Scientism Exposed, in 1915..!?? "50 Reasons: Copernicus or the Bible"

Scientism Exposed, in 1915..!?? "50 Reasons: Copernicus or the Bible"

The mainstream heliocentric model is demonstrably wrong. The modern patchwork contradictory cosmology is as fantastic as the creation story of the Bible; in fact the current mythology most take to be scientific fact is more fantastic and less logical than the creation story to be found in the Bible, which reads like wonderful artistic allegory to me. The fact that no experiment can ever show the Earth orbits or rotates does not mean the Earth is flat or anything like that. It does not mean the Bible is literal history anymore than it means fairies are real. Check the article index or the rest of the website for more; the fact is that there are many obvious contradictory discrepancies to be found in the historical record that clearly show that theories like the legendary so-called "speed of light" are nothing more than completely concocted ad hoc style fantasies. As it "turns" out there is no real reason to believe the world orbits or turns at all. Ideas like "light speed" originate as illogical, ad hoc patchwork explanation.

The evidence kept showing Copernicus, Kepler and Newton wrong and the illogical response was to resort to even more convoluted and complicated models that would go from the basic heliocentric or sun centered Universe of Fixed Stars, through the reality warping ideas of people like Einstein; to the illogical Big Bang Black Holy Balloon expansion into a multiverse of nonsensical non existence, backed with absurdly premised mathematical equation.

A Quote from the book:

"Copernicans say that the moon moves slower when nearer to the sun, because then it is more attracted by the sun. But of the earth they say that it moves faster when nearer to the sun, because then it is more attracted by the sun. Thus the stronger attraction retards the motion of the moon, but accelerates that of the earth. And to reverse, when the sun is more distant and his attraction less, does the moon move faster, but the earth more slowly. Do you understand it? But Laplace informs us: “Though the results seem to contradict each other, yet they suffice to show that the sun's attraction of earth and moon is the only true cause of these irregularities.” That certainly means ‘bringing into captivity' our reason. Yet, that sacrifice must be brought, because the theory of Newton must be defended under all circumstances."

Scientism Exposed, in 1915..!?? "50 Reasons: Copernicus or the Bible"  source: the Truth is stranger than fiction...

This book, "Fifty Reasons, Copernicus Or the Bible: Philosophy and Vain Deceit Or True Science? Which is Right? : the Bible and Practical Astronomy, Or the Babel of Theoretical, Poetical Newtonian Fiction : Here are Fifty Reasons for Believing the Bible", is worth "checking out".

Link to the book:

https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=cmUqz_wbNAEC&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA30