A Proper Gander At Propaganda

TRUTH TRANSCENDS COMMUNITY

"Propaganda in the United States is spread by both government and media entities. Propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to influence opinions. It's used in advertising, radio, newspaper, posters, books, television, and other media."  -  Propaganda in the United States - Wikipedia

"A man without a government is like a fish without a bicycle.” Alvaro Koplovich

"The rise of modern print culture The printing press and the relatively wide availability of printed materials further undermine the importance of the 'local community' in ... Feudal societies based on face-to-face loyalties and oral oaths begin to give way to nation-states and to nationalism based on a shared printed language." Marshall McLuhan: Theoretical elaborations

"The printing press gave rise to nationalism and nation states while the Internet is helping to create a world community."  Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan

About A Proper Gander At Propaganda:

This is not another conspiracy website. This website exists to serve as free public resource for reverse imagineering world-wide culture. I, AA Morris, am merely the curator of this website and blog. You need no permission from me to reproduce anything you find here. Simply source and credit those who obviously deserve credit as we are all supposed to do. You need not credit AA Morris. You can use anything I write and any art work or video I produce as you like, without needing to credit or source me. This website should be considered a virtual museum of sorts, a gallery of art and other types of relics that represent our shared world-wide cultural heritage.

Thank you for your time,

AA "The Proper Gander" Morris

Article index

Space X Rockets Are Not Real: Outer Space is Not A Real Place

 

AA+MORRIS+SPACE X HOAX.gif

PRESENTS: THE SPACE X ROCKET HOAX

Article last updated  7:54 PM Tuesday, February 13, 2018 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT)

SCROLL DOWN TO SEE WHAT HAS CHANGED

(Please excuse any type you may come across, auto spell correct is an evil gremlin. AA Morris)

image source: First Ever Falcon Heavy Rocket Launch and Landing  •  Cocoa Beach 365  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFmtaEaWMjw&t=34s


SPACE X ROCKETS ARE IMPOSSIBLE

SPACE X is a B Grade special effects studio. This is all the evidence we can actually interact with and examine reveals to us.

Film or video footage of crowd reaction shots are a form of manipulative crowd psychology. We are supposed to believe what we see on screens; this is a huge mistake. The fact is, highly edited footage, intercut with b-roll footage of crowds, is not evidence. Film and video footage are claims and should be treated as visual gossip and hearsay. Special effects are as old as photography itself and the rocket programs of the world were always more the result of research and development in Hollywood film making techniques and technology and have little to do with any real world aerospace applications as we are told.

Huge rockets and ballistic missiles are propaganda artifacts.

Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear.

Verbal gossip was the original medium of government. Verbal gossip still exists, of course, and is now enhanced with digital visual and audio fidelity. Some people claim they have seen rocket launches with their own eyes; I doubt such claims are true, but if somehow they are, it is unlikely that these people have witnessed real rockets launched as advertised. The rockets we in the public can actually interact with are small and rise with rapid acceleration into the sky, unlike the slow balloon like rise of huge rocket imagery.

Aerial perspective makes claims of seeing rocket launches from a distance seem very questionable to say the least,

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_perspective

636262901923777104-ATLAS-V-ROCKET-LAUNCH-CR-109223 (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: https://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2017/03/29/10-great-places-watch-rocket-launch/99730718/

Celebrity stage magician Penn Jillette claims to have witnessed a Space Shuttle launch.

Accounts from stage illusionists like Penn Jillette are not evidence of anything but gossip based propaganda.

6a00e5526185a1883400e5534ee7588833-800wi (0.00.00.00).jpg

Penn & Teller: NASA Bull Sh...

"TELLER: When I was a kid, the Space Race was just beginning.  I remember making a model of Sputnik out of a baseball painted silver and stuck with nails.  I got plastic rocket models of rocket ships and put them together (and I was not a kid who instinctively loved gluing irritating little parts together according to directions).  I followed John Glenn's first space journey.  Going into space was clear proof that anything was possible to a human being with imagination, intelligence, industry, and guts.  Nothing could demonstrate that clearly or more dramatically.  It was the idea of America made visible, just as clearly as Houdini's "self-liberation" symbolized America to the early 20th century."

image and quote source: Penn & Teller "BS": Ep. 603: NASA •   http://ptbs.typepad.com/penn_teller_bullshit/2008/07/nasa.html

The Military Entertainment Complex™

I would suggest not trusting celebrity accounts. Hollywood is part of the Military Industrial, Aerospace Complex and always has been, Stage magicians like Georges Méliès would become early film makers and stage illusions would become Hollywood special effect magic. Penn and Teller are modern day, court jester like, propagandists, just like pretty much all mainstream and even alternative radio and television talk show hosts and mainstream podcasters are, whether they know it or not. A true believer is a valuable propaganda asset. It is unlikely people like Penn and Teller are true believers, as all the evidence we can actually examine suggests that it is they who are full of "bull shit".

CASE STUDY 1897: MOTION PICTURE PROPAGANDA MAGIC

"Georges Méliès, the pioneer filmmaker, shot faked footage of the war of 1897—including the earliest shots of what was claimed to be naval warfare, and some horrific scenes of atrocities in Crete. All were created in his studio or his back yard in Paris."

source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-early-history-of-faking-war-on-film-133838317/  •   How Oscar-winning directors faked WWII combat footage | New York ...

Stage Magician Georges Méliès: Crafting Fake Moving Images of War & "Outer Space"

Georges-Melies-368x500 (0.00.00.00).jpg

Stage Illusionist Turned Early Film Pioneer Georges Méliès & 1902's "A Trip To The Moon"

"Georges Méliès (December 1861 – 21 January 1938), was a French illusionist and film director who led many technical and narrative developments in the earliest days of cinema. Méliès was an especially prolific innovator in the use of special effects, popularizing such techniques as substitution splices, multiple exposures, time-lapse photography, dissolves, and hand-painted color. He was also one of the first filmmakers to use storyboards. His films include A Trip to the Moon (1902) and The Impossible Voyage (1904), both involving strange, surreal journeys somewhat in the style of Jules Verne, and are considered among the most important early science fiction films, though their approach is closer to fantasy."

image and quote sources: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-early-history-of-faking-war-on-film-133838317/  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Trip_to_the_Moon  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Méliès

(Please see: FAKE NEWS IS NOTHING NEW: MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THE PROPAGANDA WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION & THE GUTENBERG GALAXY: THE MAKING OF TYPOGRAPHIC MAN for more about this subject.)

"NASA’S SUCCESSFUL QUANTIFYING OF COMEDY TIMING (By Penn Jillette and Teller)"

"Excerpt from “How To Play In Traffic”, Penn Jillette and Teller, 1997 (out of print).  This is long, but for my money, it’s the best thing about the space shuttle ever written."

"Because some scientists like to hang out with dumb-assed comedians, they let me watch space shuttle launches from the V.I.P. viewing area. That area is 3.7 miles from the pad. Three point seven miles is a very long way to throw a house cat (you’d need some apparatus), but it’s pretty stinkin’ close to watch human beings get blasted into space. If you know anyone who knows anyone who knows anyone (we can get several degrees past Will Smith and Stockard Channing) who can get you V.I.P. passes to a shuttle launch, beg, call in the favor, grant sexual favors you don’t enjoy — do anything, just get yourself a pass.  If you can’t get a V.I.P. pass, don’t beat yourself up, just go to a public viewing area. It’s almost as good. You still need a pass, but you just have to ask the day before. You don’t have to give sexual favors to anyone (but it never hurts). Even from the public areas five miles away, it is still, quite simply and without any exaggeration, the best thing you will ever see. The first shuttle launch I saw was from a way public area. We didn’t even have a pass to get to the “Space Port” (what a cheesy name; I wish Disney didn’t bleed into our entire culture). We watched it with all the RVs. The first launch I saw was the last launch before Challenger blew up and, after Challenger blew up, everyone said that we had all been taking space launches for granted. Not me, must have been some other mother, but no, no, child, it wasn’t me. Maybe TV fools took them for granted, but no one that ever stood and felt NASA explode human beings into space took them for granted. I don’t ever want to have a hot beverage with anyone who would take that for granted. They wouldn’t be fun.  Every morning we’d be up at 3:30 a.m., eat our traditional astronaut breakfast of steak and eggs, and sit in the car in the pouring rain like we were making out listening to the radio. It was raining the whole week of our first shuttle, and my team of space fans would get up every morning at 5 a.m. in the rain and sit in our car, dead tired, listening to the “voice of NASA,” waiting for the mission to be scrubbed. We knew it would be scrubbed when we saw the rain coming down in sheets, but our motto was, “If the astronauts are getting up, we’re getting up.” "

source: http://symftr.tumblr.com/post/5987695109/nasas-successful-quantifying-of-comedy-timing-by

If there is any truth to this comedian's account, the people who witnessed NASA's rocket launches were likely witnessing much smaller, and less controlled projectiles than advertised, The Space Shuttle, like the rest of the artifacts of the international space programs, would seem to be another miniature effect sold as real.

10florida32 (0.00.00.00).jpg

DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT YOU SEE IN PHOTOGRAPHS WITHOUT CRITICAL THOUGHT

Darkroom photo fakery is as old as photography itself, no computers were needed to create believable photographic illusions.

image source: http://www.mightymac.org/10floridatrip05.htm

LOOK UP IN THE SKY...

We've seen images of people watching rocket launches and we've heard their applause and sounds of their excitement. We are not supposed to notice all the editing, as we are supposed to believe that it all must be true. After all, we've seen footage of rocket launches and we've seen footage of the crowd's reaction to supposedly witnessing such a fantastic and impressive achievement. Circular reasoning is the order of the day, or so it seems. Too many fail to notice that the claims of international "Outer Space" are nothing but lies.

Highly edited footage of miniature rocket launches with edited b-roll shots of crowd reactions are nothing new. This style of propaganda is essentially as old as the mass produced movie itself. The Cold War was a made for television war and is one that  continues in one form or another, to this day. All the highly edited footage we have been exposed to for over half a century proves nothing but a propaganda campaign. All the edited footage in the world and all the authoritative voice over cannot replace demonstrable reality. Huge rockets and ballistic missile threats are onscreen artifacts only. We have only been presented with highly edited and obviously contrived imagery, with the authoritative stamp of official government and News media approval. We are not supposed to figure out the secret, that the News media is the propaganda weapon of government. We are not supposed to know that all mass media, including sports and entertainment, are part of an internationally run Military Industrial Complex™, that has existed for what appears to be centuries. We are not supposed to notice all the historical and fake news lies. We are supposed to buy into obviously contrived nonsense like obvious model rockets sold as the real thing.

YouTube era Propaganda: "Elon Musk Extremely Emotional Reaction To Falcon Heavy Launch"

SPACE X IS FAKE

image source: Elon Musk Extremely Emotional Reaction To Falcon Heavy Launch  •  Elon Musk Viral Videos  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK6FSK98asc

Outer Space: The Medium For The Fake Cold War Space Race

The fake Space-X footage is nothing new. Such model rocket fakery and Hollywood darkroom illusion have long been sold as real to the mass public. This modus operandi appears to date back to the earliest days of international banking and sea based enterprises. Sea based Naval war was used as impetus for funding the building of more ships. The bankers on both sides of the war win, while the mass public toils away at the wheels of industry. This is how civilization is built. Fake and contrived tales of far off sea battles spread by word of mouth gossip was the original medium of both international banking enterprise and needless government. This practice of deception evolves into the multimedia noise machine of today. Smart screens are now the medium for both verbal and audio visual gossip that most uncritically accept as gospel. Non disclosure agreements, governmental and corporate contracts,  security clearances and  the "need to know basis", along with buckets of money, and the threat of jail time, and possible death penalty, based upon treason law, ensure how such secrets are kept and how governmental "conspiracies" work. The governments of the world and corporate enterprises, rely on non disclosure type agreements of one kind or another. Layers of classified information and layers of so-called conspiracy lies are contrived shields meant to protect the truth of international governmental fakery. We are supposed to believe the governments of the world capable of superhuman feats, like sending artificial satellites and rovers to Mars; and we are supposed to live in fear of the eternally threatened nuclear doomsday.

Not everyone in the News media or government is in on it. The governments of the world never stop running simulated drills they sell to the public and even most of their own people as real.

The governmental and News media employees are bound to be exposed to more mind altering propaganda than even the public.

Huge rockets and "Outer Space" are artifacts of an internationally imposed culture and secular religion and do not represent real world, natural phenomena. We are supposed to believe that the international space agencies possess precise control over their rocket technology; yet we are not supposed to notice that we can't wait on lines for rocket rides to low earth orbiting motels as once promised, despite some 50 years after a televised "Moon Walk". The only way any of us can interact with that place we call "Outer Space" is by virtual means of one kind or another.


PRAY FOR "OUTER SPACE"

The secret to selling miniature rocketry as real. Seemingly emotional crowd reaction shots. This is clearly a form of psychological manipulation.

Elon+Musk+jubler+hemningsløst+over+historisk+landing.gif

Outer Space Is Only An Idea: Outer Space Can Only Exist As Art of Some Kind

Highly edited footage of crowd reaction shots intercut with footage of miniature rocketry is evidence of a propaganda campaign.

image source: Elon Musk jubler hemningsløst over historisk landing  •  Dagbladet •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmdB6ezXT6o


SPACE X IS A B GRADE SPECIAL EFFECTS STUDIO

Footage of rocket and ballistic missile launches have always been the result of Hollywood miniature effects work. Toy rockets can't really destroy cities.

Images of "Outer Space" are nearly as old as the moving image itself. We have been indoctrinated with this kind of visual propaganda since at least 1902.

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_M%C3%A9li%C3%A8s •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Trip_to_the_Moon  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Lang  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_in_the_Moon

source: Sci-Fi To Reality: Russian Movie Predicts Space X Vertical Landing  •  News Breakdown  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmvmzuBVNhI


HISTORY OF ROCKETRY: EARLY 20TH CENTURY CARTOONS

1902 Cartoon Rocket

Le+Voyage+Dans+la+Lun+(A+Trip+to+the+Moon)+by+Georges+Méliès+(1902).gif

images source: 1902 film, "A Trip To The Moon"

Fritz+Lang.jpg

image source: Woman in the Moon/Girl in the Moon/By Rocket to the Moon (1929 Germany 108 mins)

1929 Cartoon Rocket

Fritz+Lang+-+Woman+In+The+Moon+-+1929.+Launch.gif

"Woman in the moon was the first "serious" science fiction film."

"Launch sequence from Fritz Lang's underrated science fiction classic "Woman In The Moon" (Frau Im Mond) from 1929 (A.K.A. "rocket to the moon"). Featuring the talents of Willy Fritsch, Gerda Maurus,Fritz Rasp, and Klaus Pohl. It should be noted that during the third reich, which happened a few years after the movie was made, the Nazis had the models destroyed and the film withdrawn from release. They considered the rocket to be too close to reality. It was after all, designed by none other than Hermann Oberth, one of the fathers of rocketry and astronautics, who was also Wernher Von Braun's teacher, boss and collaborator. A lot of contemporary science went into the making of Woman In The Moon. It shows the very first ever countdown to launch of a rocket. An idea invented as a dramatic device for the movie, but later adopted in real life.  Also depicted for the first time are the use of liquid rocket fuel, a rocket with two stages, and zero gravity in space.  Of course, there were also bad calls, like the submerged launch and the moon atmosphere."

quotes and image source: Fritz Lang - Woman In The Moon - 1929. Launch  • manferot •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8gu1p939a4

Rockets are film artifacts.

"It should be noted that during the third reich, which happened a few years after the movie was made, the Nazis had the models destroyed and the film withdrawn from release. They considered the rocket to be too close to reality. It was after all, designed by none other than Hermann Oberth, one of the fathers of rocketry and astronautics, who was also Wernher Von Braun's teacher, boss and collaborator. A lot of contemporary science went into the making of Woman In The Moon. "

quote and image source: Fritz Lang - Woman In The Moon - 1929. Launch  • manferot •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8gu1p939a4

Cartoons can't really hurt anyone.

Most tend to buy into propaganda myth without critical thought, as we have all been conditioned by the massive multimedia machine, government, religious institution and educational system to do so.

SPECIAL EFFECTS EVOLVE:

From 1902 to World War Two and then on to today, special effects have become easier to create and more believable. Huge rockets and ballistic missiles of governmental military claims would seem to be nothing but visual constructs with little to no basis in reality. These are mental propaganda weapons and not real world examples of scientific study as advertised. Any real science has to do with crowd psychology and special effects research and development. Darkroom photographic magic would lead to the digitally photoshopped world of today. Space X continues a long tradition of fakery.

1945 Cartoon Rocket

4H33czU4Kljeo.gif

Obviously fake, World War Two era, V2  rocket footage.

image source: GERMAN V 2 ROCKET TESTS AND FAILURES w/ Wernher Von Braun 3459  •  PeriscopeFilm  •   https://youtu.be/Ii7uwp1SRIM

NASA+HOAX.jpg

Special effects pioneer Oberth and his assistant von Braun

image source: Hermann Oberth: German Father of Rocketry

Wernher von Braun, Special Effects Assistant

1929's Fritz Lang Film "Woman in The Moon"

"Historically, film scholars and military officials alike praised Woman in the Moon for its startling accuracy of vision. Lang consulted closely with Germany’s leading rocketry expert, Hermann Oberth, and together they visually replicated the rocket described in Oberth’s influential book, Rocket into Interplanetary Space. 40 years prior to the United States’ Apollo 11 lunar landing, Lang’s and Oberth’s predictions as to what such an expedition would require hold amazing scientific legitimacy, lending technical and therefore psychological weight to the film’s lengthy proceedings."

"As part of the film’s publicity, Oberth and his teenage assistant, Werner von Braun, intended to launch an actual rocket to coincide with the film’s Ufa Palace premiere. Though this launch never came to fruition, the two men had long careers in international rocketry: they both went on to become part of Hitler’s V-2 rocket program. When the German military began to develop its program in earnest, the military police confiscated Lang’s scale models, diagrams, and even film prints, treating them all as secrets of the state. (Lang had previously donated all of these elements to the Verein fur Raumschiffarht Rocket Society.) Oberth also went on to technically advise the United States’ first real cinematic prediction of a lunar landing, Destination Moon (1950), which predicted the use of a nuclear-powered rocket."

source: Woman in the Moon • Senses of Cinema  •  Hermann Oberth - Wikipedia

A Trip to the Moon - Wikipedia  •  Woman in the Moon - Wikipedia  •  Hermann Oberth  •  Wernher von Braun


The Only Way Anyone Will Ever Visit "Outer Space" is Virtually

We are supposed to believe that the "Super Powers" of the world possess the capability to precisely fire and control rockets. We are supposed to believe that humanity has possessed the technological know how to precisely place artificial objects into orbit. Now we are supposed to believe that Space X can land rockets like Cold War era science fiction,  "Flash Gordon" style film would.  As it turns out nothing could be further from the truth. "Outer Space" is not a real place and Elon Musk is a modern snake oil salesman, just like his predecessor of sorts, Wernher von Braun, was.

Some 50 years after the make believe Moon landing was promoted as a real time television event, not to be missed, and we still can't wait on lines for rocket rides to low earth orbiting Howard Johnson's motels in the sky. Yet the self proclaimed "Super Powers" of the world claim to possess the ability to precisely catapult satellites and rockets into orbits as distant as Mars and even further...

Most people buy into obvious aerospace and international propaganda lies.

The image below does not represent a real world event and is an example of augmented reality. You will only interact with the place called "Outer Space" by virtual means.

Huge rockets are not real just because we can watch footage of rockets in the sky. The video and film evidence of rockets flying in the sky is proof of nothing.

This highly edited footage looks as fake as the rest of it. Footage of rockets flying in the sky is not evidence of anything but a propaganda campaign.

Huge rockets and ballistic missiles appear to be nothing but a hoax.

2018 Cartoon Rocket

This footage is best described as fake.

First Ever Falcon Heavy Rocket Launch and Landing.gif

MODERN SPACE X CARTOON ROCKET

This does not appear to be real. The exhaust does not even seem to interact with the atmosphere. Space X does a poor job with its special effects work. The launches look like obvious miniatures and the landings are a complete joke. This rocket does not appear to be moving like a real world object in a real atmosphere would. Can you do this at home with a toy model rocket? I bet you can land rockets with virtual means. Get yourself the right software and you can experience a rocket launch for yourself. Computer simulations are no substitute for demonstrable natural principle, but we have been long indoctrinated to truly believe otherwise; most do not see the logical fallacy of the (peer reviewed) computer or mathematical model offered as "proof" and evidence an idea is valid. Math and computer programs are just like sentences and can be used to model and describe both real world phenomena and fantastically fudged musings. Magically controlled rocketry would surely seem to be an example of fantasy.

Space X is a B-Grade Special Effects Studio: A Low Budget Looking Waste of Tax Payers' Money


Special Effect, Composited Rockets Can Only Exist As On Screen Artifacts

image source: First Ever Falcon Heavy Rocket Launch and Landing  •  Cocoa Beach 365  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFmtaEaWMjw&t=34s

Contrived YouTube Video: A Modern Propaganda Artifact

Please note the use of audio. The sound of the crowd is an important element. It reinforces the idea that what we are watching is real. All this actually proves is that we are being exposed to an edited work of art.

source: First Ever Falcon Heavy Rocket Launch and Landing  •  Cocoa Beach 365  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFmtaEaWMjw&t=34s

Edited footage of model rockets prove nothing but a propaganda campaign.

Footage of rockets arcing towards imagined and impossible orbits is as suspect as the rest of the fakery put forth as real. None of this imagery is very credible. Rocket launch footage would seem to be the result of Hollywood style special effects work. The camera is usually, more often than not, able to magically follow the supposedly incredibly high velocity rocket as it ascends into the sky and arcs itself into imagined orbit. The rocket is usually never shown out of focus and the perspective of the rocket usually changes in a very slow manner that suggests the cameraman would need to be Superman in order to fly along with the rocket. Older footage is more revealing as the older special effects work does not hold up to scrutiny when viewed with modern high definition computer tools. The funny thing is one would think that Space X would do a much better job than it does. The older NASA Apollo 11 style launches, while just as fake, and highly edited together, are more impressive special effects and better art work. The Space X work is not quite as impressive and the launches all look like something from old school style "Thomas The Steam Engine" or the "Thunderbirds" programming than anything meant to be taken seriously.

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_the_Tank_Engine  •  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbirds_(TV_series)

MODERN MAGIC FLYING CAMERA EXAMPLE:

source: Spacex heavy Launch (stabilized... mostly)  •  Physics Anonymous  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO8OM_9NyaQ

SPACE X IS FAKE

The older 20th century NASA work, is simply better looking miniature work; but none of it withstands visual scrutiny.

WHITE SAND'S MINIATURES ARE NOT QUITE THAT IMPRESSIVE

1960 Cartoon Rockets

White+Sands+Missile+Range+Tularosa+Frontier+1960+US+Army+The+Big+Picture+TV+470-2.gif

image source: White Sands Missile Range: "Tularosa Frontier" 1960 US Army The Big Picture TV 470  •  Jeff Quitney •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaKcL4JWev8&t=59s


Can you smell what Musk is selling?

"You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly."

quote source: Elon Musk

"Even Elon Musk thinks his space-cruising midnight-cherry Tesla Roadster looks weird."

"It looks so ridiculous and impossible," the SpaceX CEO told reporters after the Falcon Heavy megarocket launched the car into space yesterday (Feb. 6). "You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly."

"Musk went on to say that colors, in general, look strange in space, because "there's no atmospheric occlusion. Everything's too crisp," he said. But what did he mean by this, and is it true that colors in space don't look the same as they do on Earth? " "

absurd apologetic source: https://www.livescience.com/61690-why-spacex-roadster-looks-fake.html

source: Elon Musk on how Falcon Heavy will change space travel  •  The Verge  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7LJIuB2CHE

The Mythic "Genius"

Please note how magically absurd this story is. Elon Musk is a celebrity idol who is meant to act as a social shepherd. His work in the imaginary place called "Outer Space" is meant to define the bounds of the imagination for the mass of humanity. Musk continues the Cold War con job. "Outer Space" is necessary medium needed by the governments of the world to help justify their current tax based incarnations. "Outer Space" is the medium for both the eternal promise of space exploration and colonization that will never really happen, and is also the medium for ballistic missile threat used to justify massive defense spending and the imposition of even more needless taxes.

"In 2001, Musk conceptualized "Mars Oasis"; a project to land a miniature experimental greenhouse on Mars, containing food crops growing on Martian regolith, in an attempt to regain public interest in space exploration In October 2001, Musk travelled to Moscow with Jim Cantrell (an aerospace supplies fixer), and Adeo Ressi (his best friend from college), to buy refurbished Dnepr Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) that could send the envisioned payloads into space. The group met with companies such as NPO Lavochkin and Kosmotras; however, according to Cantrell, Musk was seen as a novice and was consequently spat on by one of the Russian chief designers, and the group returned to the United States empty-handed. In February 2002, the group returned to Russia to look for three ICBMs, bringing along Mike Griffin. Griffin had worked for the CIA's venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel, as well as NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and was just leaving Orbital Sciences, a maker of satellites and spacecraft. The group met again with Kosmotras, and were offered one rocket for US $8 million; however, this was seen by Musk as too expensive; Musk consequently stormed out of the meeting. On the flight back from Moscow, Musk realized that he could start a company that could build the affordable rockets he needed. According to early Tesla and SpaceX investor Steve Jurvetson, Musk calculated that the raw materials for building a rocket actually were only 3 percent of the sales price of a rocket at the time. It was concluded that theoretically, by applying vertical integration and the modular approach from software engineering, SpaceX could cut launch price by a factor of ten and still enjoy a 70-percent gross margin."

"Ultimately, Musk ended up founding SpaceX with the long-term goal of creating a "true spacefaring civilization"."

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk


PANTS ON FIRE WARNING!

MUSK DEFINED:

"musk (n.) late 14c., from Old French musc (13c.) and directly from Late Latin muscus, from Late Greek moskhos, from Persian mushk, from Sanskrit muska-s "testicle," from mus "mouse" (so called, presumably, for resemblance; see muscle). The deer gland was thought to resemble a scrotum. German has moschos, from a Medieval Latin form of the Late Greek word. Spanish has almizcle, from Arabic al misk "the musk," from Persian. Applied to various plants and animals of similar smell (such as musk-ox, 1744)."

source: https://www.etymonline.com/word/musk

A VIRTUAL FUTURE AWAITS US ALL:

One day, if you are lucky, a peer reviewed, computer program will have you convinced that you have traveled to Mars. It is unwise to confuse computer simulations and models with the real thing, but so many of us seem to do exactly that and in this manner we allow underlying assumptions to go unquestioned and we end up getting fooled into believing in things we really should not.

source: Elon Musk's new Mars colonization plan  •  The Verge •   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLYgr2yw88w


The Next Medium For "Outer Space"

Augmented and virtual means are the only way anyone can ever visit the imaginary place known as "Outer Space".

Augmented and virtual reality goggles will be the medium used to visit "Outer Space". 

We are supposed to believe that the international space agencies possess precise control over their rocket technology and we are also supposed to believe men walked in the Moon; yet some fifty years after that televised event, none of us can wait on a line for a rocket ride to a low earth orbiting motel in the sky. We in the public do not get to visit that mythic place they call "Outer Space".

The only way we will interact with or visit "Outer Space" is by virtual means.

DARPA = OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK CREATING VIRTUAL REALITY GEAR, THE INTERNET AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS

source: Apple Smart Glasses - The Future of Wearable Tech!  •  ZONEofTECH  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRyxDsOQhBQ

No Outer Space Means No Justification For DARPA

"The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defenseresponsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military. Originally known as the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the agency was created in February 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in response to the Soviet launching of Sputnik 1 in 1957. Since its inception, the agency's mission is ensuring that the United States avoids further technological surprise. By collaborating with academic, industry, and government partners, DARPA formulates and executes research and development projects to expand the frontiers of technology and science, often beyond immediate U.S. military requirements. DARPA-funded projects have provided significant technologies that influenced many non-military fields, such as computer networking and the basis for the modern Internet, and graphical user interfaces in information technology."

sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA 

"For virtual reality to become more than another quick-to-fade fad like 3-D televisions or the overhyped Google Glass, it needs the type of careful nurturing that only government can give it through long-term developmental investments, a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency program manager told a crowd of VR enthusiasts Monday. While many of the virtual reality applications from the commercial sector come off more like “toy games,” the government is better positioned to foster ideas that take more time to bear fruit, said DARPA’s Trung Tran."

source:  https://www.fedscoop.com/darpa-program-manager-virtual-reality-is-more-than-a-toy/


2018: CAR-TOON

image source: Incase you missed it - Tesla Roadster in Space / SpaceX / 6 Feb 2018  • Cyber Command •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOIq24IS94

TESLA IN FAKE SPACE

"The livestream, which was later viewed by millions of people, cut out after about four and a half hours when cameras' batteries died. Onlookers here on Earth moved on with their lives. But Starman and the Tesla are still out there, and late Tuesday the second-stage engine gave them a final boost, putting them on a path toward orbit around the sun. More than likely, they will remain drifting through the vacuum of space for generations to come. Astronomers have been hard at work pinning down exactly what path they will take."

source: http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/09/technology/future/tesla-orbit-elon-musk-spacex/index.html

SPACE X + BAD SPECIAL EFFECTS =  WASTE OF TAX PAYERS' MONEY

It has always been relatively easy to craft the exact kind of moving image Space X is selling as the real deal. The "Starman" in the Tesla Roadster is supposed to be in "Outer Space". Yet it should be obvious to all who view this imagery that what we are looking at is nothing but a cheap looking special effect. The Earth looks flat and the clouds appear to be completely motionless. This imagery can be created either on a set and done all in camera, or it can be the result of darkroom or photoshop style image compositing. Green screen video and film productions are ubiquitous. Even non science fiction and non super hero video and film productions use green screens. It is unwise to believe what you see on a screen.

"Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear."

source: Incase you missed it - Tesla Roadster in Space / SpaceX / 6 Feb 2018  • Cyber Command •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOIq24IS94


13view_hmd1-630+copy.jpg

NASA: Developing Virtual Reality since at least 1989

1985: NASA's Virtual Visual Environment Display (VIVED)

"During the '80s and '90s, the public was gripped by VR fever. Computer scientist, writer and former Atari researcher Jaron Lanier popularized the term "virtual reality" (VR) to describe the immersion of one's body and mind in an artificial, three-dimensional space, and a variety of products hit the consumer market aimed at connecting people with this new digital environment. But the federally supported R&D sector was where significant investments were made in practical applications for the technology. NASA's Ames Research Center played host to a VR research project launched by Michael McGreevy in 1985 and within a year it was ready to show off a working prototype of its Virtual Visual Environment Display (VIVED) helmet at CES."

"Key developments in simulated environments can be traced back to 1957, when cinematographer Morton Heilig invented the "Sensorama" booth and "Telesphere Mask," where video, sound, vibration and wind were used to replicate a real-world experience. In 1968, Ivan Sutherland went one step further when he built a head-mounted device using mini CRT displays to produce an immersive graphical simulation. It adjusted the user's view inside a 3D environment according to their head movements in the real world."

image and quote source: https://www.engadget.com/2013/12/15/time-machines/

1989+NASA+and+Virtual+Reality.jpg

1989: 20 Years After Apollo 11 and NASA is interested in (military grade) virtual reality research.

source:Applied Virtual Reality Research And Applications at NASA/Marshall ...  •  https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19970006956.pdf

2018: Our Tax Dollars Still Spent On Developing Virtual Reality

DARPA, VIDEO GAMES & VR GEAR

"FOR THE LAST two years, Darpa has been working to make waging cyberwar as easy as playing a video game. Now, like so many other games, it's about to get a lot more in-your-face. At the Pentagon Wednesday, the armed forces' far-out research branch known as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency showed off its latest demos for Plan X, a long-gestating software platform designed to unify digital attack and defense tools into a single, easy-to-use interface for American military hackers. And for the last few months, that program has had a new toy: The agency is experimenting with using the Oculus Rift virtual-reality headset to give cyberwarriors a new way to visualize three-dimensional network simulations–in some cases with the goal of better targeting them for attack."

source: https://www.wired.com/2014/05/darpa-is-using-oculus-rift-to-prep-for-cyberwar/

NASA+VR+GEar.jpg

The Nature of Things: 'Masters of Space' 

OUTER SPACE: A NEW ARENA FOR WAR

"Just over fifty years ago, the first satellite was spun into orbit. Space filled us with optimism and awe. But were we in fact just staking out a new war zone? Space weapons feature prominently in science fiction, but how close are we to seeing real weapons systems in space? Today, 1000 active satellites are officially recorded as circling the earth. Most countries use satellite technology. And 45 nations own their own orbiting satellites. By shutting down a few satellites, the infrastructure of an entire country or continent can be paralyzed. Now, the United States is the Master of Space. It dominates as the owner and user of space systems, both civilian and military. "Full spectrum dominance" - control and dominance of land, sea, air and, more recently, space, is still the goal of some within the U.S. Defense Department. But what are the realities behind these aims? Trying to track down what the Defense Department is spending on space weapons projects is a tricky business. When Hitler had the first V2 missile launched in 1944, the weapons race in space officially began. Masters of Space is the saga of the emerging competition between the major industrial nations to control space and the fine line between space-faring and space warfare. With unprecedented access to present and former US military personnel, and insights from anti-weapons activists, as well as military analysts,"

"Masters of Space explores space as a "new arena for war".

http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natur... http://www.afspc.af.mil/ - US Space Command

quote and video source: Masters of Space - 2010 The Nature of Things, CBC - 1 of 3  •  Reality Expansion  •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtYQMQI1NIs


Miniature Rockets and Hollywood Style Special Effects Are Not Real World Threats

Ballistic missile and space rockets can only exist as art of some kind. This is what the evidence we can actually examine indicates. All the evidence indicates that the rocket programs of the world are part of a long standing internationally conducted propaganda campaign. The world has long been run as one business empire from behind the scenes as anyone who has actually read the fine print of history and governmental documentation, understands. If you have any questions, see the article index, or website navigation bar, for more.


NO CONTRIVED "OUTER SPACE" COLD WAR MEANS NO DARPA

OUR TAX MONEY AT WORK FUNDING  PRODUCTS WE WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR

DARPA FUNDS RESEARCH INTO WHAT BECOMES CONSUMER ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY

"Inside a plain red granite building in Arlington, Virginia, the high-tech, low-profile minds at DARPA aim to make the seemingly unimaginable routine. While the agency acts as a clearinghouse for hundreds of blue-sky projects in development and has a massive budget, DARPA tends to stay under the radar. Yet it’s been in business for since 1958: The agency was one-half of Eisenhower’s response to the Sputnik challenge. NASA was the other half. Both agencies were given the same urgent brief: Regain our technological lead and keep it."

"NASA was making big news launching satellites and manned space flights, while DARPA was quietly creating ARPANET, a decentralized communication system designed to protect the flow of information among scientists. That project is now better known as the Internet."

"Siri, the iPhone’s smart voice-recognition system, was born in a government laboratory. The disembodied voice that plays your music and gets you directions (frequently to the wrong place) was developed as part of a massive DARPA-funded program called Cognitive Assistant that Learns and Organizes. The original idea was to create a digital assistant that would learn over time, adapting the patterns of users and acting – more or less – as Robin to every American solider’s Batman. SRI International, the company that kept working on the project after federal funding ran out, eventually building Siri herself, was purchased by Apple in 2010. That vision was never realized, but now we can all call home without using our fingers. Not bad for government work."

"The first efforts made by DARPA anticipated Google Maps by employing cars outfitted with cameras to drive around urban areas taking enough pictures to enable a digital walk-through. Since then, things have gotten even more outlandish. Two years ago, DARPA announced it had created the Urban Photonic Sandtable Display, a 360-degree 3-D holographic display designed to assist battle planners. The technology, which does not require glasses, is completely interactive, allowing users to rotate the display and zoom in on specific details. Created by Zebra Imaging, the technology looks as though it was inspired by ‘Avatar,’ but research and development was under way long before that 3-D blockbuster hit the screens."

source: https://www.mensjournal.com/gear/darpas-greatest-inventions-20140108/


What about communication satellites?

They were never needed and are part of the historical, international, hoax. Orbiting space satellites are not real.

Skywave+copy.jpg

The Skywave:

"In radio communication, skywave or skip refers to the propagation of radio waves reflected or refracted back toward Earth from the ionosphere, an electrically charged layer of the upper atmosphere. Since it is not limited by the curvature of the Earth, skywave propagation can be used to communicate beyond the horizon, at intercontinental distances. It is mostly used in the shortwave frequency bands. Amateur radio operators are credited with the discovery of skywave propagation on the shortwave bands. Early long-distance services used surface wave propagation at very low frequencies, which are attenuated along the path. Longer distances and higher frequencies using this method meant more signal attenuation. This, and the difficulties of generating and detecting higher frequencies, made discovery of shortwave propagation difficult for commercial services.Radio amateurs conducted the first successful transatlantic tests in December 1921, operating in the 200 meter mediumwave band (1500 kHz)—the shortest wavelength then available to amateurs. In 1922 hundreds of North American amateurs were heard in Europe at 200 meters and at least 30 North American amateurs heard amateur signals from Europe."

"The first two-way communications between North American and Hawaiian amateurs began in 1922 at 200 meters. Although operation on wavelengths shorter than 200 meters was technically illegal (but tolerated as the authorities mistakenly believed at first that such frequencies were useless for commercial or military use), amateurs began to experiment with those wavelengths using newly available vacuum tubes shortly after World War I."

Four+Minutes+of+BBC+TV+from+1938.gif

British BBC Television signal received in New York City in 1938

"The four-minute compilation from 1938 exists only because of a technological fluke and the enthusiasm of two television buffs, one in Britain and the other in America where, thanks to freak atmospheric conditions, it was picked up and recorded on a cine camera placed in front of a television screen as the images came in."

"Due to freak atmospheric conditions, a BBC TV broadcast is received in New York City. A film camera is used to record the silent images which included the performance of a play, a cartoon, and other matter. A four-minute excerpt from this filmed recording survives and is ..."

images and quotes sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave  •  1938 in television - Wikipedia   •   BBC Television received in New York - November 1938 : Alexandra ...

Click here for more: Artificial Satellites Do Not Exist Part One: The Telstar Hoax — A Proper ...


1957: COLD WAR SPACE RACE BEGINS

No Cold War era threat means no tax based funding for more layers of needless government, It also means no DARPA and governmentally funded research into what would become the internet.

quote and video source: USSR SPACECRAFTS VISION IN 1957, Road to the stars,VERY RARE PART 1  •  Dan Beaumont Space Museum •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZJPRHbN15M  


THE NEXT ARTICLE IN THIS SERIES WILL EXAMINE THE ORIGINS OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE HOAX

(COMING SOON)

"An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a guided ballistic missile with a minimum range of 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi) primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more thermonuclear warheads). Similarly, conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness, but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target."

"The development of the world's first practical design for an ICBM, A9/10, intended for use in bombing New York and other American cities, was undertaken in Nazi Germany by the team of Wernher von Braun under Projekt Amerika. The ICBM A9/A10 rocket initially was intended to be guided by radio, but was changed to be a piloted craft after the failure of Operation Elster. The second stage of the A9/A10 rocket was tested a few times in January and February 1945. The progenitor of the A9/A10 was the German V-2 rocket, also designed by von Braun and widely used at the end of World War II to bomb British and Belgian cities. All of these rockets used liquid propellants. Following the war, von Braun and other leading German scientists were relocated to the United States to work directly for the US Army through Operation Paperclip, developing the IRBMs, ICBMs, and launchers. This technology was also predicted by US Army General Hap Arnold, who wrote in 1943: Someday, not too distant, there can come streaking out of somewhere – we won't be able to hear it, it will come so fast – some kind of gadget with an explosive so powerful that one projectile will be able to wipe out completely this city of Washington."

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercontinental_ballistic_missile

source: Atlas ICBM Missile Flight Plan Animation ~ 1957 Convair Division, General Dynamics  • Jeff Quitney •  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e9XdEmZZG8

COLD WAR FAKERY CONTINUES TO THIS DAY

"In the immediate post-war era, the US and USSR both started rocket research programs based on the German wartime designs, especially the V-2. In the US, each branch of the military started its own programs, leading to considerable duplication of effort. In the USSR, rocket research was centrally organized, although several teams worked on different designs. Early designs from both countries were short-range missiles, like the V-2, but improvements quickly followed."

"In the USSR early development was focused on missiles able to attack European targets. This changed in 1953 when Sergei Korolyovwas directed to start development of a true ICBM able to deliver newly developed hydrogen bombs. Given steady funding throughout, the R-7 developed with some speed. The first launch took place on 15 May 1957 and led to an unintended crash 400 km (250 mi) from the site. The first successful test followed on 21 August 1957; the R-7 flew over 6,000 km (3,700 mi) and became the world's first ICBM. The first strategic-missile unit became operational on 9 February 1959 at Plesetsk in north-west Russia. It was the same R-7 launch vehicle that placed the first artificial satellite in space, Sputnik, on 4 October 1957. The first human spaceflight in history was accomplished on a derivative of R-7, Vostok, on 12 April 1961, by Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. A heavily modernized version of the R-7 is still used as the launch vehicle for the Soviet/Russian Soyuz spacecraft, marking more than 60 years of operational history of Sergei Korolyov's original rocket design."

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercontinental_ballistic_missile

Wernher von Braun and the V2 Rocket, Project Paperclip Hoax examined – The Origins of Modern Ballistic Missile Threat

4H33czU4Kljeo.gif

Obviously fake, World War Two era, cartoon V2  rocket footage.

image source: GERMAN V 2 ROCKET TESTS AND FAILURES w/ Wernher Von Braun 3459  •  PeriscopeFilm  •   https://youtu.be/Ii7uwp1SRIM

COMING SOON: EXAMINING THE BALLISTIC MISSILE HOAX

Huge rocketry and ballistic missiles appear to be special effect artifacts designed to promote a Governmental propaganda agenda. The Cold War is alive and well. Most people seem to buy into internationally promoted mythology marketed as real science and history. The truth is that a lot of what many of us think is real is not. University education is more indoctrination than actual mental enlightenment. Students are Pavlovian conditioned with grades to parrot back officially sanctioned secular catechism that reinforce Governmental based propaganda agendas designed to shape and mold public behavior and the collective public mind. Peer review is a form of peer pressure and a form of mass social pressure based psychological manipulation. A huge clue that someone is not a true authority and that a subject is not a real area of study or demonstrable science, is the fact that the so-called "expert" or "authority" cannot actually demonstrate what they are explaining. Highly edited video and film "documentaries" offered as evidence are not proof of anything but a propaganda campaign. Governmental video product is not evidence; it is the equivalent of visual gossip. Highly edited News packages and other forms of governmental film and video productions are claims, not evidence, but we have been long conditioned and indoctrinated to really believe otherwise.

Ballistically Threatening Models: Live Action "Lunar-Toon" Rockets

Meddings-miniature set up (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: http://nzpetesmatteshot.blogspot.com/2010/07/meddings-magic-miniatures-journey-to.html

DON'T PANIC!

Big bad guided missiles are fake. Hollywood special effects can't destroy entire countries or cities.

russian-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-rs-20-1508853204 (0.00.00.00).jpg

Continuous Cold War – Miniature Ballistic Missile Propaganda 2017:

"The missile, also known as RS-28 Sarmat, is capable of beating any defences and wiping out entire countries."

"Russia to soon test ‘Satan 2’ ballistic missile with payload that could 'wipe out UK, France or Texas' The missile, also known as RS-28 Sarmat, is capable of beating any defences and wiping out entire countries. Russia will soon carry out the test launch of its 100-tonne 'Satan 2' ballistic missile that will be powerful enough to obliterate 'an area the size of France'. The missile, also known as RS-28 Sarmat, is capable of beating any defences and wiping out entire countries, Daily Mail quoted Russia’s military as saying. The missile, in pipelines since 2009, is now ready for test after several failures with initial trials likely to be carried out before the end of the year. Daily Mail added in its report that the launches will be held at the Plesetsk testing ground in west Russia. If the tests prove successful, the weapon could be in use by 2019-20.  The missile is capable of delivering warheads of 40 megatons - 2,000 times as powerful as the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. "

image and quote source:  October 2017, India TV News Desk, New Delhi • https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/world-russia-to-soon-test-satan-2-ballistic-missile-that-could-wipe-out-uk-france-or-texas-408219

preface-2 (0.00.00.00).jpg
irs-logo (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: Our Hard Earned Wages

BOO! BE SCARED & PAY YOUR TAXES!

Plato Shadow Cave Bogeyman threats have always been used to generate needless patriotic sentiment. We have to have faith that we need to pay taxes for governmental protection from international bogeyman threats. The truth is that the world has long been run as one world-wide banking enterprise and governments tend to represent international banking interests more than actually representing the will of the people as has been long advertised. The fact of the matter is that all the World is literally a scripted stage and high level political leaders are role playing actors who actually do play out scripted soap opera narratives sold as "News". Yellow journalistic practice is the true blueprint for human culture. Images of wars and images of existential threats have always been used to keep the mass of humanity truly believing in the need to keep paying for all the layers of illusory protection we do not need.

The V2 ballistic missile hoax would lead to the equally fake international space programs of today.

gulliver-pindar-lilliput-troops (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: Gulliver's Travels • http://4umi.com/swift/gulliver/lilliput/3

Cartoon, miniature rockets can't hurt anyone.

By the way, orbits are impossible. Newton's work is nonsense.

Newton+Wrong-1-1.gif

Newton's Cannonball can do nothing but fall.

Newton's could do no real experiment; his was a fallacious thought experiment that ignores demonstrable reality.

Real world ballistic physics and real world centrifugal effect show us why Newton's orbits are nonsense.

The imagined cannonball dropped from imagined mountain height or fired from cannon, will strike the Earth's surface with accelerated velocity at the same time. The horizontal motion is demonstrably independent from the vertical and accelerated (apparent) pull of gravitational effect.

1/16th of the Assumed Circumference of Earth

Imagined cannonball or equally imagined International Space Station can do nothing but fall within about five minutes time after only traveling about 1.400 miles or 1/16th the assumed circumference of the Earth.*

When we plug the numbers in, when we use the actual assumed value for the circumference of the Earth and we use the assumed velocity of either Newton's imagined cannonball or imagined International Space Station, and we use real world gravity, with its real world accelerated effect, we can easily see that orbits are impossible. In about five minutes time, the imagined cannonball or space station would strike the surface of the Earth. Of course this assumes the world lacks an atmosphere, but you get the idea. Newton was wrong, the falling apple is nothing like the rising and setting Moon.

* Numbers are all approximate; the Earth's circumference is supposed to be about 24,000 miles.

(The orbital path of the imagined International Space Station is supposed to be something like 26,000 mile circumference, by comparison.)

Newton's orbital equations do not model real world phenomena.

Read Newton for yourself:

Sir Isaac's work is hypothesis-less mathematical fiction only. Sir Isaac Newton's math does not model demonstrable reality. All real world physics prove Newton wrong.

Sir Isaac's illustration is misleading, to say the least, and his orbital "theory" admittedly lacks hypothesis and is simply mathematical fiction. Nobody can do an experiment to prove this absurd idea correct. Bodies do not magically fall in circles around other bodies. Fallacious peer reviewed mathematical equation is no substitute for actual empirical evidence. Demonstrable natural reality clearly shows us that the falling apple is nothing like the rising and setting Moon. Newton's art work is nonsense and not science at all. It does not take into account the real circumference of the Earth. The above animated gif is what would happen and is what Newton's claim actually would look like. The illustration below does not represent anything real. It is propaganda, Newton uses fallaciously reasoned mathematical equation in the same way liars use sentences.

"We said in a mathematical way, to avoid all questions about the nature or quality of this force which we would not be understood to determine by any hypothesis;"

quote source: Sir Isaac Newton page 512 Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive  •  https://archive.org/details/newtonspmathema00newtrich

Full article link: Newton Was Wrong: Orbits Do Not Exist

Newton+Wrong-1+(0.00.00.00).jpg

source : pages 512 and 513 Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive  •  https://archive.org/details/newtonspmathema00newtrich

No Hypothesis, Illogically Premised, Mathematical Fantasy, "Scientific Theory"

"We said in a mathematical way, to avoid all questions about the nature or quality of this force which we would not be understood to determine by any hypothesis; and therefore call it by the general name of a centripetal force, as it is a force which is directed towards some centre; and as it regards more particularly a body in that centre, we call it circum-solar, circum-terrestrial, circum-jovial; and in like manner in respect of other celestial bodies."

quote source: Sir Isaac Newton page 512 Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive  •  https://archive.org/details/newtonspmathema00newtrich

The word "hypothesis" as Sir Isaac would have meant it:

"hypothesis (n.) 1590s, "a particular statement;" 1650s, "a proposition, assumed and taken for granted, used as a premise," from Middle French hypothese and directly from Late Latin hypothesis, from Greek hypothesis "base, groundwork, foundation," hence in extended use "basis of an argument, supposition," literally "a placing under," from hypo- "under" (see hypo-) + thesis "a placing, proposition" (from reduplicated form of PIE root *dhe- "to set, put"). A term in logic; narrower scientific sense is from 1640s."

source: hypothesis | Origin and meaning of hypothesis by Online Etymology ...

 

1.430 Miles Relative To Earth's Supposed Curvature

The imagined speed of 17,170 mph of equally imagined International Space Station works out to about 286.16 miles a minute or about 1,430 miles in five minutes. In that amount of time the space station would fall some 248 or so miles towards the Earth's surface. Please keep in mind that the International Space Station is supposed to be some 249 or so miles up in the sky. The International Space Station is also supposed to be subjected to about 90% of Earth's gravitational influence.

"The International Space Station orbits Earth at an altitude between 200 and 250 miles. At that altitude, Earth's gravity is about 90 percent of what it is on the planet's surface"

source: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/.../what-is-microgravity-58.html

Compare Newton's Fallacious Illustration To The Supposed Curvature of The Earth:

1,000 and 2,000 Miles Relative To Earth's Supposed Curvature

earth-curve-calcuation+2.jpg

Newton's imagined cannonball and equally imaginative space station can do nothing but fall after only covering a small portion of the Earth's curved surface.

The projectile would need to travel at around 24,000 miles a second for Newton's artistically rendered concept to even begin to make sense; if this were even possible, there would still be other problems. 

image source: image source: Automated Calculator for Earth Curvature

ORBITS DO NOT EXIST

Real world values reveal that the imagined cannonball or equally imagined International Space Station, with equally imagined fantastic velocity of some 17,170 mph, cannot even begin to approach "falling around the Earth's curve", as advertised. Falling would be towards supposed Earth's center, and cannot be demonstrated to be a circular phenomena, but NASA and other International space agencies, and the university system claim otherwise, so it must be so. Down can be defined as up with peer reviewed accuracy. Pavlovian parroting is what passes for "genius". Absurd so-called theories that put forth contradictory concepts that need seemingly eternal ad hoc patching, are sold as the work of "genius"; too many of us buy into this kind of obvious mythology with little to no critical thought. The official explanation for so-called "weightlessness" and orbits is absurd. It also lacks any basis in the real world. It's not like Newton (or anyone else) could do an actual experiment in the actual world to demonstrate orbits. The evidence we do have to examine, comes in the form of what appears to be obviously contrived and deceptive audio and visual based propaganda. Highly edited footage of what appears to be miniature rocket special effects is evidence only of some kind of public relations campaign. It's been about 50 years since the televised Moon Walk and none of us in the public can actually wait on lines to go to that mythic place they call "Outer Space". There is no reason to accept unreason as "scientific fact".

"...the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth..."

"An orbiting spacecraft moves at the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. Because of this, the spacecraft keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. As a result, they fall around the planet. The moon stays in orbit around Earth for this same reason. The moon also is falling around Earth."

source: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-microgravity-58.html

"The International Space Station travels in orbit around Earth at a speed of roughly 17,150 miles per hour (that's about 5 miles per second!). This means that the Space Station orbits Earth (and sees a sunrise) once every 92 minutes!"

source: How fast does the Space Station travel? | Cool Cosmos

EARTH CIRCUMFERENCE = 24,901 MILES

Earth's supposed radius is 3,959 miles.

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 12.34.44 PM.jpg

image source: http://truthrising.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/earth-curve-calcuation.jpg

NEWTON'S ORBITAL CLAIM CAN ONLY FAIL

When we plug in the real numbers. When we use the actual value for Earth's supposed circumference, and we take gravity's accelerated effect into account, like we should, we see that Newton fibbed, to say the least. The orbital work of  this so-called "Genius" mathematician, who supposedly developed the mathematics that would evolve into calculus, does not live up to its mythic reputation.

At even 17,170 mph, the imagined cannonball would only travel a small portion of the Earth's surface before hitting the ground.

The cannonball cannot be mathematically shown to follow any kind of orbit, not without fudging. One quarter of the Earth's circumference is about 6,000 miles, the cannonball would fall to the Earth's surface in the amount of time it takes the cannonball to travel about 1400 miles, or a little less than 1/4 of 6000 miles. Newton's artwork is not to scale or in proportion. The mountain itself is absurdly titanic in size. We would not be able to actually see the tallest mountain. Newtonian orbits are not real and not based in anything truly demonstrable. Orbits are mathematical fantasy.

We are sub-atomic in size compared to the supposed curvature of the Earth, and so are our largest buildings and, so is even Mt. Everest.

The cannonball would not travel past the letter "E" in the artwork below.

V = Newton's Imagined 500 Mile High Mountain

source: page 513 Newton's Principia : the mathematical principles of ... - Internet Archive  •  https://archive.org/details/newtonspmathema00newtrich

Newton's Work is Self Contradictory

Some of it is based on demonstrable real world physics and some of it is based on illogically premised metaphysical musings backed with equally illogically premised mathematics.

CAnnon+Ball+Newton+Wrong.jpg

image source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/Characteristics-of-a-Projectile-s-Trajectory

"The International Space Station travels in orbit around Earth at a speed of roughly 17,150 miles per hour (that's about 5 miles per second!). This means that the Space Station orbits Earth (and sees a sunrise) once every 92 minutes!"

source: How fast does the Space Station travel? | Cool Cosmos

 

NASA's OFFICIAL EXPLANATION IS NONSENSE:

When we plug in all the real world values and use real demonstrable physics as our model, we can see that the International Space Station could do nothing but fall. It can never fall around the curvature of the Earth, in the first place. Orbital "theory" conveniently ignores the fact that gravity pulls bodies towards what is supposed to be the center of the Earth, when it needs to. Falling is not around the Earth. Ballistic physics demonstrates that the fixed horizontal velocity of a projectile is independent from the accelerated gravitational pull. This is what real world science clearly demonstrates.

"An orbiting spacecraft moves at the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. Because of this, the spacecraft keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. As a result, they fall around the planet. The moon stays in orbit around Earth for this same reason. The moon also is falling around Earth."

source: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-microgravity-58.html

Even at some 17,000 mph, the International Space Station could do nothing but fall for about five minutes before striking the Earth's surface (I am ignoring atmosphere, but you should get the idea.

 

REAL WORLD BALLISTIC PHYSICS PROVE NEWTON WRONG: ORBITS DO NOT EXIST

Bodies cannot fall in circles: The perpendicular components of motion are independent of each other.

Falling is supposed to be towards a center of mass, in this case the Earth.  Bodies do not fall in circles like NASA and the international space agencies claim.

DROPPED OR SHOT: CANNONBALL STRIKES GROUND IN THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME

Newton+Wrong.jpg

"The vertical force acts perpendicular to the horizontal motion and will not affect it since perpendicular components of motion are independent of each other. Thus, the projectile travels with a constant horizontal velocity and a downward vertical acceleration."

image and quote source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/Characteristics-of-a-Projectile-s-Trajectory


Newton's Concept is Nonsense: The Official "Scientific" Explanation for Orbits is Absurd

"An orbiting spacecraft moves at the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. Because of this, the spacecraft keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. As a result, they fall around the planet. The moon stays in orbit around Earth for this same reason. The moon also is falling around Earth."

source: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-microgravity-58.html

Do you believe you can fall in circles?

When we plug the real world numbers in, we see that the above statement is nothing but nonsense and not science by any stretch of the imagination. Objects demonstrably fall with accelerated velocity towards what would be the center of the Earth, apples and real world physical objects cannot fall in magical imaginary circles or ellipses around the Earth. Newton's orbital work is nothing but fantasy.

"The vertical force acts perpendicular to the horizontal motion and will not affect it since perpendicular components of motion are independent of each other. Thus, the projectile travels with a constant horizontal velocity and a downward vertical acceleration."

source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/Characteristics-of-a-Projectile-s-Trajectory

GRAVITY'S ACCELERATED EFFECT: BODIES THAT GO UP COME BACK DOWN AGAIN

u3l2a2 (0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/What-is-a-Projectile

Gravity is an accelerated effect and Newton did no real experiment to prove his orbital musings correct.

Sir Isaac's work was based on an illogically premised thought experiment that defies demonstrable ballistic physics.

A dropped objects gains speed as it falls. A dropped cannonball would strike the Earth's surface in the same amount of time whether fired from the cannon or dropped from cannon barrel height.

The horizontal and vertical motions are independent from each other. One cannot effect the other. Objects cannot fall in circles around other physical bodies. Falling is towards what is supposed to be the Earth's center, and falling is an accelerated velocity. The speed of a projectile like a cannonball or imagined space station, is supposed to be set at a fixed velocity, This what real world, demonstrable physical principle reveals. We have no logical reason to buy into Newtonian orbital mechanics. The accelerated falling apple proves Newton wrong.

One Second = 5 meters distance fallen (total 5 meters)

Two Seconds = 15 meters distance fallen (total 20 meters)

Three Seconds = 25 meters distance fallen (total 45 meters)*

* all numbers are rounded up

links: Free fall (distance and velocity) Calculator - High accuracy calculation  •  http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/What-is-a-Projectile

 

Gravity Calculator

NEWTON+FAILS.jpg

You can use the free fall calculator for yourself: http://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224835316

WITHIN A LITTLE OVER FIVE MINUTES THE SPACE STATION WOULD FALL TO THE GROUND

The ISS is imagined to be some 250 miles up in the sky in orbit around the Earth.

This does not take atmosphere into account. The point is, what goes up comes down and all real world science clearly demonstrates why Newton's orbital musings are nothing but fantasy.

All the supposed "Outer Space" footage is nothing but (obvious) Hollywood Film and CGI style fakery and visual illusion and nothing more.

Weight is the apparent pull or push towards Earth's center, with accelerated effect, if dropped. Objects and people cannot fall around the Earth. The Moon rises and sets, just like the Sun does, for example, and neither are like the proverbial falling apple. Sir Isaac Newton's musings are nonsense. Bodies cannot magically defy gravity and fall in ellipses and circles around other bodies. Centrifugal effect and all demonstrable ballistic physics show us why Newton's orbital musings are nothing but nonsense. Sir Isaac Newton admits to having no hypothesis for his orbital musings. None of this was ever real science.

Math is a tool.

Math is a tool. Math is also a language and has all the same limits that language does. Math can be used to model real world phenomena and math can be used to model gibberish. The orbital works of people like Kepler, Newton and Einstein are examples of math being used to model gibberish.

 

Math can be used to model real world, demonstrable ballistic physics.

Real world ballistic physics prove Newton wrong.

bds.gif

"...perpendicular components of motion are independent of each other..."

"According to Newton's law of inertia, an object in motion in a horizontal direction would continue in its horizontal motion with the same horizontal speed and direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced horizontal force. The animation above shows a green sphere moving to the right at constant speed. The horizontal distance traveled in each second is a constant value. The red sphere undergoes a vertically accelerated motion which is typical of an object upon which only the force of gravity acts. If these two motions are combined - vertical free fall motion and constant horizontal motion - then the trajectory will be that of a parabola. An object which begins with an initial horizontal velocity and is acted upon only by the force of gravity will follow the path of the blue sphere. It will travel the same horizontal distance in each consecutive second but will fall vertically a greater distance in each consecutive second. The result is a parabolic path as shown in the animation above."

image and quote source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/vectors/bds.cfm  •  http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-2/Initial-Velocity-Components

Newtonian Intellectual Bait and Switch

Some of Newton's so-called "laws" make sense and some do not. Inertia is demonstrable and makes sense. Orbital "theory" is not based on real world physical principle and does not make any sense at all. In fact, it defies the actual and immutable direction of accelerated gravitational effect. Nature does not need "laws" nor math. Laws and math are human constructs and should not be confused with Natural reality.

 
NEWTON WRONG

"The Inertia of Planets and Comets"

"The Birth of A New Physics" Supplement 12 Page 222

"Newton's statement that the motion of planets and of comets illustrates the principle of inertia may seem puzzling, since their motion is curved. Newton expected his readers to understand that such motion had two components: a linear inertial motion along the tangent to the curve,and a continual accelerated motion "of falling" toward the center (centripetal) that keeps the motion along the curve rather than flying off on a tangent. Since the motions of the planets and comets has continued for a very long time (undiminished by friction), and is likely to continue for a long time, the tangential component of their orbital motion provides the best example of inertial motion that continues on and on without sensible diminution. Terrestrial motions, such as those of projectiles, are not good examples because such motions are slowed down by air friction and do not last very long since all projectiles eventually fall down to the ground."

image and quote source: "The Birth of a New Physics" By I. Bernard Cohen

Unexamined Presumptions & Circular Reasoning Apologetics Are Not Real Science

The above statement shows the circular reasoning of the university indoctrinated and peer reviewed, Pavlovian conditioned mind. As we can see for ourselves, when we use all real world values, and we ignore the atmosphere and assume perfect (magical) vacuum, like Newton does, we can demonstrate that Newton's cannonball thought experiment can do nothing but prove his orbital musings wrong. What Newton does is explicitly ignore all demonstrable real world physics in favor of his heliocentric preference, which has no basis in the real world. What Newton does is pick and choose when real world physical principle applies and when it does not. The a priori assumption that Newton "proves" is that the rising and setting celestial lights are like falling apples. He proves this without any hypothesis and with illogical mathematics and we are told this is "science". As we can read for ourselves, there is no experiment to support the concept of orbits. All real world physical experiments demonstrate why orbits cannot exist.

"Newtonian principles of celestial mechanics guide our artificial satellites, our space shuttles, and every spacecraft we launch to explore the vast reaches of our solar system."

source: "The Birth of A New Physics" Chapter 7 "The Grand Design – A New Physics"  Page 148

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Birth_of_a_New_Physics.html?id=KYChaSaReN8C&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=false

 

Following Imagined Paths

In order for the cannonball to be fired in a straight line, as the red arrow (v) path indicates, from the 12 o'clock position, the cannon would actually have to be aimed up and would not be aimed at the horizon, as this model, the model of Sir Isaac, assumes a globe shaped Earth. The "v'" path would mean the cannonball would no longer have a perfectly perpendicular relationship with gravity.

This would be like firing a cannon at an angle greater than 90 degrees. This would be like firing a cannon that is slightly pointed up at the sky. Gravity itself would begin to resist the cannonball and would slowly begin to minutely reduce its speed. As the cannonball progressed, the effect of gravity would only increase. Would this not seem to require an incredible amount of energy? Consider how sub-atomically small we are relative to it all. Consider how small even imagined huge rockets would be relative to the size of it all.

NEWTON WRONG.jpg

Gravitational Acceleration Direction "A" vs Inertial Path "V"

THE RED ARROW (V) = IMAGINED, GRAVITY-FREE, STRAIGHT, INERTIAL (FIXED VELOCITY), PATH

Orbits are imaginary.

Orbits need not make sense. Orbital theory can be logically problematic and internally inconsistent. The equal sign acts like magic spell and common sense and demonstrable real world science can be ignored.

Peer reviewed math that models nothing real should not be taken seriously. Imaginary experiments and fake "Outer Space" footage is all we are offered as proof that orbits are real.

The falling apple proves Newton wrong. The rising and setting Moon and other celestial lights are not like falling apples and falling rocks.

images source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_mechanics

 

WE SHOULD BE SKEPTICAL OF CLAIMS LIKE THIS:

"An orbiting spacecraft moves at the right speed so the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. Because of this, the spacecraft keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. As a result, they fall around the planet. The moon stays in orbit around Earth for this same reason. The moon also is falling around Earth."

source: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-microgravity-58.html

Falling is towards what is supposed to be Earth's center or even a shared center of mass. Falling is not in circles.

When we look at Newtonian orbital claims to scale we can see why this so-called "theory" fails.

Please click here for more: Newton Was Wrong: Orbits Do Not Exist


THE SOLAR SYSTEM TO SCALE

Solar+system+to+scale.jpg

image source: image source: To Scale:

The Solar System Model To Scale

The heliocentric based model to scale and in proportion is an absurd model that is comprised of mostly empty space.

Please click here for more: ORBITS DO NOT EXIST: THE SOLAR SYSTEM MODEL TO SCALE


1512009520922+(0.00.00.00).jpg

image source: https://archive-media-1.nyafuu.org/bant/image/1512/00/1512009520922.jpg

UP NEXT: THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION HOAX - BUSTED

The next blog article posting will address the International Space Station hoax.

The inconsistent sighting times of the ISS will be examined. Is the light in the sky a natural shooting star like phenomena? Is it a high flying military passenger jet? The falling apple with accelerated velocity and real world ballistic physics demonstrate why the International Space Station is not a football field sized artificial satellite. The history of the discovery of planets and other possible "moons" of Earth will also be examined. The heliocentric model is not the elegant theory of university educational advertisement and this too will be the subject of the next article I publish.

Despite the "equal and opposite" catechism of Newtonian orbital mechanical marketing claims, the falling apple is nothing at all like the rising and setting Moon. Physical, real world, bodies like apples and rocks do not float about the heavens. These bodies do not fly in magical circles. Nor can they magically "fall" in merry go round circular fashion around other physical bodies. No physical experiment can demonstrate orbits. Nobody has ever used magnets and metal spheres to emulate Newtonian orbits. Newton's work in this area can only exist in the imagination. It can only be given virtual form by means of fallaciously reasoned mathematical equation. An equal sign is not a magic mind warping spell, and yet too many of us really do seem to fall for this sleight of mind kind of peer reviewed "proof".  Yes the consensus opinion can be wrong, and as it turns out, in our world, it often is. Modern science is a lot less settled than advertised. Mathematical models that are simply based upon ad hoc reasoned apologetics have replaced both demonstrable science and common sense. The Pavlovian environment of the educational system and the subsequent career based financial reward incentives, conditions most of us to believe in ideas and so-called "scientific theories" we really should be very skeptical of. Too much of what is presented as modern science is actually very illogical metaphysics with no basis in reality. Mathematical models of very unreal ideas have long replaced demonstrable reality. All supposed evidence and proof for things like the heliocentric model of the Universe are not as they seem. These claims do not live up to advertising myth and hype. All common sense explanations are ignored in favor of even the most absurd ideas, as long as these ideas support the mainstream "scientific" narrative.

The Ptolemaic Model Is Not The Complicated Mess We Are Told It Is

"As an indication of exactly how good the Ptolemaic model is, modern planetariums are built using gears and motors that essentially reproduce the Ptolemaic model for the appearance of the sky as viewed from a stationary Earth. In the planetarium projector, motors and gears provide uniform motion of the heavenly bodies. One motor moves the planet projector around in a big circle, which in this case is the deferent, and another gear or motor takes the place of the epicycle."

source: http://www.polaris.iastate.edu/EveningStar/Unit2/unit2_sub1.htm

Newton+Wrong.jpg

image source: Logarithmic spiral - Wikipedia

The Heliocentric Model Was Always The More Complicated Model

The lights in the sky are not best described as rocks.

The basic Ptolemaic, Geocentric model of the Universe is the one that best describes the world we actually witness and experience. All supposed evidence to the contrary is frankly fudged. Modern cosmology is a secular religion. It a a governmentally promoted faith for post modern times. Modern science is supposed to have all the answers and have the origins of the Life, the Universe and Everything, all figured out. The truth is that nothing could be further from the truth. The ad hoc patchwork of conflicting ideas sold as modern scientific cosmology with absurd Big Bang origins and black hole and quantum foaming dark matter nonsense would not exist were the work of Einstein as valid as advertised. Einstein's fantastic imaginings would not have been needed if Sir Isaac Newton had it right. If Kepler had it correct, we'd have never heard of Newton and if Copernicus had it right, we'd never even need to know about Kepler or Tycho Brahe. All these sun obsessed and superstitious minds did was create models that bore very little to no relationship to reality. Even Tycho Brahe's sun obsessed geocentric model is imaginative nonsense that takes us away from the real world we actually experience. More about all of this to come. Suffice it to say that the basic model of Ptolemy works just fine. There is no logical reason to suppose the lights in sky that rise and set are anything but the primary and Natural light based phenomena they seem to be. Modern science sells the idea that everything is all figured out, when the fact is, the Moon and the lights in the sky are still very much a mystery that might be best described in what we would call electrochemical terms. In other words, a geocentric based electrical model of the Universe, with the Earth surrounded by electrically active plasma, might best describe the world we actually experience and witness.


FIN