plenty of twists and dramatic turns, IE plenty of contradictory lies.

source: Fratto: 'No One Could Have Anticipated' Terrorists Flying Planes Into ...


Continuity Errors Happen:  The Twin Towers Could Officially ( and sensibly) Easily Withstand A Passenger Jet Strike

And of course flying planes into buildings, specifically the Twin Towers was something officials considered and planned for.

Until The Script Called For Something Different

11_7_1982.jpg

Contradictory Official Accounts Create Opportunity  For Official Conspiracy Promoted Nonsense

Edward Bernays Was Right

Could a passenger jet bring down a massive steel tower or not? Official accounts are somewhat confusing, logic and common sense on the other hand should be very clear that the official accounts are nonsense and nothing more. The claim itself is so fantastically incredible that only a population long accustomed to such dumbing down could possibly accept it. This kind of obviously absurd narratives relies on crowd psychology, which seems to work as advertised. People follow leaders and even just the ideas of leaders. People really seem to prefer not having their beliefs challenged, perhaps especially when those beliefs are so obviously wrong. The News media  focuses on empty emotional appeals with numerous victim interviews of one kind or another for good reason. Humans are sympathetic creatures and our emotions are easily manipulated with moving picture product.  (please see: http://www.aamorris.net/properganderatpropaganda/2017/8/17/youre-on-the-wrong-side-of-history for more.)

Emotional appeals distract the audience, in terms of getting  the audience emotionally engaged instead of intellectually engaging with the claims being made by government and News media witnesses.

"Sightseers at the towers over the past few years would have seen a reassuring information panel at the top floor visitors' centre, explaining how they should not worry about plane crashes as the building was made to withstand them."

source: Twin towers 'built to withstand plane crash' - Telegraph


Of Course Massive Steel Structures Can Withstand A Passenger Jet Crash

rrScreenshot_20170918-142011.jpg

9/11 Was High End, Governmentally Sponsored Performance Art

No tabloid, top secret, Tesla technology needed to explain careful controlled demolitions and a confidence trick that probably took years to set up. The 9/11 World Trade Center demolitions is a true feat of 20th century engineering and an impressive inside job. This was also the ultimate long con and multimedia crisis, public relations event. This bit of history shows off the real power of government and the real terrifying weaponry it possesses. The trusted News journalist is the true terrorist. The television screen has always been the deceitful medium of and for and by government. The primary purpose of all the various forms of communication media is to maintain the existence of, and to grow more, government. The power government has over human imagination world wide, is most impressive. 

image: Originally shared by Luis Torres


No matter how fast the jet travels, it cannot penetrate the steel. No matter how many gallons of fuel it has in its wings, that amount of fuel is nothing compared to all the steel. The official 9/11 story is a complete cartoon lie.

"The attack and following collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 shocked the world. The enormous travesty occurred so fast and so surprisingly. But what may also shock you is that architect Minoru Yamasaki designed the World Trade Center towers to withstand a collision with a Boeing 707 airplane (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2002). The Boeing 707 is similar to the Boeing 767s that actually crashed into the towers, the main differences being that the 767 is slightly heavier and slower."

 

source: If the World Trade Center Towers were designed to withstand the ...


Back to the Future Past: 9/11/2001 or Rather 11/7/1982

Is this an example of a real predictive style "programming" of sorts?

'November 7, 1982: Port Authority Practices for Plane Crashing into the WTC'

"February 20, 1981: Boeing 707 Nearly Hits Television Mast atop World Trade Center A Boeing 707 belonging to an Argentine airline comes close to hitting the television mast atop the World Trade Center’s North Tower. The plane is flying in clouds at 1,500 feet, instead of at its assigned altitude of 3,000 feet, and descending toward Kennedy Airport. About four miles, or less than 90 seconds, from the WTC, the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) in Hempstead, Long Island, becomes aware of the situation thanks to a new automated alarm system and is able to radio the pilot with the order to climb. The alarm system that sounds, called Minimum Safe Altitude Warning, has been in operation for about a year. When radar shows a plane at an altitude within 500 feet of the highest obstruction in a particular area and 30 seconds away, a buzzer sounds repeatedly at the TRACON. At the same time, the letters LA (for low altitude) flash on the radar scope next to the plane’s blip. [NEW YORK TIMES, 2/26/1981]"

"November 7, 1982: Port Authority Practices for Plane Crashing into the WTC The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey holds a drill at the World Trade Center based on the scenario of a plane crashing into one of the Twin Towers. Numerous agencies participate in the drill, which is held on a Sunday. As well as the Port Authority, these include the New York City Fire Department, the New York City Police Department, and the Emergency Medical Services. Guy Tozzoli, the director of the Port Authority’s World Trade Department, will describe the drill during a legislative hearing in 1993 (see (March 29, 1993)). He will recall that the Port Authority simulates the “total disaster” of “the airplane hitting the building” and participants simulate “blood coming out of people.” He will add that the drill is “a real preparation for a disaster.” [NEWSDAY, 11/12/2001; DWYER AND FLYNN, 2005, PP. 58-59] (During the hearing, Tozzoli will mistakenly recall the drill being conducted in the late 1970s, but it is in fact held in November 1982. [DWYER AND FLYNN, 2005, PP. 274] ) The drill follows an incident in 1981, when an Argentine aircraft came within 90 seconds of crashing into the WTC’s North Tower as a result of having problems communicating with air traffic controllers (see February 20, 1981). Asked about the drill shortly after 9/11, Tozzoli will say it was held “just to have people trained within the city for that particular scenario [of a plane hitting the WTC].” The 1982 exercise appears to be the last “joint drill involving all the emergency responders” held at the WTC prior to the 9/11 attacks, 19 years later, according to New York Times reporters Jim Dwyer and Kevin Flynn. [NEWSDAY, 11/12/2001; DWYER AND FLYNN, 2005, PP. 59]"

source: http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a110782crashdrill


"The Twin Towers were specifically designed to withstand a plane impact of a 707 traveling at 600 mph without collapsing."

"February 27, 1993: WTC Engineer Says Building Would Survive Jumbo Jet Hitting It"

"In the wake of the WTC bombing, the Seattle Times interviews John Skilling who was one of the two structural engineers responsible for designing the Trade Center. Skilling recounts his people having carried out an analysis which found the Twin Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707. He says, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed.” But, he says, “The building structure would still be there.” [SEATTLE TIMES, 2/27/1993] The analysis Skilling is referring to is likely one done in early 1964, during the design phase of the towers. A three-page white paper, dated February 3, 1964, described its findings: “The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.” However, besides this paper, no documents are known detailing how this analysis was made. [GLANZ AND LIPTON, 2004, PP. 131-132; LEW, BUKOWSKI, AND CARINO, 10/2005, PP. 70-71] The other structural engineer who designed the towers, Leslie Robertson, carried out a second study later in 1964, of how the towers would handle the impact of a 707 (see Between September 3, 2001 and September 7, 2001). However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), following its three-year investigation into the WTC collapses, will in 2005 state that it has been “unable to locate any evidence to indicate consideration of the extent of impact-induced structural damage or the size of a fire that could be created by thousands of gallons of jet fuel.” [NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 9/2005, PP. 13]"

source: http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-twin-towers-were-specifically-designed-to-withstand-a-plane-impact-of-a-707-traveling-at-600-mph-without-collapsing/


January 17, 1984: Port Authority Terrorist Intelligence Unit Issues Report on WTC Security

  "Caram specifically mentions that terrorists could use a car bomb in the subgrade area—a situation similar to what occurs in the 1993 bombing."

"Detective Sergeant Peter Caram, the head of the New York Port Authority’s Terrorist Intelligence Unit, has been directed by the assistant superintendent of the Port Authority Police Department to compile a report on the vulnerability of the WTC to a terrorist attack. Having previously worked at the WTC Command, Caram has exclusive knowledge of some of the center’s security weaknesses. On this day he issues his four-page report, titled “Terrorist Threat and Targeting Assessment: World Trade Center.” It looks at the reasoning behind why the WTC might be singled out for attack, and identifies three areas of particular vulnerability: the perimeter of the WTC complex, the truck dock entrance, and the subgrade area (the lower floors below ground level). Caram specifically mentions that terrorists could use a car bomb in the subgrade area—a situation similar to what occurs in the 1993 bombing (see February 26, 1993)."

sourcehttp://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a110782crashdrill



"Crash Scenario Foretold in '93 WTC official wanted plan for jet disaster By Graham Rayman STAFF WRITER November 12, 2001"

(entire article:)

"A former World Trade Center director suggested in a public hearing after the 1993 bombing there that the Port Authority and city emergency agencies train for the scenario of an airplane slamming into the towers, a transcript shows. But the March 29, 1993, recommendation of Guy Tozzoli - who was so closely associated with the complex that he was known as "Mr. World Trade Center" - was overlooked. No training exercise involving an airplane scenario was done, senior Port Authority officials said last week. In September 2000, however, the Port Authority and the Fire Department did conduct a simulation of a five-alarm fire on the 93rd floor of one tower, an exercise officials described as a "major disaster drill." The Tozzoli recommendation ultimately may be a footnote in history, but, according to one expert, it seems to contradict the contentions of officials that no one could have prepared for such an event. "The fact that this was explicitly suggested by Port Authority personnel in a public hearing certainly suggests that there was or should have been awareness of this threat and consideration of planning for it among the effected agencies," said Charles Jennings, a professor of fire protection at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. In the wake of Sept. 11, Jennings said there is a need for a high-level independent review of the incident to document what happened and try to draw long-term lessons. At the time of the hearings, the focus was security within the tower garage - where terrorists detonated a massive truck bomb, killing six people and injuring 1,000 - and the difficulties of the huge evacuation. State Sen. Roy Goodman, who presided over the hearings, did not include Tozzoli's recommendation in his 34-page report on the 1993 hearings titled "A Tragic Wake-Up Call." Of the four daily newspapers, only Newsday wrote about the hearing, focusing on fire-code issues. Tozzoli's testimony was not mentioned in the press.

Though Goodman omitted Tozzoli's recommendation from the report, he said through a spokesperson yesterday: "Unfortunately recommendations were largely ignored as time dulled the sensitivity of the public to terrorist threats." Port Authority spokesman Allan Morrison said the agency spent more than $50 million to upgrade security throughout the complex after 1993, and millions more on safety improvements.

"We believe that the World Trade Center was one of the most secure office buildings in America from a terrorism prevention point of view," Morrison said. "Obviously, there are limits to our ability to prevent against all possible acts of terrorism, not to mention the unprecedented act of war of Sept. 11." Tozzoli made the suggestion on the third day of the hearings, the transcript said. He was the final witness, and his recommendation was his last statement in the hearing.

When Goodman asked Tozzoli for advice, he recalled that in the late 1970s, Port Authority personnel, along with city fire marshals, police, the Emergency Medical Service and officials from local hospitals, performed a similar drill in the towers, the transcript said. "I thought back to one thing we had done in the 1970s," said Tozzoli, who retired from the Port Authority in 1987. "[We] simulated on a Sunday, the disaster of the airplane hitting the building. Together with the Fire Department, Police Department, EMS, hospital, and senator, that might not be a bad idea to try that in other public buildings." "The building management simulated a total disaster?" Goodman asked. "Total. Total disaster," Tozzoli replied. "Did fire marshals participate?" Goodman asked. "Everybody," Tozzoli replied. "Fire marshals, the city, the Police Department, the hospitals. They're very important. And I remember we simulated blood coming out of people. The medical department was there, and it really was a real preparation for a disaster, if you would. "It's very difficult to talk about a bomb," he added. "But you know, things can happen. And I thought this is probably a very good idea."

Earlier in his testimony, Tozzoli described a computer simulation performed back when the towers were still under construction. The simulation used a 707, the largest jet at the time, flying at 220 mph into one of the towers, he said. "The computer said it would blow out the structural steel supports along one side of the building completely to seven floors, and naturally there would be a large loss of life on those seven floors because of the explosion," Tozzoli testified. "However, the structure of the building would permit the 50 floors or whatever it is above to remain and not topple because the loans would distribute themselves around the other three walls and then eventually be assimilated in the floors below."  In the three days of hearings, that was the only time that an airplane scenario came up in any detail. "I don't know if they did it [the training exercise]," Tozzoli said in a telephone interview last week. "We practiced it back then [in the late '70s] just to have people trained within the city for that particular scenario." Alan Reiss, a Port Authority official who ran the trade center until July, said in an interview that no exercise based on an airplane scenario was done over the past eight years. He said, though, that almost exactly one year before the attacks, in September 2000, the Port Authority and Fire Department participated in an exercise on a Sunday morning that simulated a five-alarm fire on an upper floor in one of the towers. Five Fire Department engine companies were involved in the exercise, which occurred on an empty floor. Smoke generators were employed, and the elevators were unavailable.

"It was a major full-floor high-rise fire," Reiss said. "It was a full-scale fire simulation." Frank Gribbon, a spokesman for the Fire Department, said the exercise was videotaped. After 1993, the Port Authority added 10,000-pound planters around the buildings, security barriers in the garage, a photo identification system, surveillance cameras and other security upgrades. The agency also added back-up power and lighting systems, independent fire command stations in each building and other safety improvements. 
Copyright © 2002, Newsday, Inc."

source: http://web.archive.org/web/20020412234558/http:/www.newsday.com/news/local/newyork/ny-nydril122460832nov12.story?coll=ny-top-headlines


"Demolition by Hydraulic Jacks"  Part One: 9/11 & The Kajima Corporation


Daruma-otoshi skyscraper demolition  source: pinktentacle3

 

The Kajima Corporation's "Structural Responses of World Trade Center under Aircraft Attacks" 

"The Japanese Kajima Corporation produced a paper called "Structural Responses of World Trade Center under Aircraft Attacks" in January 2005. All that's available online, unless you pay for the document, is this abstract: At the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the New York World Trade Center (WTC) Towers, extensive structural damage, including localized collapse, occurred at several floor levels directly impacted by the aircraft. Despite this massive localized damage, each structure remained standing for approximately 1 h or 1 h 30 min. Although the damage to the beams and columns in the perimeter tube of each tower were clarified in the published ASCE/FEMA report, the damage to the floor system and inner core columns were not estimated. The purpose of this study is to determine why the towers remained standing after impact through several analytical studies, including impact analyses using a simplified model to estimate the overall damage, a rigorous finite element model to estimate the local damage, and stress analyses after some structural members are lost. The results of the stress analyses show why both buildings did not collapse immediately after impact, and WTC2 collapsed sooner than WTC1."

source: http://www.911myths.com/html/view_from_abroad.html

The Kajima Cut and Take Down Method

"Buildings are usually demolished by placing heavy equipment and workers on the top floor of a building, and lowering dismantled material to ground level.
Kajima, however, demolished its former head office buildings using a world-first technique called the Kajima Cut and Take Down Method, which enables demolition work to be carried out on the ground floor. By starting at the bottom, gutting one floor, and then lowering the entire building down on jacks, one floor at a time, all the work can be performed safely at ground level. The Kajima Cut and Take Down Method affords a building being dismantled the same level of seismic and wind resistance throughout demolition.We install a Core Wall System and Load Transferring Frame into a building's structure to maintain the same level of seismic resistance during the demolition work. Although our method could be applied to almost any type of building, there are some conditions that may limit the use of this method."

source: The Kajima Cut and Take Down Method | Technology & Services ...

Kajima.jpg

You Can't Fool Mother Nature & It's Unwise To Trust Uncle Sam: Layers of Lies Protect The Truth

The public has been governmentally and historically pranked. Merry melodies cartoons can't hurt anyone. By the way, don't tell anyone, but it sure looks like all NORAD is is just computer based roleplaying simulation and not much else.

There's no need for anything else.

The world is a lot safer than the governments need you to know.

Belief in the need for governmental protection means the public keeps paying needless taxes and keeps supporting the cancerous growth of more and more layers of governmental control over our individual lives.

"In September 11, 2001, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) was involved in an ongoing operation which involved deploying fighter aircraft to northwestern North America. The U.S. Military and NORAD had also planned to conduct several military exercises and a drill was being held by the National Reconnaissance Office, a Department of Defense agency. The operations, exercises and drills were all canceled following the September 11 attacks."

source: United States government operations and exercises on September 11 ...


Building the World Trade Center and Twin Towers - 2 of 2

Twin mountains of around a million tons of impenetrable steel need not fear two (less than) two hundred ton aluminum and fiberglass passenger jets filled mostly with air.

Building the World Trade Center and Twin Towers - 2 of 2 source: 911veritas


NEVER FORGET: 9/11 WAS THE ULTIMATE INSIDE (DEMOLITIONS & PUBLIC RELATIONS-CON) JOB

A certain number of Federal, State and more local emergency, governmental and private corporate employed personal would seem to have to be part of the scripted show.


DIDN'T YOU KNOW?


"Did you know that in 1993 one of the WTC engineers said that the buildings were “safe” in the event of a “collision with a large jet airliner”? In 1982 drills were run simulating a “plane crashing into the WTC”. And between 1999 – 2001 authorities in New York took part in exercises that simulated major fires on the floors of the twin towers."


jumbo-jet-wtc-twin-towers-911-634x381.jpg

"February 27, 1993: WTC Engineer Says Building Would Survive Jumbo Jet Hitting It"

"In the wake of the WTC bombing, the Seattle Times interviews John Skilling who was one of the two structural engineers responsible for designing the Trade Center. Skilling recounts his people having carried out an analysis which found the Twin Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707. He says, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed.” But, he says, “The building structure would still be there.”

"(March 22-29, 1993): Hearings Held to Discuss WTC Bombing and Continuing Terrorist Threat"

"Three days of public hearings are held to examine the security and safety aspects of the recent World Trade Center bombing. New York State Senator Roy Goodman (R-Manhattan) presides over the hearings. His committee questions 26 witnesses in what journalists Wayne Barrett and Dan Collins will later call “a no-holds-barred probe of the City [of New York] and of the Port Authority.”

Bombing Was a ‘Dire Warning’ – During the hearings, Goodman calls the WTC “an extremely inviting target” for terrorists, and says the recent bombing (see February 26, 1993) was a “tragic wake-up call” and “a dire warning of the future disasters which could occur with far greater loss of life if we fail to prepare” for terrorism “here at home.” He also refers to a number of Port Authority consultant and internal security reports, which predicted the kind of bombing that occurred at the WTC, and criticizes Port Authority officials who appear for failing to follow the recommendations of these reports. Detective Says He Fears a ‘Further Disaster’ – One Port Authority employee who appears, Detective Sergeant Peter Caram, warns about the continuing threat to the WTC. Caram is the only Port Authority employee with a top security clearance and who is assigned to the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force. He says he fears a “further disaster somewhere down the line” and, referring to the WTC, implores the Port Authority to “harden our target.” James Fox, the assistant director in charge of the FBI’s New York office, similarly warns, “We would be well advised to prepare for the worst and hope for [the] best.” And New York City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly says New York should remain at “a heightened state of awareness and readiness for the foreseeable future.” "

image and quotes source: 1993: Twin Towers Engineer Says "It Can Survive Jumbo Jet Hit ...


A Post-Modern Media Blues In The Key of C-Flat

New York City is not just any city. It is a federal and international city. The mayor's office and police and fire departments have to work with higher levels of government. 9/11 is unlikely a crime as government cannot commit crime against itself, can it? Crime indicates someone broke a law. Laws are legally defined by government. I doubt very much if there would ever be any way to take any kind of real case to trial, I doubt the system allows for that in any meaningful kind of way. We do not need to consider anything past all the National Security laws that could be invoked to prevent even an official court record account. Any talk of taking this to court is a pipe dream. Faked events like 9/11 are how history is done and how the world has long been run. You don't just wake up on 9/11/2000 and decide to pull off an event on the scale of 9/11/2001. You have to have the confidence that such a huge hoax can actually work and this would be a confidence gained from decades and even centuries of getting away with lesser sins. Humanity is a vast resource that has been conditioned to accept the unreal as real and who tend to respond to crowd psychology as advertised. The modern mass media is a more potent version of the original medium of government, hearsay and word of mouth. If you don't believe there is anything existential to fear, you will be less likely to pay your taxes for the needles (now allegorical) castle walls and (all too real) inspecting, nosy guards at the gates.




Mass Hysteria

"In sociology and psychology, mass hysteria (also known as collective hysteria, group hysteria, or collective obsessional behavior) is a phenomenon that transmits collective illusions of threats, whether real or imaginary, through a population in society as a result of rumors and fear (memory acknowledgment)."

source and example list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_hysteria


[Vintage] World Trade Center Construction Promo (1968-1972)  source:  itwontcomeout5678


What appears to be a real photograph from September 11, 2001:

Please notice what appears to be some kind of construction wrapping around the tower.

The same kind of wrapping is visible in the photos of the towers' construction, (see below).

9_11.jpg
Twin+Towers+History.jpg

Welcome To The Passenger Jet Graveyard

Aluminum and fiberglass are no match for steel.

How Do They Do It? - Airplane Recycling  source: Hooray4ATC


Nose Lies.jpg

For More Please Click Here: The 9-11 Governmental Puppet Show


Taking Buildings Apart Beam by Beam

Large steel structures can be dismantled without wrecking ball or explosives. Is it possible portions of the Twin Towers were slowly dismantled, or at least weakened, from within prior to 9/11/? Would this explain how these huge constructs essentially fell into their own footprints? Whatever really happened that day, the real explanation is more than likely an impressive but mundane, engineering one. The Twin Towers demolition would have had to have been an inside job with many high level governmental and corporate minds being in on it. Please read the following article for more about this subject:  President Donald Trump's 9/11 Demolitions Guide.

Top 10 Tallest Buildings That No Longer Exist  source: GimSoori


Rising From The Ashes of Ground Zero: The Twins Become One

All is One & One is All

When space is a premium one has to build up.

One World Trade Center full video 2015 (HD+)  source: Official HD Documentary

All hail iconic obelisk idol.

Ra Ra shish boom ba! All cheer the rising phallic member of Osiris, symbol of Sun obsessed culture.

Brought to you by the pyramidal powers that be, a collection of old and even older families. These people have been putting the "Cult" into Culture for centuries.

The Apocalypse of A $olar Obsessed $un Based Commercial Cult

Ours is a culture obsessed with artificial constructs like money, time and space. Today many seem to be under the single stoned delusive spell that all three are essentially the same thing. Too many of us worship at the alter of the most powerful world wide icon and religious, holy symbol ever, the almighty dollar sign.


Unknown-1.jpg

It Ain't That Easy, It Never Is

The government and the News media sell the idea that a truck bomb can magically take down huge steel towering structure as easily as aluminum air filled tubes can. I doubt that van based explosives can replace careful demolitions experts, I doubt this profession has anything to fear from either truck bombs, air filled aluminum tubes or passenger jet fuel. The art of demolitions will not be so easily replaced with cartoon logic based rationale.


Demolition by Hydraulic Jacks: Part Two

Could this technology be older than the official claim?

"A Japanese construction company is using giant jacks and electricity-generating cranes to dismantle a high-rise tower in Tokyo, floor by floor. Taisei Corporation is using its Ecological Reproduction System (Tecorep) to gradually lower the Grand Prince Hotel Akasaka, and bemused passersby have already witnessed the 140m-high (about 460 feet) tower quietly shrink to 110m (about 360 feet). It's a far more elegant method when compared with the much-unchanged tack of getting something big and heavy and smashing it into a building, or the presumably fun but incredibly messy process of blowing it up. Buildings are of course dismantled using cranes already, but only from the exterior and for towers under 100m — and they're far from green. Having investigated new methods since 2008, Taisei is suggesting that for buildings over 100m we need to adopt a new approach."

source: Japan's Quiet Skyscraper-Demolition Technique Generates Energy ...  For more about this please click here: President Donald Trump's 9/11 Demolitions Guide.

Demolition by hydraulic jacks  source: Mark Anthony



TRUMP TWIN TOWERS.jpg

 

A Cartoon Crafting Postscript: How Take Create Terrorism Artifacts

Theory of Ghostplane  source: CollinAlexander

The Computer Did 9/11

I don't know if CNN itself crafted this imagery or not, what I do know is that it looks like whoever created the obviously fake footage used Adobe After Effects or similar program. (see: Adobe After Effects - Wikipedia)